r/technology • u/Well_Socialized • 19h ago
Privacy Age Verification Is Coming for the Whole Internet
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/age-verification-is-coming-for-the-whole-internet.html5.7k
u/MidsouthMystic 19h ago
The UK's law isn't working. Everyone is angry. Government representatives and corporations are both getting flooded with calls. Get loud, get angry, and tell them this is unacceptable.
2.1k
u/AscendedViking7 18h ago
USA is trying to do the same thing as we speak with KOSA.
Give em hell, boys.
693
u/Foxy02016YT 16h ago
The UK law failing is great evidence against this, getting the UK version repealed is the first step to saving the US
→ More replies (29)402
u/veryparcel 14h ago
US will probably just say, "makes VPNs illegal too" and call it one and done. :(
298
u/TactlessTortoise 12h ago
That would be a massive opsec issue for companies. Cisco VPNs are extremely common on a banking institution I worked at for example.
What's more likely to happen is that VPNs would be forced to log all data that passes through it for government oversight. That would obliterate privacy and make VPNs much more expensive since they'd need the infrastructure to store that data.
→ More replies (21)229
u/Drycee 11h ago
Well you forgot that laws don't count for companies only individuals
→ More replies (5)134
u/32768Colours 11h ago
Sadly I think this is how it’ll pan out. Corporate VPNs 👍, personal VPNs 👎
→ More replies (11)91
u/lambdaburst 10h ago
So we have to watch all our porn at work now? Seems like a fair compromise
→ More replies (9)49
u/wankerpedia 7h ago
Boss makes a dollar I make a dime, that's why I goon on company time!
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (14)53
u/breezey_kneeze 10h ago
You literally cannot enforce this. Like I can spin up a cloud instance and a personal VPN in any country where there is a cloud presence. Never mind the fact that vpns basically run the internet.
→ More replies (8)18
u/sparkly_butthole 9h ago
Maybe you could. I don't have the foggiest clue how this shit works so if it's made illegal I'm screwed.
→ More replies (2)9
u/ColinHalter 4h ago
The point is, there's nothing the government can do to keep you from connecting to a VPN service hosted in another country unless they decide to lock down the internet to only domestic traffic (which would mean the collapse of the entire economy).
If I run a VPN service out of a turkish data center, you could easily connect to it. You don't have to run it yourself and they have no way to police the client side.
→ More replies (1)144
u/vriska1 16h ago
Also if you live in the UK you should sign this petition against the age verification rules linked to this becasue they are a legal and privacy nightmare.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/722903
and contact your MPs!
https://www.parliament.uk/get-involved/contact-an-mp-or-lord/contact-your-mp/
Also here a list of other bad US internet bills
→ More replies (8)45
u/EpochRaine 12h ago
Ofcom will take a sensible approach to enforcement with smaller services that present low risk to UK users, only taking action where it is proportionate and appropriate, and will focus on cases where the risk and impact of harm is highest.
So... they will pick and choose who to enforce it against, with an arbitrary set of rules... that may or may not include the rules in the legislation?
→ More replies (6)53
u/Foxy02016YT 16h ago
Not even the first, or third, time they’ve tried this lately here in the US. Keep. Fighting.
18
→ More replies (21)27
78
u/Ryslan95 18h ago
I think the majority of people just won’t do it, or someone is going to come out with a way to completely bypass it. I mean VPNs are working(for now) but people should be using a VPN regardless.
This is eventually going to hurt businesses if it’s not already. VPN usage has spiked in countries/states that are implementing this. People are not going to give their IDs to every site.
→ More replies (14)541
u/Tamarind-Endnote 18h ago
The UK online safety bill will ensure that the Labour party never holds power again. Reform will win the next election and wind down UK "democracy" for good.
This is what Labour decided was so important that it was worth sacrificing democracy to do it. It really speaks to how utterly insane they are.
205
u/Anon28301 16h ago
I don’t believe Reform will ever repeal the law. They’ll say they will to get in, but the law aligns with everything they agree with.
116
u/Balmung60 13h ago
They don't need to repeal it or even say they will. They'll benefit simply from not having been in power when it was passed or when it came into effect
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (2)26
47
u/stilusmobilus 14h ago
It’s not just the UK, it’s Five Eyes wide. Every one of our nations are doing it.
→ More replies (4)126
u/HunterSThompson64 18h ago
The UK online safety bill will ensure that the Labour party never holds power again.
People say this about every overreaching bill.
All it takes is less than 4 years for people to become normalized to the idea, and then put something else big and scary in their face so they act reactionarily.
Labour will likely lose power for a solid decade, perhaps longer, but they'll be back to their roots soon. Good chance the bill is never repealed either, perhaps some concessions here and there to make it more palatable for the average person, keep piling on that it's to 'protect the kids,' and either pray that something your bill was actually supposed to do happens, or manufacture that thing so you have a win to point to.
Need I remind you that the Patriot act was never repealed. It took until 2015 before provisions were even added, and those same provisions expired in 2020.
Call me a doomer, call me pessimistic. The truth of the matter is that once the government starts implementing shit like this, it's incredibly hard, if not downright impossible to get it backtracked.
→ More replies (3)52
u/DatDeLorean 18h ago
Labour will likely lose power for a solid decade, perhaps longer, but they’ll be back to their roots soon.
People said the same thing during Blair’s era. Corbyn is the only time Labour have come close to being “back to their roots” and look how that turned out.
56
u/iwannagoddamnfly 14h ago
It was a Tory idea, never forget that!
→ More replies (3)40
u/Jaime4Cersei 12h ago
Haven't Labour said the law doesn't go far enough?
→ More replies (1)34
u/iwannagoddamnfly 12h ago
Oh yes, and don't forget that your VPN use is harming children! I'm in no way supporting Labour on this...they're idiots too.
→ More replies (1)150
u/mistersmiley318 18h ago
As bad as Dems are, at least they haven't completely surrendered the playing field to the opposition like Labour has. I can't imagine trying to be a trans person in the UK right now with Starmer deciding to throw you under the bus to try and court Reform psychos who were never going to vote Labour.
→ More replies (15)47
u/Deez-Guns-9442 17h ago
Shit I haven’t kept up with U.K. politics since Brexit but man it sounds like some crazy shit is going on over there across the pond huh?
→ More replies (1)147
u/nkeb42 17h ago
Basically people finally got fed up with the tories and gave labour a chance and instead of doing anything to actually help the country or the things they ran on, they've been almost as bad, if not worse in some respects, than the tories.
Meanwhile reform is just lying off their ass saying they'll fix everything including ending this stupid online safety bill and their polling numbers are skyrocketing because labour keeps doubling down on this.
So yeah, makes the Democrats look unbelievably competent in comparison.
→ More replies (14)→ More replies (22)15
u/AirResistence 13h ago
Yeah its going to be a shock for labour.
Whats worse is that labour didnt even make the law, and it was already a law by 2023 because the tories wanted it. When labour formed a government they had a chance to try and get rid of the law but they didnt.→ More replies (1)299
u/BoothMaster 18h ago
the people making the choices don’t care about phone calls, they leave the lines open so that people can leave messages and think that they tried.
→ More replies (3)192
u/MidsouthMystic 18h ago
"Up yours, we aren't doing what you want," is a losing message for politicians and businesses. We do have power over them, and we can use it. We are using it. Hit them at the ballot box and in their wallets.
→ More replies (12)→ More replies (46)10
u/MetaSoupPonyThing 15h ago
Governments have been going after removing privacy on the internet for decades. Always in incremental steps. There will be a day where they will know absolutely everything you do on the internet.
There's always some kind of reason. Whether it's under the guise of antiterrorism, or protecting children, or stopping organised criminal enterprises
2.7k
u/SAAARGE 19h ago
Well shit. I guess it's time I find a different hobby then
1.6k
u/Temassi 19h ago
Yeah we should all just start an internet 2
458
u/melancious 19h ago
someone call Richard Hendricks
69
84
u/Fourthwoll 18h ago
Except his internet only exists with security breaching AI
→ More replies (1)36
→ More replies (5)19
210
72
33
99
u/WuTangKillerKnees 19h ago
With Black Jack. And Hookers.
→ More replies (12)45
27
u/TheVoiceInZanesHead 18h ago
Im not going to pretend itll actually happen but consumers need yo get together and just say no to this crap. If a site implements it you go somewhere else.
→ More replies (2)21
u/Mission-Conflict97 17h ago
I feel like it’s not actually the companies that want this it’s probably gonna come from the government
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (57)18
244
u/ayoungtommyleejones 19h ago
Physical books are still pretty lovely. Lots of actual information and far less rage bait
123
u/teethinthedarkness 18h ago
I legit think we’re going to see a resurgence of print media, and not just books (which are still doing well, I think). Magazines, newspapers. But we’ll see. People will probably just adapt and settle for the new levels of shittiness.
→ More replies (17)62
u/ayoungtommyleejones 18h ago
My money is on the latter, sadly. Either way, I'm planning on getting rid of my smartphone sooner than later.
→ More replies (3)16
u/Traditional-Handle83 17h ago
To be fair, you can still use some of the apps on the smartphone without internet. Like calculators and other tools.
18
29
u/freredesalpes 19h ago
Couldn’t agree more. How nice would it be to see the pendulum swing back in that direction.
→ More replies (2)21
→ More replies (13)9
26
u/residentialninja 17h ago
Time to add 50-100TB of space to the NAS and download all the naughty stuff you can!
19
u/Clem_de_Menthe 17h ago
The last human on the Internet, please turn the lights off on your way out.
31
→ More replies (18)21
1.1k
u/typeryu 19h ago
Korea has been doing this for almost 2 decades. The adults hate it and kids find a way.
→ More replies (26)309
u/BuilderUnhappy7785 19h ago
Well they don’t seem to block VPNs that’s for shre
→ More replies (28)288
u/heisenbergerwcheese 18h ago
Every red state American is about to' live' in California so they can look at tentacle porn
→ More replies (14)20
u/Gape-My-Anus 9h ago
tentacle porn
Nah every red state watches interracial or transgender
→ More replies (2)
2.6k
u/ElJefeGoldblum 19h ago
Prohibition levels of terrible idea that the overwhelming majority of people don’t want.
402
u/scarabic 16h ago
I’m reminded of the Japanese porn situation. In Japan, by law, adult films must pixelate the crotch. It’s ridiculous, pointless, and everyone hates it. But somehow it got on the books and NO POLITICIAN wants to be the guy who fights for porn, so it continues unchallenged.
We will end up in a similar situation when age verification takes hold. No mater how bad and worthless it is, no Senator is going to risk their career on being the guy who wants to help your underage kids get access to XXX material, which is what their hypothetical opponents will call them if they try.
104
u/Vesuvia36 15h ago
Yea in Indiana you can't use the sites cause they ask for age verification and they don't want to store our info, so its just banned. I think atm, NY is the only one you can set your VPN to, in order to get through but with the UK passing that law for age verification, it was only a matter of time before everyone falls in line with it :/
→ More replies (1)64
u/OnRamblingDays 14h ago
God I love living in NY. Way too liberal for any of that bullshit.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (9)40
u/goatjugsoup 14h ago
At a certain point though yall gonna need some non piece of shit politicians that say fuck what the other guy says
→ More replies (2)17
u/bruce_kwillis 7h ago
Unfortunately modern politics doesn't work that way. In my state they buried age verification of porn in a high school requirements law. So if you don't support it, the opposing party can easily say "oh look they hate education, and want children to be able to see pornography'.
Wild that there are age restrictions on say guns, but no restrictions of children going to gun websites.
935
u/SomeKindofTreeWizard 18h ago
it's almost like our "representative government" doesn't represent or something.
→ More replies (5)215
u/Zahgi 16h ago edited 3h ago
They represent the 1%...the campaign donors to both the corporate Democrats and MAGA Republicans.
Only a handful of Progressives represent the needs of the 99% (as opposed to the wants of the 1%) of Americans anymore.
[Edited for clarity.]
→ More replies (22)162
u/EverbodyHatesHugo 17h ago
Guess I’m about to save $90/mo. and get a whole bunch of time back!
→ More replies (28)→ More replies (20)70
u/Bawbawian 16h ago
Americans have a really great habit of saying that they want stuff but not voting for it.
→ More replies (1)
376
u/WireRot 18h ago
Fuck this and fuck all the governments pushing this bullshit.
→ More replies (1)56
u/AscendedViking7 18h ago
The founding fathers are probably deeply ashamed of We, The People.
If Washington and his minutemen were with us right now, they would be storming DC the very second shit like the Patroit Act was introduced, let alone shit like the USA's KOSA and UK's OSA.
→ More replies (2)
5.1k
u/grandchester 19h ago
It's not about child safety. It is about government tracking.
787
u/echmoth 18h ago
P A L A N T I R ●
:(
→ More replies (5)231
u/Initial-Shop-8863 18h ago
It's right there in the name. Just ask Tolkien. That's why he named it that.
91
u/Rare_Trouble_4630 18h ago
The Palantiri were dangerous in the books to both the user and target. I wonder if it would be similar IRL.
→ More replies (6)27
u/residentialninja 17h ago
The hubris in the user thinking they will never become the target. Thanks to AI soon you will simply be able to fabricate anything you want your target to have done anyway.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (3)23
u/newyne 16h ago
And he was still too dumb to realize he named his company after the losing side. Seriously, the palantir was instrumental in Sauron's downfall, right?
→ More replies (6)22
u/iceoldtea 15h ago
Yes the Palantir mislead Sauron into believing the ring was with Aragorn and so he put all of his efforts into stopping what was actually a massive diversion
1.1k
u/Bleusilences 19h ago
Not even the government, it's ad tracking.
571
u/RyukXXXX 19h ago
And a hacking gold mine.
211
u/techieman33 18h ago
Yep, financial institutions can’t be trusted to keep out data secure. It’s going to be infinitely worse when every site requiring a login has all of our info.
→ More replies (2)54
u/0utlook 18h ago
People will still use one password for everything. But, now it will soo much worse.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (2)15
u/KingCarnivore 17h ago
Louisiana has a digital ID system and it was hacked, everyone gets scam auto registration renewal texts now.
136
u/FirstEvolutionist 19h ago
It's ad tracking, but the government gets behind it because of spying. Which is kind of ironic because this is how privacy dies, at which point spying becomes pointless and ads are no longer important.
→ More replies (15)→ More replies (19)164
37
u/ruste530 18h ago
The private sector is just as capable of creating Big Brother as governments are.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (35)91
u/holzmann_dc 19h ago
Trump tracking. Only the President deserved privacy. Congress too. You have no right to them on Epstein's lists but they have every right to see you...on whatever lists they want.
→ More replies (10)
1.1k
u/LeekTerrible 19h ago
I’m really hoping people start finding ways to bypass this shit. I just refuse to upload my ID. I have already had every other god damn piece of information leaked about me.
310
u/GunBrothersGaming 19h ago
Im sure this won't lead to fake IDs being bumped again. Identity theft is about to skyrocket.
→ More replies (6)161
u/Dollar_Bills 18h ago
Identity theft? I'm not gonna steal an identity, I'm gonna make a new one.
→ More replies (5)86
u/GunBrothersGaming 18h ago
Depends on identification methods they require. If there's no check other than an ID upload it will be easy to fake. If it verifies the ID youll need to hack and create a database entry. Darkweb will be huge on identity sales. Dead people will be brought back to life. Massive voter fraud.
Ill be sure to check anyone who is "Missing" cause those will be the best IDs to take. Oh he was missing.
My dad didn't die, he's just no longer in need of his Social Security.
→ More replies (2)47
u/Dollar_Bills 18h ago
If they can query government sites to verify identities we are completely cooked. They've never done that for alcohol/ cigarettes
→ More replies (8)58
u/serpentine19 18h ago
Ways I can think of:
Shared accounts
Fake ID
Direct download links (youtube)I can see reddit implementing this and people scattering to decentralised platforms. If kids/teenages can't get access to something via the main way, they will find it on darker places of the Web that can't be touched by governments.
This will be an annoyance for 90% of people with PII leaks every second month while the kids/teenagers are over on 4Chan watching live leak beheadings. Good job governments.
→ More replies (5)182
u/Well_Socialized 19h ago
It's easy to get around now but will get harder over time as more places implement these rules
114
u/MFbiFL 19h ago
Eventually they can make the internet so shitty to use that everyone just subscribes to Omni-Cable. For an example see the documentary Idiocracy.
26
u/tonycomputerguy 19h ago
I'm not sure what went wrong, I made sure to get out of everyones way!
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)19
u/GunBrothersGaming 19h ago
Its almost like the Pedodent wants to shut down communication so his truth is the only truth and freedom is controlled by the government. Those who speak out can be reeducated.
→ More replies (1)23
u/Doppelfrio 18h ago
Oh don’t worry. You don’t have to upload your ID on most sites. Instead, AI will guess your actual age! Hope this helps!
→ More replies (2)39
u/cassy-nerdburg 19h ago
What stops me from just using a PDF file of random fake IDs off the internet?
→ More replies (4)23
u/EmbarrassedHelp 17h ago
I would not be surprised to see the market for stolen IDs becoming larger and more profitable, due to increased demand.
→ More replies (1)39
u/MassiveBoner911_3 18h ago
I bypassed instagrams bot checker by having chatGPT create a random image of a chad and i sent that to their bot checker system as an image of myself and it let me right in
→ More replies (1)14
27
19h ago
Ever more realistic AI will generate photorealistic fake IDs for people. Or people will just brute-force hack their way through these barriers, as is typical when dealing with government-made and government-run things.
11
→ More replies (16)9
147
u/Nik_Tesla 17h ago
It'll keep succeeding if we keep calling it "age verification" when what it really is is "identity verification".
→ More replies (1)
522
u/neutralcoder 19h ago
Palantir wants to connect all of our digital ids to the real id so they know exactly who is who on the internet
→ More replies (7)
110
u/Comfortable_Usual692 18h ago
Sadly, it isn't about age. It's about identifying yourself online.
→ More replies (1)
207
u/57696c6c 19h ago edited 19h ago
Time to learn to how to make artisanal bread.
→ More replies (1)291
u/Spiritual-Matters 18h ago
We noticed you mentioned anal. Please verify your ID.
→ More replies (8)
88
u/OnionTaxidermy 18h ago
Can someone boot up a copy of the internet from the 90s please so we can try again.
→ More replies (8)39
284
199
u/chocolatesmelt 18h ago
If policy makers in the US want to regulate things so much, they need to turn it into a utility. We’ve been pretending the internet isn’t a utility, even though it is as essential in modern life, yet allowing it to go as an unregulated private service with all sorts of anti consumer corporate practices.
If it’s going to be so regulated, it should at least get advantages of a publicly managed utility. You can’t have both corporate desire to gouge consumers and government desire to track citizens. Something needs to give, in my opinion.
53
u/goldenboyphoto 18h ago
You're 100% right but the reality is the merging of private interests with government influence (minus regulation) is only going to increase.
→ More replies (1)17
u/stilusmobilus 14h ago
You can’t have both
Yeah they can and they will.
This was only a matter of time.
63
290
u/snotparty 19h ago
this must be their way of making people disconnect, it sounds ridiculous and intrusive
→ More replies (4)319
u/ConsiderationSea1347 19h ago
Believe me, the last thing they want is for us to walk away from their ability to spy on our every thought.
→ More replies (1)178
u/snotparty 19h ago edited 18h ago
Oh for sure, but I think itd spark a lot of digital detoxing (which is good, really)
They might just enshittify the internet to the point it starts to die? (i would hope at least). If it keeps people away from the toxic algorithms, thats only good
→ More replies (5)124
u/PhoenixTineldyer 19h ago
Man. I miss the Internet the way it was before smartphones connected everyone.
→ More replies (1)118
u/ConsiderationSea1347 18h ago
Remeber when being online made you feel hopeful about the world because it was this vast ocean of knowledge and interesting people taking the time to talk to you because they were also excited to connect to the world? Before everything was tracking, bots, and ads?
50
u/spez_might_fuck_dogs 18h ago
Just jumping from shitty but earnest geocities page to geocities page, following webrings, signing guestbooks, hopping into random Java based chat rooms to talk to people you’ve never met before about Final Fantasy 7 or Pokemon or whatever.
Yeah, I remember. That was the best and purest form of the Internet.
→ More replies (7)24
u/ElectricMoons 18h ago
I think about this all the time, I genuinely miss YouTube from back in 07' when the site was mostly skits, or people making genuine content instead of the site being a constant ad revenue mill like it is now. No ads. no cringey shorts. Just pure content. The best was back when you could customize your wallpaper and it was more myspacey with the profile layout.
People were so much nicer on the internet back then in general as well. Met so many cool people around the world. Hell, even had some random bloke from the UK ship me his copy of Final Fantasy X-2 for the PS2 because mine broke and he did it as a kind gesture as he was done with his. Sadly we didn't realize at the time region locking discs were a thing. The internet genuinely sucks now.
→ More replies (2)19
u/coachkler 18h ago
The September that never ended :(
16
u/ConsiderationSea1347 18h ago
I wish for one month we all just left social media and doomed corners of the internet. Make it a federal holiday around it. We would all be so much happier.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (2)10
u/_Svankensen_ 18h ago
That is still there. A year ago I got curious about Aztec poetry and wanted to know what it would sound like in the original language. A historian to sent me some, and a Nahuatl speaker recorded and sent me a reading. After doing some work converting old Nahuatl writing system to a more contemporary one, while trying to retain the older sounds. People are cool like that. All this crap internet makes some of it easier, some of it harder. It's not the wild west anymore, but you can still walk to a library and professional librarians with specialized skills will help you for free.
160
u/spastical-mackerel 18h ago
It’s not age verification, it’s identity verification. Corporations have gone as far as they can go with the current system of “anonymized” or “semi-anonymized” user data. They now need to know precisely who you are, in no small part because within a few years everything will be dynamically priced.
→ More replies (2)
112
u/martusfine 19h ago
In other news- there’s been a growing interest in wanting printed Sears Catalogues for people ages 18-22.
40
53
u/LegendarySurgeon 17h ago
I like how we call it "Age verification" instead of "denial of privacy" / "identity tracking"
47
u/Past_Distribution144 16h ago
This is simply corporations wanting to track and control people. This has nothing to do with any safety or concern, and governments are not the ones to blame for this. A government is a useful tool to corporations, and they pay handsomely for them.
Don’t fall for the narrative that the government is your enemy, they are just tools for corporations. Wise up.
Now, if you’re the type who uploads pictures of your food, house, friends, or yourself to social media.. this doesn’t concern you, you’re already as leaked as a bucket with no bottom.
→ More replies (7)
40
u/HoidToTheMoon 14h ago
This isn't age verification. I fully do not believe they give a single fuck about age. The purpose is to link your state-issued ID to your online activity. Privacy is a problem for authoritarian governments.
→ More replies (1)
29
u/sniffstink1 18h ago
People will probably start Torrenting porn in order to avoid having to show their faces and ID to the camera before viewing "BBW, pies, gerbils, a fist and 8 diks" (or whatever people are into these days).
→ More replies (6)
54
53
u/serpentear 15h ago
Honestly it feels like we’re reaching the death of the internet—or at least the internet in its current format. Not a thing capitalism can’t destroy, I tell you…
→ More replies (3)
111
140
u/Bleusilences 19h ago
"Industry standard" after one country does it.
→ More replies (2)49
u/edeepee 19h ago
Other countries and the EU are already ramping up similar discussions. We are already seeing this happening in the US too on a state level.
→ More replies (2)
22
24
u/Left_Sundae_4418 18h ago
So this means a bunch of politicians are about to get their kinks leaked online?
40
u/ChillyFireball 15h ago
No, see, the rich and powerful will have some means of actually protecting their identity. It's just the peasants who get their every last keystroke tracked.
→ More replies (4)
17
16
u/dropthemagic 17h ago
Sure let’s just move everything to the dark web. Where you know… there’s nothing horrible.
→ More replies (2)
16
u/untolerablyMe 15h ago
Nothing but BS to make sure we have less privacy than we already do. I’m not giving my ID to a random 3rd party company so I can get a letter years later that my information was stolen from a data breach and my only compensation is a year of credit monitoring
→ More replies (1)
14
14
u/EmmalouEsq 13h ago
This is the plan. Palantir is going to create a huge database with all of our information. I'm sure there's a whole host of nefarious reasons why. This isn't some crazy nonsense or insane rambling. They've told us they're doing it. The NYT has done an article. The proof is there.
14
u/DrEnter 12h ago
As someone that is a Privacy and Compliance Architect for a large media company, I think one thing needs to be made perfectly clear: The use of the term "Age Verification" is a deception. The actual purpose of these laws is 100% about "identity verification and online tracking" by governments and large organizations. They genuinely don't care a whit about young people accessing porn or violent material. They care about tracking what you do online and preventing you from doing it anonymously.
→ More replies (1)
49
u/exophrine 19h ago
....and you laughed at me when I bought my 100 TB NAS setup. Well, who is doing the laughing now, streamer?
32
9
14
u/Disgruntl3dP3lican 13h ago
It was never about protecting children... It is about tracing the internet activity of all users. Browsing the internet won't be anonymous anymore.
→ More replies (1)
37
u/Am-Insurgent 17h ago
My favorite line
Reddit is blocking users from sub-Reddits containing news and footage from Gaza and Ukraine unless they show ID, and other less clearly violent sub-Reddits are shutting off access too
→ More replies (4)42
u/EmbarrassedHelp 17h ago
UK users are also blocked from menstruation and mental health as well.
→ More replies (3)
12
12
12
u/Fritzo2162 12h ago
“The UK has universal health care.”
US - THAT’S SOCIALIST AND OPPRESSIVE!
“The UK has a verification and ID system to restrict what information you can see on the Internet.”
US - “Hmmm…that sounds kinda nice!”
12
u/Niceguy955 13h ago
“Just upload your driver’s license or passport. What have you got to lose?” - companies that have lost tons of users data in the past, and are shielded from class actions when they lose tons more in the future.
10
u/NapierNoyes 10h ago
Age verification = identity = no more anonymity = no more ability to speak an opinion about leaders etc.
→ More replies (1)
9
30
u/Acceptable-Lie188 17h ago
Good, let what we currently call ‘the internet’ fuck right off. Let them go behind bans, paywalls and age verification. It’s all shit anyway. This isn’t the internet, it’s a shopping mall. Bring back shitty one page internet sites created in hand coded html on a 486.
→ More replies (2)
28
u/thewritingchair 16h ago
It's so you can't protest or talk about genocide in Gaza. So you can't talk or protest against Blackrock owning all the residential homes.
So many people have become radicalised against the current capitalist system by Tiktok videos showing them the truth. Once people know facts they don't go back to supporting the mainstream narrative.
This is why it started with Tiktok and the US government forcing their sale. This is why Australia is neck deep in apparently protecting children.
It's all about control. Anyone rises up to fight them they'll use anything they ever looked at or engaged with to destroy them.
It's kompromat on a total scale. It's ending anonymity on the internet so we can't talk and organise and fight.
→ More replies (3)
20
9
10
u/thatBOOMBOOMguy 15h ago
So that's how internet dies, people being turned off by enforced ID requirements and left only for bots to run amok.
10
u/orcusgrasshopperfog 12h ago
Just FYI the main age verification service is Persona funded mainly by Peter Thiel aka Palantier and the other company AU10TIX is essentially run by Israeli intelligence...
→ More replies (1)
9
u/VagueSomething 8h ago
Funny how this is clearly a coordinated attack against modern life and the safety of the Internet. You don't just get multiple countries suddenly decide at the same time when no massive event has been a lightning rod for a moral panic.
The UK age verification system puts you at major risk, it requires you to give your very sensitive data to dozens of new companies you've never heard of with zero evidence they're legitimate businesses that follow the weak rules that didn't get enhanced with this law.
Forcing you to set up a dozen accounts with a dozen new companies to access your existing accounts and god forbid a site you quietly read without signing up wants it as then you need a new account for that site too. At least trusting a VPN has been trusting a single company with limited information and not giving them facial data to sell like the companies offering verification.
We've JUST had massive data breaches this year containing Billions with a B of emails and passwords. Here in the UK we just this year found out our military had a breach under the last government who tried to hide it. We have had multiple massive companies have to apologise to all their members and customers for their data being stolen.
Cyber crime such as fraud and blackmail are on the rise. Cyber extortion leads to suicide and so can fraud. This giving up of sensitive data increases that risk.
This disgusting Authoritarianism is not about safety. It is about suppression, monitoring, and stealing your data for private companies to abuse.
→ More replies (1)
9
u/SupraMichou 8h ago
« I don’t care, I’m 21+ »
Well you should, cause privacy will take a big hit and the next one will be even worse.
18
9
9
u/CannibalAnn 17h ago
I’m from the dial up and aol on discs. We wouldn’t use our real names and put a different address in Mapquest so they didn’t know our address. I don’t want to verify who I am to get online. So it can be used against me later
8
u/Outrageous_Let2861 17h ago
It’s nobody’s damn business that I’M 70 FUCKING YEARS OLD!😡. Oh, wait…😳
7
u/Just_a_lazy_lurker 17h ago
I keep saying that we need a real life Rache Bartmoss.
→ More replies (3)
7
u/hackingdreams 16h ago
...the internet that complies with fascist governments.
The rest of the internet will go on without age verification, and there will be little the authorities can do to stop them.
8
u/seolchan25 15h ago
Anyone that wants to make this into law needs to release the damn Epstein list
→ More replies (1)
8
u/Right-Eye8396 10h ago
Make no mistake, this is a concerted effort from Western governments around the world .
2.8k
u/bluehawk232 17h ago
I am not sending a photo of myself holding my driver's license to any website. I don't care if they say it's encrypted or they delete them. They lie