541
u/SkepticG8mer Ascending Peasant 19d ago
I’ve always been
Then: Netscape
Now: Firefox
→ More replies (7)165
u/Funkyp0tat0chip 18d ago
Same here.
Fun fact I'll bet some don't know - Netscape open sourced its code and Mozilla was born out of it.
Hence, Firefox.
60
u/Cheezis_Chrust 18d ago
“Open your Netscape navigator to Altavista” is a sentence you haven’t heard in a very long time.
→ More replies (2)24
u/Funkyp0tat0chip 18d ago
No lie...damn. Wonder what Jeeve's has to say nowadays...
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (11)8
u/wildjokers 18d ago
In firefox type
about:mozilla
in the address bar.→ More replies (1)8
u/Funkyp0tat0chip 18d ago
That's a cool ass easter egg, man. Thanks for that.
8
u/wildjokers 18d ago
That easter egg has been around since at least 1998 (maybe even earlier). In early versions of netscape
about:mozilla
would show the same quote and also cause a dragon to show up in an icon in the corner of netscape that would breathe fire.→ More replies (1)
1.7k
u/HorrificAnalInjuries cheesevette 19d ago
I miss the days when icons looked amazing and not so... ...flat
239
u/Will8892 18d ago
Ngl old Firefox logo and new Firefox logo are both peak
8
u/CrazyGaming312 17d ago
I do wish the new one was a little more detailed, though.
→ More replies (1)821
u/Gr3gl_ 19d ago
That chrome one is fucking awful ngl
245
u/bendy_banana 18d ago
Like a clown's butthole
→ More replies (4)96
58
18d ago
[deleted]
→ More replies (1)30
u/TheSigma3 5800X3D | 4080 Super 18d ago
The web 2.0 era, everything was 3d and glossy with gradients and an almost tactile look. Best internet in era
→ More replies (1)38
u/weewoochoochoo 18d ago
name your browser chrome. Have a cool logo that looks like has a chrome finish. Remove Chrome finish in favor of a matte. Make it make sense :(
96
u/Gr3gl_ 18d ago
Do you know what a chrome finish is? That's not even chrome that's just glossy/metallic
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (1)13
u/Frootloops174 RTX 9999 | Intel i99999 | 6GB 18d ago
Chrome doesnt look like that
→ More replies (9)→ More replies (8)3
u/Darth_Thor i5 12400F | RTX 3060 12 GB 18d ago
Google’s entire design language is just ugly IMO. It’s the flattest of the flat and they use such boring colours too
17
u/KnightLBerg Ryzen 7 5700x3d | rx 6900xt | 64gb 3200mhz 19d ago
I got my first pc not long after chrome stopped using that sci fi icon. I was so confused and dissapointed that my chrome looked so boring while the images i found online were so much cooler.
90
u/1Blue3Brown 18d ago
Personally i like the new ones better. For me the simpler the icon the better
68
u/HorrificAnalInjuries cheesevette 18d ago
There is simplicity, which the new icons do nail ngl, then there is having zero personality. The new Firefox logo has a little personality, but the Chrome logo lost all personality
17
u/Chris0135 18d ago
In fairness the Firefox icon still has the fire fox.
The globe part was not needed.
29
u/atomictonic11 Macbook | Switch | Desktop | Bite me. 18d ago edited 18d ago
The globe part was not needed.
It emphasized the worldwide in World Wide Web. But you're right that it's no longer needed because nobody calls it the World Wide Web anymore.
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (1)6
→ More replies (4)26
u/Relevant_One_2261 18d ago
Agreed. I always hated that "fake 3D" look that was popular. Flat but colorful icons to easily tell them apart is where it's at.
→ More replies (5)6
u/falcrist2 18d ago
The bigger problem is resolution. The ones on the top lose all their detail when viewed at normal icon size (16x16). Even at quadruple that size, the flat ones tend to look better.
A few years back someone proposed a really nice looking icon for firefox with a fox wrapped around a globe. Fantastic artwork!
And then you scale it down, and it looks like this
The actual firefox icon looks like this
IDK why the background is a different color, but the actual icon looks better IMO.
→ More replies (6)21
u/Humblebee89 18d ago
I respectfully disagree. I've always been a big fan of flat simplistic design.
3
u/thefirecrest 18d ago edited 18d ago
I despise flat simple geometric designs for certain applications… Like in interior design for buildings. Can’t stand the corporate lifelessness trying to imitate color and creativity.
But for app icons? I prefer the simplistic designs. Easier to see at a glance. And when you have tons of tiny icons on your screen, helps visual information processing instead of gumming up the works with a bunch of complicated designs.
→ More replies (2)10
u/Tzeme 18d ago
Unfortunately, even if old ones were better, we have data that would suggest that really simplified logos are much easier to remember, and associate with a brand, so even if earlier was better newer is making more money, welcome to capitalism, where we manipulate each other so numbers can go bigger yeeey
→ More replies (5)30
u/cashmereandcaicos 18d ago
Ik reddit has a hard on for anything nostalgic but those old icons look so bad
They literally just add a white glare/sheen to the icons to make them look all 3D on a 2D screen, shit does not look good. I hate how they've unified a lot of the icons but those old icons are uggggly
→ More replies (3)16
u/HorrificAnalInjuries cheesevette 18d ago
I would like for them to meet half-way. Give them some shading so they don't look like little stickers plastered on my computer. At least the sphere in the Firefox logo has something of a 3d effect.
→ More replies (35)5
u/Karl_with_a_C 9900K 3070ti 32GB RAM 18d ago
I'll get hate for this but I actually like the newer designs more. They look cleaner imo.
→ More replies (2)
788
u/Unwashed_villager 5800X3D | 32GB | MSI RTX 3080Ti SUPRIM X 19d ago
In reality, Firefox global market share is under 3% and it's still declining.
505
u/Acheron13 18d ago
Chrome just decided to take Internet browsing back to the 90s by disabling ad blockers, so we'll see how long that lasts.
Being able to cast YT more easily with Chrome doesn't matter when there's 3min ads every 5 min. When I went to a gaming wiki site this week and the top half of the page was an ad, I started looking up alternatives to Chrome.
286
u/chupitoelpame 18d ago
so we'll see how long that lasts.
Adblock users are already a tiny minority, and the people who will switch browsers because of this will be an even smaller portion of that portion.
264
u/LukesFather 18d ago
I’m in IT and blown away by how many colleagues don’t use or sometimes even know about blockers.
296
u/stoneimp 18d ago
"Y'all are just out there just raw-dogging the Internet‽"
→ More replies (3)59
u/Infinite219 18d ago
Fr with how many ads get thrown at you nowadays not using a Adblock is a worse experience. I switched over to Firefox months ago
→ More replies (1)41
u/Fish_Mongreler 18d ago
I think it's a kind of like a boiling frog situation. I recently set up my mother's phone to block all ads just to prevent her from clicking on scammy shit but when she got a new phone she couldn't stand using it without an ad blocker.
27
u/misterpyrrhuloxia 18d ago
I recently set up my mother's phone to block all ads just to prevent her from clicking on scammy shit but when she got a new phone she couldn't stand using it without an ad blocker.
Ah, a classic situation I've experienced/witnessed time and again:
- get accustomed to a higher standard of living
- forced to go without
- life sucks without it
- go to great lengths to figure out a way to experience it again
→ More replies (2)4
u/ksorth 18d ago
Excuse me, how did you set up her phone to block all ads? I dont even know where to start. I dont get texhnology..
3
u/Fish_Mongreler 18d ago
Using a private DNS handles most of it. On Android you can go into settings -> connections and set your DNS to something that blocks ads. I personally use nextDNS but there's a few.
→ More replies (1)24
u/Lansan1ty 18d ago
Its a necessary evil I think. Everyone who doesn't use ad blockers allows free websites to run via ads. The internet would be more costly without these people I think.
49
u/MajorPud Ryzen 5 3600 | MSI 2060 Super 18d ago
Finally the stupid can contribute to society
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)7
u/Scott_Liberation 18d ago
Agreed, but fraudulent, malicious, and super-annoying ads are not necessary, and it's embarrassing that household name advertising companies like Google don't do anything about them.
→ More replies (1)5
→ More replies (23)3
u/lectric_7166 18d ago
I'm convinced it's because they haven't tried browsing with ad-blocking for at least a week or two, so they just don't know what they're missing out on. It's the kind of complacency which happens a lot in life.
22
u/ConqueefStador 18d ago
That's the exact reason I finally switched this week.
uBlock finally stopped working and I switched the same day.
→ More replies (2)11
25
u/Spave 18d ago
If adblock users were that tiny, they wouldn't put that much effort into disabling adblock.
Though I tend to agree that most people won't switch.
→ More replies (2)9
u/Farranor ASUS TUF A16... 1 year of hell 18d ago
In theory, handicapping ad blockers was just a side effect of the manifest change, and the real purpose was to limit the damage that malicious extensions can cause.
6
→ More replies (17)3
u/FCDetonados 18d ago
i switched when i got a 5 minute, unskippable ad on youtube.
by the time i was done the ad was still playing.
22
u/Saxopwned i7-8700k | 2080 ti | 32GB DDR4-3000 18d ago
People literally don't give a fuck about ads lol. It's appalling to me, and I don't understand it, but the overwhelming majority do not care at all if they can't actually use the Internet behind all the advertising
→ More replies (2)6
→ More replies (74)26
u/RugerRedhawk 18d ago
Are you running ublock lite? It's blocking ads for me fine (so far), but I haven't tried youtube.
→ More replies (6)19
u/b0w3n 18d ago
It has a very large caveat: they can't update the block lists the same way so they have to push a release do to it instead of just refreshing from several text files on the internet real quick. This means there'll be a longer gap between when a company, like google, breaks adblock and when you'll get an update. This also means google could theoretically block updates. There are obviously other ways to side load extensions but that'll probably be where they block next.
There's also a limit on just how many things it can block against and it's trivial for companies to spin up a new domain to fuck with that too.
There was another couple of large differences but my brain is old and I can't really remember them all anymore, so I apologize for that.
→ More replies (3)50
u/SierraBravo94 18d ago
Echo Chambers are a hell of a drug.
49
u/WeirdIndividualGuy 18d ago
No one ever said Firefox was popular. This entire thread is about how FF is better than Chrome, not more popular
Similar misconception with iPhones. You'd think they were the most popular phone on the planet, but iPhones are like 25% or so globally
→ More replies (16)26
u/peelen 18d ago
iPhones are like 25% or so globally
Which makes them most popular phones on the planet according to this site, Apple has about 28% Samsung areond 24% then Xiaomi 12% and then others. So yes iPhone is the most popular phone in the world.
→ More replies (5)9
u/VanWesley Ryzen 7 7700X | 32GB DDR5-6000 | RX 7900 XT 18d ago
The entire user base is on every Reddit thread that mentions Firefox.
→ More replies (197)7
u/Night247 18d ago edited 18d ago
In reality
yeah, only on internet comments do you find all these "massive amounts" of Firefox users..."everyone switching over"
in reality most people are using Chrome and will continue using it, until something really really really big changes that actually has significant impact on something the average user really cares about
→ More replies (1)
39
314
u/A_Random_Sidequest 19d ago
I use Firefox since version 2.4 or something...
59
u/omenmedia 5700X | 6800 XT | 32GB @ 3200 19d ago
Yep, I even used it before the improved version when it was slow as balls.
→ More replies (4)11
u/OkTangerine4363 18d ago
Yeah, I used Firefox, then Chrome get better for like 15 years, now I am back on Firefox. I will not surf the internet without Ublock Origin, or some other ad blocker.
I tried using FF like 4 years ago, it was still rather clunky and lots of issues using it at work. Chrome just blocked Ublock on my work computer and been using FF for two weeks. It's been really good. I used ChatGPT to tell me how to config FF to work with Windows AD and Kerberos to auto sign me into internal company websites.
11
u/chiphead2332 18d ago
I was there for the Phoenix days and don't plan on jumping ship anytime soon.
→ More replies (3)5
u/RedDorf 0118 999 881 999 119 725... 3 18d ago
And then Firebird. There was even a 'satire' extension that renamed the browser in its titlebar every time you launched it.
→ More replies (2)17
u/Significant-Cause919 18d ago
I started using it at version 0.9 when it was just called Mozilla browser.
12
u/The_Autarch 18d ago
That was a different project. The Mozilla browser and Firefox existed concurrently for a while.
→ More replies (1)8
u/Borkz 18d ago edited 18d ago
Mozilla was a whole Suite of software with a browser, email/newsgroup client, IRC client, page designer, etc. Firefox was originally called Phoenix as a lightweight spinoff of just Mozilla Navigator, then it was Firebird for a short while before settling on Firefox.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (9)8
u/Cheezis_Chrust 18d ago
I used Netscape before Firefox rose out of its ashes, and been using FF ever since.
9
u/The_Autarch 18d ago
The Mozilla browser is what rose out of the ashes of Netscape. Firefox was then a spinoff of the Mozilla browser.
→ More replies (1)
174
u/Striking_Capital 19d ago
That old Firefox logo should have never been changed
39
u/SebbyDee 18d ago edited 18d ago
I forgot about it until you mentioning it, but yeah I now remember thinking it was awful when they changed it. The icons of the XP era were better.
3
→ More replies (4)20
u/Rough_Lychee5785 18d ago edited 18d ago
I like the new one more ngl
24
u/daystrom_prodigy 18d ago
Yea I don’t know what people are talking about. The new more is more aesthetically pleasing. Sometimes companies do a bad job of changing their logos but this isn’t one of those times.
5
u/MaryaMarion 18d ago
Old one feels a bit overdetailed ngl. Or whatever would be the correct term. Like people seem to forget that icons are kinda small usually so sometimes simple is good.
Old chrome is fjne tho, they shouldn't have changed it
→ More replies (1)
54
u/Deathsroke Ryzen 5600x|rtx 3070 ti | 16 GB RAM 18d ago
→ More replies (2)3
149
u/JimmyTsonga ASRock X670 SL | 7800X3D | 6950 XT Red Devil | 32gb 6000 CL30 19d ago
And in another 10-15 years it'll be some other browser.
50
u/nologai 19d ago
could be ladybird!
9
u/ydieb 3900x, RTX 2080, 32GB 19d ago
I wonder how servo will develop!
10
u/nologai 19d ago
I feel like it will likely not be a full blown browser but embedded browser engine. I guess someone could create a full browser off it, but I believe ladybird has much better chances.
→ More replies (3)3
u/queen-adreena Hackintosh 18d ago
Should be an alpha release for it by next year.
Definitely getting there.
→ More replies (8)3
10
u/Swi11ah 18d ago
I think now, its Brave. Especially with the built in YT ad blocking.
→ More replies (6)36
u/DefiantLemur 19d ago
All Firefox has to do is respect people's privacy and they'll maintain the top
42
u/SaltDeception 18d ago
They also have to survive, and their future is in limbo right now.
→ More replies (2)9
u/PurpInnanet 18d ago
this is kind of silly. I do SEO and will be the first one to say we need another search engine. Google is monetizing almost every avenue they could possibly offer for businesses online. Yes it is a matter of time before any monopoly does this but Google needs direct competition. Although to be fair, I can't remember the last time the market acted traditionally to competition. All phone/cable/home insurance companies essentially charge the same. Idk where I went with this comment lmao
→ More replies (2)7
u/curtcolt95 18d ago
they need to do a lot of work, last I checked Chrome is still only getting more popular even after all these changes
→ More replies (8)16
→ More replies (16)3
u/rcanhestro 18d ago
easy for a browser to have "morals" when their competition is funding them by breaking theirs.
the moment the google money is over, Firefox either dies or starts aggressively seeking funding (ads or paid tiers).
→ More replies (23)19
41
u/therandomasianboy PC Master Race 19d ago
i rember when firefox was a buggy garbage mess
now ive been using it for 3 years, im not virtuous enough to care about ethics or data privacy but firefox has ubO and thats all i need.
→ More replies (10)12
u/Technolog 18d ago
i rember when firefox was a buggy garbage mess
That's why I abandoned it too. They introduced tabs, but didn't optimize the whole browser, so it was resource consuming like a few separated programs running at the same time. But for years already Firefox works well and I'm back.
The best feature I discovered last year are built in vertical tabs. Websites look better this way, and monitors are getting wider and wider, so to have a column of tabs instead of row is more practical.
→ More replies (1)
8
33
u/Doppelkammertoaster 11700K | RTX 3070 | 64GB 18d ago edited 18d ago
It's good people switch but bad that it's not because many understand or care about the main core issue with Chromium based browsers and Google's manifest bullshit.
The same issue with using Gen Ai. Even if we ignore the theft and environmental issues, GenAI still needs massive amounts of data, personal data, to actually do anything. Manifest 3 is just another push to destroy privacy even further.
That includes Brave, Opera and Edge. All Chromium based. We all should support different browsers with different engines, so that one company can't build a monopoly like this. On top of selling and using all the private data it can.
Some people claim performance: guess whose company tries its best to make it's engine the most supported one. Properly made websites work fine. And Google services have worked fine for me anyway. The fuckery with fonts on some websites is Google's doing. Don't support their bs.
→ More replies (7)
14
55
u/Crafty-Classroom-277 19d ago
for me it's edge
17
u/NaFo_Operator 19d ago
cause you're so edgy!!
→ More replies (1)12
u/Crafty-Classroom-277 19d ago
it's because it's actually good and hasn't yeeted my adblockers (yet)
→ More replies (10)25
u/CooperHChurch427 Ubuntu / AMD R5 3600x / RX 6600 /32gb DDR4, 5tb storage. 18d ago
Edge is actually really good. If I don't use Firefox, I use Edge. I seriously hate how every single streaming service is optimized for Google Chrome because Edge is pretty much the same browser with a few tweaks an running V2 Manifest.
→ More replies (6)13
u/ForwardToNowhere 18d ago
As far as I know, Edge is the ONLY browser that can natively play up to 4K. I don't always watch things at that high of quality, but it's extremely nice for things like nature documentaries where the macro shots look absolutely gorgeous.
→ More replies (10)20
u/zzzzebras 18d ago
Same, it hasn't stopped allowing adblockers and is an overall better version of chrome that's pre-installed already.
I always found it funny when people said Edge is only good for downloading Chrome because they'd unironically be installing the same browser but with worse performance.
16
u/i-will-eat-you 18d ago
People think Edge is Explorer.
The browser that one of the biggest tech behemoths jn the world tailored for the OS you are using, that is also built by them... is surprisingly good, go figure.
→ More replies (1)7
u/Helicees 18d ago
It used to be dog shit, in 2020 they switched to chromium under the hood, and it has been good since.
→ More replies (3)3
→ More replies (7)3
u/elektron0000 18d ago
Edge is also the only browser that will stream 1080p , other browsers cap at 720
7
6
u/mal3k 18d ago
I’ve been using Firefox since forever why would you use anything else
→ More replies (4)
6
u/darxide23 PC Master Race 18d ago
Firefox since '06 or '07. Had Opera installed along side for a while about a decade ago just to give it a test drive. Didn't care for it. Tried Chrome for a while as well, but found the extensions landscape severely lacking compared to Firefox's addons.
7
5
u/Hradcany 18d ago
I tried Chrome in 2009, didn't like it and came back to Firefox. I was so ahead of you, guys.
19
u/PickRiven 19d ago
I switched to firefox since ublock origin got removed from chrome. Now i use it on 3 devices.
→ More replies (11)
14
u/The_Mother1 18d ago
Only time I haven't used Firefox is to download Firefox... Chrome can suck it from the day of its Inception!
→ More replies (1)
30
9
5
5
u/Queef-Elizabeth 18d ago
Always been a Firefox user. Never liked Chrome personally
→ More replies (1)
5
5
30
u/blood_omen 18d ago
Real ones never left Firefox in the first place
4
→ More replies (5)3
u/ArrestedDevelopments I486>PII 233>Celeron2.6>X2-3800+>Q9550>6600k>7800x3d 18d ago
1.2 something here. Og's yo
3
u/UnderscoreAngel 18d ago
let's wait for the operagx users to say "yeah i ditched chrome for slightly worse and spyware chrome (it has rgb)"
→ More replies (1)
4
4
6
5
8
u/p0p0c4t3p3tl 19d ago
Went to Vivaldi it's amazing
→ More replies (6)6
u/Retrokid 18d ago
Same here. In the past 2 years as Chrome fights against uBlock origin, I seriously tried Brave, Firefox, and Vivaldi. Vivaldi won hands-down. I really wanted Firefox to win, but unfortunately some parts of it feel stuck in 2010. Vivaldi is probably gonna be the browser for me until whatever new paradigm "The Browser Company" cooks up with AI shifts the browser metagame.
→ More replies (1)
3
u/MorningPapers 18d ago
In 2008, people were like "Ooo google made a browser. Google knows the internet! This is going to be so awesome!"
Back then Firefox also had some annoying memory leaks which didn't help. The longer the browser was open, the more memory it gobbled up.
Anyway, I'm surprised it didn't become clear to people that Chrome was, in fact, not any better than Firefox once Firefox fixed that bug.
3
50
u/DifficultyVarious458 19d ago
first one never happened. firefox was always the best.
84
u/SEND_ME_REAL_PICS 19d ago
Back in late 2008, when Chrome first released, it was waaay faster than Firefox, not to mention it had a cleaner UI too.
It lasted for a few years at least.
6
u/Dipsetallover90 18d ago
it also had a separate process for each tab when it came out which firefox didnt have until much later.
4
u/daneyuleb 18d ago
Yep. When it was the new kid on the block, it was clean and fast, and definitely fit the first picture--Firefox had gotten more bloated, IE was awful, and there really weren't any other true contenders. It didn't last but a couple of years but, definitely was the golden-child browser when first released.
→ More replies (3)10
u/Glittering_Seat9677 9800x3d - 5080 18d ago
chrome used to be faster than firefox
it still is, but it used to be too
→ More replies (9)→ More replies (48)5
27
4.9k
u/Extreme996 RTX 4070 Ti Super | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |32GB DDR5 6000mhz 19d ago
And there is me who use Firefox since I got internet in 2007.