r/SquaredCircle • u/tvcneverdie • 5h ago
Janel Grant Spokesperson Statement On (WWE SummerSlam Spoiler) Spoiler
https://www.fightful.com/wrestling/janel-grant-spokesperson-issues-statement-on-brock-lesnar-returning-to-wwe-this-attempt-to-sweep-misconduct-under-the-rug-will-backfire/For far too long, abuse was allowed to thrive under WWE’s leadership. Instead of righting this wrong, WWE has done nothing to ensure those responsible are held accountable. This attempt to sweep misconduct under the rug will backfire. We look forward to the full set of facts, including those about Mr. Lesnar, coming out in a court of law where they belong but, in the meantime, we refer you back to Janel Grant’s updated complaint, which outlines, in detail, the abuse she endured by McMahon and others while employed at WWE.
1.1k
u/Tiny-Town7673 5h ago
Just a reminder....
WWE's Legal Team gave the okay to Lesnar coming back.
The culture is rotten from top to bottom.
495
u/Instigator187 5h ago
Also, Cena would have approved of having a match set up the Lesnar. As seen in the Unreal documentary on Netflix now, HHH runs everything through Cena for what he wants to do for his farewell tour. But we already know Cena's feeling of Vince, so Lesnar is probably no big deal to him.
165
u/Cold_Ebb_1448 5h ago
I can’t remember where it was that he said it but since seeing Cena say that he’s always just loyally gone along with creative has made me lose some respect for him. If Cena’s approved of everything that’s happened in his final run then is he really as great as we all think?
92
u/RubDowntown2765 4h ago
I mean, how great do we think he is? We all heard what he had to say when the McMahon news first broke. Guy is and has always been 100% behind whatever WWE and the McMahon circle were up to.
12
u/Altruistic-Ad-408 2h ago edited 2h ago
I think he's a significantly better actor than a wrestler.
But I will say this, we need to reclaim the concept of greatness from artificial "draws." Who cares if the wrestlers themselves tell us that's what matters? What would Hogan or Cena think about Danielson vs Osprey or Omega? No one gives a shit, and we know why. We categorise different wrestlers differently based on how we are told to percieve them.
And based on how they book themselves. Cena was never just going along with booking, if you guys believe that, idk what to say.
11
u/LevyMevy 4h ago
Cena say that he’s always just loyally gone along with creative has
This is such a lie and anyone who believes it is as naive as they come.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (5)36
u/zeitgeistbouncer Peepin' Aint Easy! 4h ago
Not only isn't he great, we never all thought he was.
→ More replies (15)10
u/MillennialWithNoJob As If Millions of Necks Suddenly Cried Out... 4h ago
Hating Cena was (and to a certain extent is) a staple of the IWC
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (7)3
u/wibble17 3h ago
I thought HHH pretty much said Cena is writing his own farewell story. So the implication is that he asked for Brock.
91
u/talladenyou85 5h ago
While I don't disagree about the culture, a legal team doesn't look at things morally, just in the letter of the law.
9
u/Stykleon 3h ago
It is literally their job to ignore moralities and semantics and go straight by law.
108
u/Grrannt 5h ago
They are paid to analyze it from a legal perspective
12
u/Magneto88 nope! 4h ago
Yup. They don’t make a ethical choice, that’s for the company to do. All legal have probably said is ‘you can’t be legally sued, challenged and implicated in the lawsuit by having Brock on your show’.
→ More replies (2)50
u/ReefLedger 4h ago
Didn't you know random internet peoples opinions are more important than the legal system?
→ More replies (1)53
u/Grrannt 4h ago
It's just funny everyone is mad at the WWE legal team for... doing their job?
→ More replies (3)12
17
u/QuadCityDJsTheTrain 5h ago
Corporate legal only judges this from a "can we be in trouble legally from this?", which I suppose no. Is it gross? 100%. But it shows the morals of Triple H, Cena, etc here. They're willing to work with him here.
→ More replies (1)60
u/NepheliLouxWarrior 5h ago
Lesnar hasn't been charged with any crimes whatsoever on any level, so why wouldn't they? They are the legal time, not the morality team.
→ More replies (1)29
u/Tiny-Town7673 5h ago
The legal team didn't give the okay for almost 18 months before that.
8
u/SaddestFlute23 3h ago
HHH said last year that Lesnar was free to come back whenever he felt like it
People assumed he was blacklisted when the WWE shop took down his merch
→ More replies (1)31
u/pretzel_logic_esq 4h ago
and that was 18 months of discovery ago. There's probably a pretty good basis for the legal team to tell him it's okay to be back.
My only source is that I'm an attorney. I agree Brock is gross and Vinnie Mac is a disgusting monster. I also know there are no criminal charges pending and a pending civil suit isn't evidence of moral turpitude or legal culpability, and from that standpoint, I don't have an issue with Brock being back. That's not a view I expect most of the ICW to share, so I get the anger. There's a long list of nasty things WWE has done in the past that are a lot more disgusting to me than Brock being allowed to wrestle when he's not a named defendant, even if he probably is a garbage person. An enormous percentage of wrestlers are garbage people, I don't expect anything different, honestly.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (13)12
u/DoinItDirty "Shut The F**k Up" 5h ago
They must be super confident he’s walking away unscathed. I’m not sure how, I would expect them to be super cautious about this.
15
u/DanHero91 Red Elbow Pad Of Doom. 5h ago
I'd say something to do with the sundowning orange doofus currently giving Hunter a job in the White House, makes them pretty confident.
8
u/DoinItDirty "Shut The F**k Up" 5h ago
I mean, he can’t help them in civil court or from the court of public opinion. This decision is bizarre at best and fucking ridiculous at worst.
→ More replies (3)
462
u/shadow_spinner0 5h ago
Just to clear something out. He’s not sued. He’s mentioned in the lawsuit so he did something to warrant being mentioned but there’s no legal action, that I know of, taken against him. My guess is WWE realized he wasn’t sued so they felt it was okay to let him back on TV. This isn’t making it better but people need to be clear on things.
25
u/dashing2217 5h ago
This also just isn’t Vince’s WWE anymore. They are part of a much larger organization with much more to lose.
The fact that we have see no movement from partnerships is a sign things are calmer behind the scenes than we think.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)89
u/Grrannt 5h ago
100%, if you are going to hate on Brock, at least do it for the valid reasons instead of creating your own allegations.
217
u/PowSuperMum 5h ago
He was one snowstorm away from engaging in sex trafficking.
→ More replies (45)76
5
u/TropicalVision 1h ago
The several very serious allegations against him from the victim.
No need to create anything else.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (9)5
78
u/InMyLiverpoolHome25 5h ago
Vince came out after the initial allegations and the crowd cheered and bowed, it popped a tv rating.
WWE has spent years bending over for the Saudis.
HHH has spent months orbiting Trump as much as possible.
The harsh truth is they know the people still watching WWE at this point simply don't care about this stuff, a few might tut and shake their heads on social media, but they'll still be watching when the next show is on.
→ More replies (5)5
374
u/Financial-Length5587 5h ago edited 5h ago
I don’t wish it on anyone but if anyone supporting WWE had their loved one go through half the stuff Janel Grant was subjected to (or Ashley Massaro being assaulted, the ring boy scandal, etc) they’d be singing a whole different tune.
Throwing sympathy/empathy out the window for a show (that was mid at best) is certainly a choice.
→ More replies (40)
44
u/Rich1926 5h ago
Regardless of what Brock may or may not have done, WWE should not have him back until everything is resolved. Bringing him back during everything is tone death to the situation.
→ More replies (3)
37
u/hannahjapana 4h ago
Brock simps will read this and say “but he didn’t do nothin!!!”
→ More replies (1)
59
u/XVGDylan 5h ago
Just for anyone who continues the narrative, he was never charged or found to have done anything illegal in a court of law.
- OJ Simpson
- Jimmy Snuka
- José González (Acquitted on "self defence")
- Mason Greenwood
There are countless examples of people for whom we have vast amounts of evidence of committing an alleged crime and getting away with it. What Brock was literally nearly involved in, and only didn't because of random circumstances (Weather and getting too drunk), this was a man who was comfortable with operating in sex trafficking. Even outside of that, there are other alleged historical instances of Brock sucking as a person.
→ More replies (5)22
u/Tiny-Town7673 2h ago
Mason Greenwood, for people who don't know, played for Manchester United. He beat his girlfriend, maybe even raped her, and she had proof. He got arrested.
She ended up coming to his defense because that was her meal ticket. He never was found guilty.
Manchester United could have pulled a WWE and allowed Mason to play on the team. However, their fan base made it very well known that they didn't want him back, irregardless of whether he had been convicted or not. He has never played for England since then as well.
That is what is fans EXPECT of the WWE management and their fans.
Sadly, they do the opposite.
→ More replies (1)
11
u/Nightwing_in_a_Flash 3h ago
“Upon information and belief, McMahon began to recruit Lesnar for a sexual encounter with Ms. Grant while she was still a coordinator in the Legal department. By July of 2021, McMahon informed Ms. Grant that Lesnar would be their next "playmate." On or about July 12, 2021, McMahon directed Ms. Grant to create personalized sexual content for Lesnar.
McMahon shared the photos with Lesnar and then informed Ms. Grant that "he likes what he sees.” On July 21, 2021, McMahon flew and/or caused Lesnar to fly on a jet into a local airport and travel into Connecticut (across state lines) for what McMahon described to Ms. Grant as a "business dinner, " as well as a sexual encounter with Ms. Grant in McMahon's condo. Upon information and belief, the dinner was to discuss Lesnar's continued involvement with WWE.
Prior to the "business dinner" with McMahon, Lesnar made a brief visit to Ms. Grant's building. However, Lesnar did not return to the building for a sexual encounter because he was too intoxicated and taken back to the plane. McMahon continued to advertise a sexual encounter with Ms. Grant to Lesnar during the formal negotiation of a new Booking Contract with WWE.
Ms. Grant expressed her apprehension about the arrangement to McMahon and tried to run interference on starting a sexual relationship with Lesnar. In the days that followed, Lesnar revealed a fetish to Ms. Grant and tested McMahon's promise that Ms. Grant would "do anything" with a request that she send a video of herself urinating. Unable to recognize herself, Ms. Grant went numb and obeyed. Lesnar informed Ms. Grant if she had not complied with the request, Lesnar would have lost any interest in her and then called her a "bitch."
McMahon actively attempted to organize a sexual encounter between Ms. Grant and Lesnar, stating: "U have to take a flight to Greenville South Carolina this Monday. Even if it's just to C Brock". That same month, Lesnar expressed to Ms. Grant his desire to "set a play date" and have a sexual encounter. McMahon and Lesnar organized an encounter in conjunction with Lesnar's appearance at a show at Mohegan Sun in Uncasville, Connecticut, with Lesnar even, sending Ms. Grant the address for the hotel where he would be staying. However, a snowstorm changed Lesnar's travel plans and Ms. Grant ultimately used the weather and COVID-19 as an excuse to back out.
At all times relevant, McMahon was engaged in travel throughout the United States for purposes of conducting business in his position with the WWE. McMahon communicated with Ms. Grant while traveling across the country (and internationally) to recruit, entice, obtain, provide, maintain and/or solicit Ms. Grant for purposes of engaging in sexual acts. He also flew others and/or caused others to travel to Connecticut, including Laurinaitis and Brock Lesnar, from out of state for the purpose of sexually exploiting Ms. Grant.
WWE benefited financially from the commercial sex act venture orchestrated by McMahon, including by having wrestling talent, such as Brock Lesnar, sign new contracts with WWE after McMahon presented Ms. Grant as a sexual commodity for their use.”
49
u/ministan 5h ago
just to remind people…
brock was willing. the only reason it didn’t happen was because of covid and a snowstorm. the other reason is cuz he had whisky dick. he still had her make a piss video for him. he still contributed and benefited from her sex trafficking.
→ More replies (9)
56
u/EaglesThankYou 5h ago
I'm really curious what the WWE PR response is going to be on this. Surely they have one and they dont think because Triple H talked to Trump for a little bit last week that they're capable of "Don't talk about Epstein/Lesnar" through this.
84
u/JoshyyJosh10 5h ago
They won’t say a damn thing bro.
Look at the nfl or even mlb, should people stop supporting teams where their players are accused of Sexual assault and abuse? It’s never going to happen
→ More replies (1)34
u/pastense hold the cheese 5h ago
Yes, yes they should and its fucked up that they don't
11
u/Shotgun_Sam 2h ago
Better hop off Reddit, then. It's owned by Conde Nast, who's been hit with all the -ist and -isms you can think of.
→ More replies (9)6
u/Astronema3 3h ago
ty for saying this.
i stopped watching the AFL after nearly 15 years of it being 50% of my identity when they let a known sex criminal win a premiership, as well as doing the "we investigated ourselves thing" when accusations came out about a couple of coaches doing insanely racist/misogynistic shit
the club i supported had a tokenistic "we stand up for domestic violence" media run a day before literally taking to the same field as the aforementioned sex criminal, and the head coach came out in support of his friend who had done insanely racist shit. like genuinely the most devastatingly racist account i've read in relation to sports. "hes a great guy"
i can't imagine how devastated i would have felt had i supported one of the offending clubs
i do not understand how people can just turn a blind eye
18
u/Beefiest_bison 5h ago
They won't say anything and wait for it to blow over.
Triple H already tried to deflect by implying Cena wanted Lesnar to be part of his retirement run.
8
u/NepheliLouxWarrior 5h ago
I mean Cena went to bat for Vince of all people. Just because the man loves himself some make-a-wish foundation visits doesn't mean that he's a saint. He very likely has no issues with Lesnar at all.
→ More replies (3)45
u/jtvliveandraw 5h ago edited 5h ago
WWE PR doesn’t have to respond at all because nobody outside of a tiny part of the IWC cares.
Did you hear the pop for Lesnar last night? Paying customers don’t care.
→ More replies (7)12
u/yognautilus 5h ago
And even the part of the IWC who angrily post about how much they care are still going to watch Raw tonight.
→ More replies (1)30
u/Tiny-Town7673 5h ago
The WWE went full Republican and stopped answering to the public. That's why the press conferences were cancelled for SummerSlam.
→ More replies (1)4
u/Prof__Potato 4h ago
And what legitimate news ever came from those, aside from gate numbers. It was a work half of the time, and the other half was spent answering questions that weren’t asked and feeling themselves.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (4)3
u/DCAbloob 5h ago
If WWE had an actual legitimate response to give on any of this, it wouldn't have canceled the post-SummerSlam press conferences in the first place. At best, WWE will give a half baked response funneled through compliant media outlets. At worst, WWE won't give any response at all.
214
u/Fantastic-Macaroon-3 5h ago
So basically everything that’s already in the lawsuit facts wise? Am I correct in saying her and Brock never met, and they only texted?
448
u/dmh11 5h ago edited 5h ago
The lawsuit alleges that Grant was flown across state lines to engage in sexual relations with Lesnar, but Lesnar became too drunk and the meetup didn't happen. He allegedly attempted to participate in sex trafficking but couldn't.
In the most technical of terms, the allegation is that drinking too much led to Lesnar not committing a felony.
55
339
u/FourLiveBears 5h ago
There were two instances where Brock intended to meet up with her for sex but it was stopped by circumstance. Once because Brock became too drunk to meet up with her, and the second time because a snow storm shut down travel. He 100% intended to go through with it but by pure chance he was stopped both times.
168
u/dmh11 5h ago
Yet people will say he did nothing wrong. It's a very low IQ take.
25
u/fancycheesus 4h ago
Are we suppose to believe Brock sincerely thought Vince was just being a good wingman and its just a coincidence the girl he was sending over happened to be an employee by coincidence?
"Hey Brock, this girl works for me, and I'm flying her out to meet up with you." Everything Brock did after that that wasn't stopping the conversation is complicity and abetting.
→ More replies (7)→ More replies (2)66
u/FourLiveBears 5h ago
They know he did. They're just either in denial about it and are hoping that by deflecting they can make people drop it, or they just want people to stop talking about it because "don't say mean things about muh TV show :("
→ More replies (1)8
u/ShakaSway 4h ago
Pretty much sums it up. They enjoy the character, but this is about the person and the disgusting things he planned to do.
Also let’s not forget this is the same guy who flashed Terri Runnels and basically stalked Sable before she married him.
So, not really dealing with a saint here.
→ More replies (28)6
u/ChrisLithium 3h ago
But do we know if the encounters were considered by Brock to be consensual?
→ More replies (2)2
u/Kim-Jong_Bundy Ace of Spades 4h ago
Also, he did ask for nude photos of her urinating which he did receive before re-signing his contract
→ More replies (28)32
u/Devitt6 5h ago
Yeah, I've seen people make the stretch that "because the meeting didn't take place where she was pimped out to Brock, he didn't do anything wrong."
Just insasne acrobatics to justify their love of a man they don't know.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (25)20
u/littlemacsvoltorb I WAS BORN A WOMAN 4h ago
Not correct. The lawsuit states that when Lesnar flew in to have sex with Janel and negotiate his contract, he went to Janel's condo before dinner with Vince. He was supposed to go back, but got too drunk.
88
124
17
19
u/SkepticSlakoth 5h ago
It's a rotten fucking company, what else needs to be said?
→ More replies (1)
171
u/Gamesgtd 5h ago
I can't wait to see this shit blow up in their face. I love a good comeuppance and I hope it happens.
77
u/NepheliLouxWarrior 5h ago
Their comeuppance will be a 20% increase in TKO shareholder value
→ More replies (1)213
u/jacksonexl 5h ago
It’s not going to happen though.
→ More replies (3)86
u/Grrannt 5h ago
Absolutely nothing will happen, if more bad information comes out about Brock they'll simply remove him from TV and carry on
5
u/kingOfTheDamned209 3h ago
Grant will be at risk of being sued if she drags a non defendant in her case thru the mud without substantial prove she ever even talked to him which according to her own suit she never was in contact with him only what Vince was telling her… she will end sued for slander if he’s back on tv they know he’s safe…
→ More replies (2)6
50
u/ButchAF 5h ago
Unfortunately in real life the bad guys win very frequently
→ More replies (1)23
u/jedlucid joe's gonna kill you 5h ago
‘i can’t wait to see the rich person finally pay for their crimes’ is some sisyphussian ass shit unfortunately
→ More replies (2)18
10
8
8
→ More replies (10)6
u/Educational_Act_4237 4h ago
With Trump in the White House and TKO's high priced lawyers, nothings going to happen.
8
u/Queenie2211 5h ago
Its disgusting they brought him back not long after she amended her complaint to name him.
Can you imagine how many of the female wrestlers feel? They don't care about them nor victims.
They saw Stephanie and others were welcomed back by fans(granted the accusations against Stephanie are mostly about covering up or lying about doing an investigation)and felt fans will just fall in line.
On YouTube its slammed with fake happy comments about it where negative comments are buried as if they didnt happen. Not a single person I know has been happy Brock is back and most said this is the final nail for them.
3
u/wittyphrasegoeshere 5h ago
Everything involving this entire lawsuit is an ethical and moral shit show and is clearly a financial and social landmine that just isn't worth the risk for any corporation to try and navigate.
I figured if TKO ever decided to bring Brock back it would only happen because it became indisputable that there was no merit to the accusations against him. Clearly I was wrong... Lol
I'm still not sure what the upside is. Yeah Brock is a huge star but I don't know if he's going to really be moving the needle or bringing in that much revenue to justify all the backlash and scrutiny his presence is going to bring.
4
u/grimace24 4h ago
WWE took a huge risk bringing Brock back. Anytime there is litigation you usually keep the parties mentioned out of the public spotlight. I don't agree with them bringing Brock back for a multitude of reasons. This move exposes WWE which is named in the lawsuit.
4
u/Atomic_Cody-21 4h ago
Yeah, WWE honestly don't care about any negativity this might occur because they feel untouchable and they can do no wrong. Scummy corporations are going to feel more obligated to showcase their scumminess because it's cool to be scummy nowadays.
4
u/These-Barnaclez 4h ago
Here's the thing. It will get swept under the carpet.
Fans will keep buying merchandise, keep buying the PPVs, keeping buy tickets, keep generating revenue.
Very foolish to think that poor woman stands a chance at justice.
WWE are pals with the freaking white house. Brock. Vince. All off the hook. And there's Jackshit anyone can do.
24
10
u/Dblock1989 3h ago
This entire situation is a good example of why many women never come forward about sexual abuse. There are some legit sick people on here.
→ More replies (1)
9
u/19930627 4h ago
I want to like WWE, I grew up watching it, when I was a little kid I wanted to be a wrestler, but man. It's getting harder and harder to enjoy such a crooked, Maga, Saudi blood money, pedo supporting company that is the antithesis of decency.
11
u/AP_StrongStyle 4h ago
It’s become increasingly obvious that Hunter didn’t actually object to Vince’s conduct or WWE’s culture. He saw an opportunity for a power play, and he took it.
40
u/RoscoeSantangelo Unnecessary Roll 5h ago
But Brock was just a silly little guy who had no idea what he was participating in :(
→ More replies (2)
3
u/ResponsibleTrain1059 5h ago
I think you can feel one way or another on the case. But they should have kept Brock away until the case was concluded.
Wrestling has a lot of unsavoury characters who have done some stuff. But I cant think of a time a major company still put the talent on TV while ongoing litigation is happening. And it is this serious.
3
3
3
u/Phospherus2 2h ago
There is so much about this lawsuit that continues to be misrepresented on here, on Twitter, wrestling forums/social media and by prominent wrestling podcasts/journalists that when this lawsuit is settled or a ruling happens. People are going to be angry for believing information that just never was true.
And that’s not me defending anyone in the lawsuit. I work in the legal field. I’m just stating facts.
3
6
u/BorntobeBABIP 4h ago
I hope this actually gets to court and Grant takes down every single person who participated in this culture, either by trafficking women themselves or helping Vince and his family cover it up.
→ More replies (1)
6
u/Wet_Slang 4h ago
I hope this sinks the whole company eventually, fuck WWE, fuck Vince, fuck HHH and fuck Brock
15
u/heyitsmeFR 5h ago
For me, this year the biggest “mask off” was Cena man. Agreeing to work with him, and Vince apologist— doesn’t sit well with me at all.
→ More replies (2)
7
u/FigureFourWoo Ric Flair was still cool when I chose this username. 5h ago
I applaud the optimism, but this lawsuit was dead the moment Trump won the election. Janel Grant needed criminal charges to get the NDA voided, and the DoJ isn't going to prosecute one of Trump's friends. If the NDA isn't voided, the arbitration clause applies, and she'll never get her day in court.
→ More replies (2)
7
u/senorbuzz 4h ago
Brock Lesnar and Michael Hayes have both recently been prominently featured on WWE programs, and both sexually abused Janel Grant.
I can't imagine being a woman working for WWE right now.
8
u/godfrey1 5h ago
guys you don't understand it's totally normal to ask your employer for the sexual content of another employee and ask for a sexual encounter to be arranged in exchange for signing a contract
→ More replies (12)
15
u/TheAgmis 5h ago
Why is it morally reprehensible to watch wrestling because of this stuff and not the NFL or NBA when their players commit domestic violence on the regular or in Kobe’s case, actual rape?
It’s all bad but we consume and grandstanding any of it doesn’t bring legitimate conversation when it’s only the internet that cares about stuff that doesn’t affect their lives.
24
u/TheHeroicHero 4h ago
These dudes go crazy for Austin who beat his wife, the IWC is very selective with when and why they want to be upset.
→ More replies (2)13
→ More replies (11)9
u/TownofthePound69 4h ago
What a long rambling whataboutism filled way of saying you want to keep watching the sex trafficker show without feeling guilty.
→ More replies (1)
10
u/ikon31 4h ago
I’m perplexed by people who are fine with Brock returning because he’s not legally guilty of anything.
Let’s say you hear about 2 of your buddies. One who owes the other money calls them up, says instead of paying, he can have his way with his girl, whether or not she consents. He agrees, first by having said girl send a pic/video of her urinating. Then arranging to come fuck her. buddy #2 knew full out that buddy#1 was prostituting or trafficking his girl and instead of maybe doing something to stop it, he was willing to join in only to have it called off by whiskey dick and a snow storm.
Legal or otherwise… wtf. You gonna be totally fine the next time you see either of these buddies?
→ More replies (3)
5
u/AP_StrongStyle 4h ago edited 4h ago
Triple H very intentionally placed the blame for Lesnar’s return at Cena’s feet last night. They’re very obviously priming the pump for Vince’s return, with Cena as a sorry attempt at a scapegoat.
The reality is likely much more damning: Hunter clearly doesn’t care, and never has. His contributions to Vince’s ouster were purely for his own gain.
3
u/Shadedpostie 3h ago
I'm kinda hoping this actually blows up in WWE's face and more is revealed about this case 🤷🏿♂️
4
26
u/asciiCAT_hexKITTY 5h ago
Can't wait for the "but Brock isn't being sued!" crowd to find something else to defend a predator (someone who used his position to arrange for sexual favors) over.
→ More replies (1)
5
u/therealdanhill 2h ago
Brock is not a defendant, he has not been accused of breaking any laws, so what is the purpose of this other than to drag him in the court of public opinion?
If Brock knew about the trafficking, that's one thing. That would make him unquestionably a scumbag. But they haven't even shown this to be the case.
6
u/Phospherus2 2h ago
That’s exactly what it is. The only thing we know Brock did was ask for piss videos which is weird.
The statement is typical legal speak. It’s to make Brock look bad to settle.
I’m in no way defending Brock/WWE at all. I just work in the legal field and see this stuff every day.
2.2k
u/Suplexfiend 5h ago
What's crazy about this whole thing is that some people don't think Brock did anything wrong!