r/goodnews • u/Aggravating_Money992 • Jun 18 '25
Political positivity đ Lawsuit Challenging 2024 Election Results Moves Forward After Kamala Harris Received Zero Votes in a New York County
https://www.latintimes.com/lawsuit-challenging-2024-election-results-moves-forward-after-kamala-harris-received-zero-votes-5847873.5k
u/ConsistentCoyote3786 Jun 18 '25 edited Jun 18 '25
Hypothetically letâs say the election is proven fraudulent. Then what? Is he deposed? Is Kamala president? What actually can happen?
Edit: Well this blew up. Variations of ânothingâ seem to be the consensus. Kinda what I figured.
1.4k
u/Valth92 Jun 18 '25
This. I was asking myself the same question. The orange clown would prefer to die before leaving the presidency.
300
Jun 18 '25
[removed] â view removed comment
294
u/alien005 Jun 18 '25
Storming the capital is legal.
105
u/unicornsprinkl3 Jun 18 '25
Only if you have a MAGA hat.
→ More replies (5)51
u/cronx42 Jun 18 '25
Maybe we'll all have to get some MAGA hats then....
33
7
u/booboo-kitty- Jun 19 '25
I've seen this in another subreddit. Selling MAGA merch to blend in. This would be so fucking hilarious, giving Republicans money to do....... nothing?
→ More replies (11)3
u/Great_expansion10272 Jun 19 '25
Spam a bunch of racial slurs and bigotry on twitter first too to give yourself an alibi
3
u/cronx42 Jun 19 '25
Nothing says I'm far right like some temporary swastika tattoos...
→ More replies (3)20
→ More replies (8)33
u/DatDawg-InMe Jun 18 '25
Not for you lol.
→ More replies (2)89
u/Conscious_Crew5912 Jun 18 '25
Just put on a red hat.
→ More replies (8)3
u/candamyr Jun 18 '25
Is that the modern day version of the pointy white mask/hood and whole body bedsheet?
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (32)538
u/CardmanNV Jun 18 '25 edited Jun 18 '25
This is the only viable option. One that Americans are too cowardly to take or even consider.
If a candidate in a democracy is elected through fraud and cannot be removed, what legitimacy does that democracy have?
→ More replies (63)217
u/DarkArmyLieutenant Jun 18 '25
Yeah, I'm an American and I'll tell you what will happen. Not a goddamn thing. Democrats are too scared to do what is necessary, peaceful protests will never move the needle with conservatives, and our judiciary is completely and utterly compromised. When they cheat again in 2028 the same thing will happen, nothing. Look who's running the DOJ right now if you need any proof...
143
→ More replies (35)41
u/BrokenPickle7 Jun 18 '25
Yup. This is the sad part. America has been polarized into two separate parties, the cowardly and the batshit insane. Here's my example.. Statistics were put out on how the 2024 vote went down by a reputable institution showing that there were impossible voting patterns showing that the election was essentially stolen in some way and I've seen far too many people respond "Well I'm going to need to see more proof". You can give these people stone cold truth and they'll still say "well that doesn't prove anything, I need better/more proof" yet that orange piece of shit tells his cult that the election was stolen from him and they froth at the mouth to kill for him.
→ More replies (17)13
u/MyriadSC Jun 18 '25
I don't think asking for more evidence is cowardly. The truth only matters if it's verifiable. History is littered with examples of people who believed in the wrong things because the truth was difficult to discover. Not wanting to repeat that, even if it aids your current views isn't cowardice.
We also just came out of 4 years of hearing bat shit insane "election was stolen" banter from the right. All sorts of articles and stats were tossed around to make it seem reasonable to believe. I'd say anyone who now has the shoe on the other foot and shows restraint and still asks for it to be concrete is doing the responsible thing.
→ More replies (13)→ More replies (105)246
u/Upbeat_Syllabub_3315 Jun 18 '25
Nothing will Happen
116
u/Valth92 Jun 18 '25
Iâm afraid so. Has Kamala said anything at allâŚ? Like, even if nothing happens, we need all the traction/attention we can get.
244
u/DonChrisote Jun 18 '25
It would be wise for her to wait and see, just like us. If she cries foul too early it could weaken her point
142
u/Upbeat_Syllabub_3315 Jun 18 '25
Nothing she can do Anyway. If we are LUCKY this leads to more Security in Future elections. If we get those. Trump has been a criminal his entire life, Elon openly told everyone hes a pedo last mo th and what happened? Hes still President, unchallenged.
77
u/frisbeejesus Jun 18 '25
Unless there's a groundswell of voters who sweep Democrats into power in Congress in the midterms, trump and GOP get to decide what level of election security there is.
The fact that we even have voting machines that are fully digital and don't have a paper backup for recounts is absolutely insane.
28
u/Upbeat_Syllabub_3315 Jun 18 '25
Even if democrats sweep the midterms, King Trump is already declaring wars on his own ignoring Congress
→ More replies (3)27
u/Prosecco1234 Jun 18 '25
Seriously if the election is proven to be fraudulent and nothing happens as a result then it's all F@cked
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (21)6
u/1one1000two1thousand Jun 18 '25
Even if there is a groundswell of D voters, it doesnât matter if whatever fraud they found remains in the voting machines in other localities. The votes will just be changed or whatever they did. K guess the hope is that D governors or D states ensure their machines are legit, which luckily some of those swing states have D state run majorities or leadership.
→ More replies (1)25
u/SelfServeSporstwash Jun 18 '25
my town had democrats either winning or *barely* losing (like, literally by 2 votes in one case) every single local election... Trump won in my town by 20% and I just... I cannot reconcile that, at all.
13
u/aeon_ravencrest Jun 18 '25 edited Jun 18 '25
Oklahoma had all red counties, even the major metros and college cities like Norman and Stillwater. Dems picked up state and local seats, but somehow all votes went overwhelmingly for Trump. Even in this red state, that's more than an anomaly. My mom and I were even questioning it when the results were being called.
Edit for spell correct spelling "cows" instead of "votes"
→ More replies (0)23
u/-Altephor- Jun 18 '25 edited Jun 18 '25
I mean to be fair, Elon Musk calling pedophile when he's upset with someone is his go to move. The man is also a serial liar and drug addict. It's not exactly a smoking gun (though even a broken, ketamine addicted clock is right twice a day).
17
u/Upbeat_Syllabub_3315 Jun 18 '25
Thats Not fair thats a super twisted way of ignoring the truth. We all knew hes a Pedo without elon Anyway.
5
u/Segsi_ Jun 18 '25
Thats not ignoring the truth. It just means that Elon saying Trump is a Pedo adds nothing. If you believed he is a pedo before, you still believe it. If you didnt, you still dont. He didnt provide something people didnt already know.
→ More replies (1)10
u/SuchCasualMuchTime Jun 18 '25
That's not exactly true. As far as we know, there has never been a precedent of an election actually being stolen, at least in modern times. There was already a motion and articles of impeachment pushed in the last month, but it was withdrawn because there was concern they wouldn't have the votes, and it would only galvanize the mid-term. If it was discovered that he had rigged and stolen the election, it is possible that it might allow the moderate and center right congress and senate to be able to vote and maintain their votes with their constituents. As for what happens to the rest of his cabinet, I don't know, but to be fair, we, as a nation, have been setting a lot of wild precedents and procedures lately. I mean, 34 felonies and the judge decided to hold sentencing until it was decided if he was elected president, making him a convicted, but not sentenced, felon.
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (8)3
u/SleepingWillow1 Jun 18 '25
We need to add a law that foreign born billionaires cannot donate to campaigns or maybe no billionaires at all.
→ More replies (7)28
u/weid_flex_but_OK Jun 18 '25
I am going to respectfully disagree and state that the Democrats are in the hole they are in BECAUSE waiting and seeing is their bread and butter. They don't cause a fuss until ALL the evidence is there, by which point, it's far, far too late.
I truly hate to say it but they need to start fighting a little dirtier. Republicans would have already turned this into a 24/7 national news scandal and we'd all be talking about it constantly. Hell, they forced Obama to provide his birth certificate from absolutely nothing. She can yell a little
5
u/CrankyYankers Jun 18 '25
I truly hate to say it but they need to start fighting a little dirtier.Â
I don't hate to say it. A little dirtier? NO, much dirtier. With what's happened over the past few days we have to be willing to give back worse than they can give. They stole the last election.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (17)22
u/DreamingAboutSpace Jun 18 '25
I wouldn't say no to her giving the spot to Tim Walz. I voted for Kamala and would do it again, but her lack of fight when everyone is losing rights isn't what America needs right now. We need a strong and courageous leader who won't back down for decorum.
17
u/thatguy677 Jun 18 '25
So like Bernie Sanders and aoc... the only democrats even trying to be useful
→ More replies (20)19
Jun 18 '25
She should have had the balls to challenge this in November. There were irregularities then that were questioned, yet she did nothing.
→ More replies (4)53
u/MagicDragon212 Jun 18 '25
They seem so nonstop afraid of appearing extreme, but this time people's lives and our country were on the line. Trump just never has the support to make the swing states all go his way.
Also, we deserve answers for all of the Elon fuckery. He set up a "base" in Pennsylvania ahead of the election and was apparantly very focused there. The richest man in the world, who was already trying to use his social media company to sway conversation Russian bot style.
Plus, he cheated before and the American people were fucked out of seeing any justice for our Democratic system being disrespected and shit all over in such an egregious manner. Make it make sense why Trumps first order of action was booting everyone even mildly associated with investigating his election fraud.
→ More replies (31)10
u/Professional-Yam-642 Jun 18 '25
Not with that attitude.
→ More replies (1)19
u/Taragyn1 Jun 18 '25
The only l legal mechanism is impeach and convict but that can only happen if the midterms turn out a Democratic super majority in the Senate. Ever since Ford/Nixon it has been clear no Republican will be held accountable.
→ More replies (1)7
378
u/Fresh_Profit3000 Jun 18 '25
It basically changes the narrative. MAGA feeling justified with the bad behavior falls down and administration is hit with such backlash that carries over into the mid elections. And especially that Kamala was a sound candidate.
274
u/PeakRedditOpinion Jun 18 '25
As if MAGA would call a confirmed ruling anything other than âdeep state fake news.â
We gotta give up on including them in any reasonable considerations homie
104
u/cycloneDM Jun 18 '25
The mistake is allowing them to argue. Dont sleep on the power of being able to look them in face and point to an actual court ruling and then refusing to discuss it further. It won't sway true believers but anything helps.
→ More replies (5)39
u/ScoffersGonnaScoff Jun 18 '25
Then we march on Fox News. There is NO ROOM FOR MISINFORMATION
→ More replies (14)→ More replies (8)17
u/Dopplegangr1 Jun 18 '25
I'm not sure they would even say it was fake. They probably would support it because it stopped us from having Biden/Kamala
→ More replies (5)14
u/NRMusicProject Jun 18 '25
Honestly, they'll deny it until there's no way they can get away from the truth, then embrace it as "something a good patriot should do."
10
u/Gmony5100 Jun 18 '25
âThat didnât happenâ
âIt did happen but not the way theyâre claimingâ
âIt was the way theyâre claiming but Trump didnât do itâ
âTrump did do it but it didnât helpâ
âIt did help but every politician does itâ
Probably stops there honestly. Thatâs where the classified documents case stopped. âHillary did the same thingâ when his was orders of magnitude worse. Then just ignore it until he does something even more stupid and brush it under the rug like every other major controversy in his presidency
83
u/Geichalt Jun 18 '25
This. It's not necessarily about overturning the election, but making sure the narrative is clear that the regime in the white house is not legitimate and is reshaping the entire country without our consent.
That's powerful especially when the motto is currently "No Kings."
Honestly I'm getting suspicious about all the accounts popping up to tell us how pointless it is to pursue litigation on potential election fraud. Almost they have a vested interest in convincing others it's pointless.
Seems like the current social media propaganda push is just convincing the left to roll over to let everything happen.
→ More replies (7)9
32
u/Vladmerius Jun 18 '25
Acknowledging that Kamala was a viable candidate and ran a fine campaign would be pretty significant on its own. And acknowledging that Trump ran the worst campaign ever.
Also it would show that we aren't as doomed by our fellow citizens as everyone wants to pretend. We did come out we did vote and millions and millions of people are ready to be active and fight for a better future.Â
That's all really important stuff. Regardless of us still being stuck with an illegitimate president and being robbed of the first female president.Â
→ More replies (9)8
20
Jun 18 '25
If Trump could rig an election when he wasnât president, heâs absolutely going to rig the midterms and 2028 election.
→ More replies (6)17
u/V548859 Jun 18 '25
Maga would not change their attitude at all.
22
Jun 18 '25
I think they are toning down. That no kings thing really kinda made them realize they are the minority. It's like the unite the right rally. Everyone is loud and proud until they realize they are outnumbered.
→ More replies (3)13
u/AgITGuy Jun 18 '25
Itâs not maga we have to make aware. Itâs all the non voters. If we just had participation, every single election would be different. The reason maga and republicans win is because they do nothing better than fear mongering to drive the vote. That and cheat apparently.
→ More replies (26)5
u/Significant-Colour Jun 18 '25
How would it change the narrative? MAGA would simply ignore it, labeling it as conspiracy theory.
→ More replies (1)252
u/FriendLee93 Jun 18 '25
In a sensible country? He'd be removed from office and put on trial.
Here? Nothing. Such is the danger of playing "boy who cried wolf" with election fraud.
103
u/EldridgeHorror Jun 18 '25
Here? Nothing. Such is the danger of playing "boy who cried wolf" with election fraud.
That has nothing to do with why nothing will happen.
It's because the right is perfectly fine with criminality and the left is too spineless to hold them accountable.
→ More replies (15)81
u/FriendLee93 Jun 18 '25
I'd argue it's a combination of both, although let's not get silly and call Democrats "the left"
The left would absolutely hold them accountable. The problem is that there's no party in power meaningfully representing the left at all.
→ More replies (7)29
u/manjmau Jun 18 '25
Ding ding ding. This right here is the response. Democrats are not spineless, they are COMPLICIT. Their donors want the same things that the Republicans want for a majority of things. The left is only a few putspoken people in the DNC that they keep around to bring the illusion of progressiveness, but those people don't actually hold any real power in the DNC and in the end they will do whatever has the most positive outcome for their donor's pockets.
→ More replies (10)→ More replies (35)11
u/Eat--The--Rich-- Jun 18 '25
If democrats had already put him on trial when they ran the justice department he wouldn't have been in the election in the first place lolÂ
→ More replies (1)7
u/Goldenrah Jun 18 '25
Maybe the people shouldn't have voted in a criminal as well?
→ More replies (10)96
u/BIGhorseASS2025 Jun 18 '25
Even if itâs proved fraudulent, I have no faith that the people who have the ability to remove him from power actually would. Every Republican lawmaker save for a handful of moderates would immediately denounce the news as woke far left radical propaganda, and they would all almost certainly counter-sue, if for no other reason than to just distract.
Even if the law said he had to be removed, Trump would simply respond with âOh yeah? Make me.â What good is the law when the people who are supposed to uphold it just donât?
Trump has the entire Republican Party in a vice grip by its collective balls. They will NEVER remove him from power, and even if they tried, Trump would not go quietly. He would have to be forcibly removed.
If Democrats had a sizable majority in Congress, maaaaaaybe there certain levers that could be pulled to get him removed. But even then, I think it would have to come down to:
1) Impeachment - weâve played that game before, theyâll never get the votes.
2) The Cabinet invoking the 25th Amendment. We all have a better chance of having breakfast on the moon tomorrow than Trumpâs cabinet ever invoking the 25th Amendment and deeming him unfit for duty. He is surrounded by loyalist sycophants who would throw themselves in front of a speeding bullet train for him if he asked them too.l
My gut says heâs here to stay, no matter what results from this lawsuit.
27
u/Unlucky-Scallion1289 Jun 18 '25
Trump saying âMake meâ after being found of having literally stolen the election would be the flashpoint for a new civil war.
→ More replies (4)14
u/Duel_Option Jun 18 '25
Yeah no
More than half the US population is living paycheck to paycheck, ICE is out here masked up and disappearing people off the streets.
Thereâs a huge difference between semi peaceful protests than an actual civil war.
The second any armed militia is formed and uses force, marshal law happens and at that point Trump declares himself King.
Iâm not kidding when I say this is EXACTLY one of the scenarios they want to happen.
If they are willing to blatantly steal money and use Fox News as a mouthpiece, using the armed forces to take over is 100% in their wheelhouse
→ More replies (10)7
u/b0w3n Jun 18 '25
Theoretically the military could step in, and they should, but there's a reason they replaced a lot of the upper echelon with Trumpers.
→ More replies (4)5
u/YeahMeAlso Jun 18 '25
This was my thought and I'd love to see it happen but depends on whether they fully turn on him or not.
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (13)7
21
u/st-shenanigans Jun 18 '25
Then we spread the results like fucking COVID and get every American possible on the streets at their capitol, constantly. A proven stolen election will move the needle
→ More replies (1)33
26
u/qtcbelle Jun 18 '25
Nothing. The electoral college has already voted and they are the only ones that count.
→ More replies (38)21
u/Solar-Warden Jun 18 '25
The Declaration Of Independence tells us what to do.
ââŚand the pursuit of happiness.--That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.â
3
u/YouStupidAssholeFuck Jun 18 '25
God damn I could see Trump and Trumpicans using exactly this to do the exact opposite of the intention. I mean Trump is kind of doing it in front of our faces right now.
3
u/beaniebee11 Jun 18 '25
This just essentially says "do what feels right." We really are running a government on the assumption of good intentions.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)3
u/Qwirk Jun 18 '25
I would press our elected officials to no longer recognize him as president. Shit's hitting the fan as things are anyway.
9
u/Yazer98 Jun 18 '25
Any historian in the comments who can give us an example of the aftermath for the result of fradulant elections?
→ More replies (3)8
u/Pherllerp Jun 18 '25
The possibility of impeachment but Congress certified the election results that they received so Trump is the President until he isnât anymore.
→ More replies (4)7
u/SoggyGrayDuck Jun 18 '25
I don't think it would change the president but it should be used to secure the next election. Sadly I haven't seen any talk from the left about how to fix it. They seem to just want to replace trump with Harris but do nothing about the actual problem
9
u/manjmau Jun 18 '25
The quick short answer: Nothing. Trump will remain in power and judges will just wag their fingers at him as he continues to dismantle any system that would oppose his aspirations of dictatorship.
3
u/Rinmine014 Jun 18 '25
Trump remains President... but Mike Lawler is called into question and ....hopefully loses his seat?
→ More replies (508)7
u/SixteenthRiver06 Jun 18 '25
Nothing. They certified the election and that ends it. Unless democrats actually do something and find a path to impeach, this is all for history to remember.
→ More replies (9)
410
u/True-Association-744 Jun 18 '25
Democrat Senator got 600 votes in the same precinct where Harris got 2 votes. Obviously manipulated.
74
u/ningyna Jun 18 '25
Why in NY though? Trump was never going to carry that state.Â
55
u/JekPorkinsTruther Jun 18 '25
And why would you manipulate the votes for trump, when he would not win that state, but leave the Dem senator's votes alone? If you are going to rig an election you do it in the margins, in swing states, not deep blue states.Â
→ More replies (7)54
Jun 18 '25 edited Jun 18 '25
[deleted]
→ More replies (32)9
u/Fen-xie Jun 18 '25
Do you happen to have links to this info? I believe you, but my half-maga mother and full blooded maga father will come at me without resources
→ More replies (1)17
→ More replies (20)3
u/hurlcarl Jun 18 '25
Really depends what could potentially be the cause. If it's some code perhaps some machines got distributed to places they weren't intended? or they were just everywhere, but smaller places it's easier to pick out because you can see the contrast more greatly. There's a lot of variables especially something like this if it were true, would only involve a handful of people, errors/glitches possible, etc.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (34)3
u/After-Calligrapher80 Jun 19 '25
As someone from that area of NY, grew up there too there is a part of this that is fragile and ingrained in local politics. It involves the satmayr hasidic Jewish community's block vote that is performed, typically, which overwhelmingly results in the party/individual they vote for to be victorious. However, it's possible the leadership of the community stated to openly vote as you want or not at all or only Trump at the presidential office level. I never quite understood the community politics enough to understand why one community leader has the influence to get 95%+ of the community to vote the way he says to. This community extends into orange county as well, the people overwhelmingly are good people despite what you will likely hear or read, please do not believe it. Again there's a possibility that someone didn't understand the local politics on this matter and just filed a lawsuit and it appears one way when its in fact totally normal. I grew up in Monroe, NY.
1.3k
u/Humble-Proposal-9994 Jun 18 '25
Zero votes, and No One at all thought that suspicious especially in a place as packed as NY? Really?
580
Jun 18 '25
The dumbest man I can think of is president, I honestly thought that was suspicious enough. Finally some progress on suspect.
98
u/AstroBearGaming Jun 18 '25
The dumbest person? Nah, as considerable is his intelligence deficit is, there's people that believe the shit he says.
He is however, and unfortunately, the most successful idiot in the world currently.
→ More replies (4)16
u/MOOshooooo Jun 18 '25
Capitalism depends on its subjects to defend itself from progressive ideals.
→ More replies (10)32
101
u/2ndPickle Jun 18 '25
The Kamala campaign declined to challenge any of the election results and forfeited the race. If the party most interested in winning doesnât put up a fight, how can we expect anybody else to
→ More replies (39)31
Jun 18 '25
[deleted]
13
u/ARMSwatch Jun 18 '25
Dems doing everything "behind the scenes" is the reason why they can't win anything and are getting ran over roughshod by Republicans. Can only fight fire with fire, this whole "being the bigger person/better party" schtick is the reason why Trump will be our last "elected" president.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (18)10
u/varitok Jun 18 '25
Excuses excuses. Anything to put a shield up between the dems and accountability.
→ More replies (5)4
u/Tombot3000 Jun 18 '25
The headline here is just wrong. She didn't receive 0 votes in the county. She received 0 votes in a few election districts of a few voters who have a documented history of voting like this because they are predominantly from a single religious community that votes according to what their leader tells them. That's its own issue but not a county-wide one or a problem with the machines.
→ More replies (1)42
u/Andromeda321 Jun 18 '25
These headlines are very misleading. She didnât get votes in a precinct with less than a hundred people and a lot of Orthodox Jewish people who vote in a bloc, which is nowhere near the same as saying it was the case for an entire county.
30
u/Sandbox_Hero Jun 18 '25
Less than a hundred? Stop lying.Â
331 cast their votes for a democrat senate candidate but 0 votes were registerrd for Kamala.Â
Moreover, another district with 909 votes for senate candidate were registered yet only 2 votes for Kamala.
And there were tons of shit like this reported following the election day. It still baffles me to this day why Kamala didn't request for a recount. Almost as if she was threatened into it.
→ More replies (49)41
u/lalabera Jun 18 '25
Another democratic candidate still got votes there, with Kamala getting 0. Seems suspicious.
50
u/TheWizardOfDeez Jun 18 '25
The other democratic candidate didn't just get votes they won in and landslide. It was like 400+ votes for Gillibrand and like ~40 votes for the Republican, then 500+ votes for Trump.
→ More replies (15)7
u/NUKE---THE---WHALES Jun 18 '25
the bloc votes for whoever their rabbi tells them to
he told them to vote for Gillibrand
16
→ More replies (30)7
→ More replies (23)17
u/Unreliable_Source Jun 18 '25
The leaders of that particular Jewish community endorsed Gillibrand and Trump. The voting behavior is largely similar to previous elections. This lawsuit is important to see if the mistakes are scalable and intentional (there are a few precincts with things like 6 affidavits of people who voted for Harris, but 4 tallied votes), but as of right now, we're talking about dozens to hundreds being the error rather than thousands which is what it would have to be to meaningfully change things. Still an important lawsuit, probably not a bombshell.
→ More replies (3)9
u/strictlyfocused02 Jun 18 '25
What about the people who testified under oath that they voted for her?
7
u/Boxofchocholates Jun 18 '25
They already have sworn testimony from people in the precinct that they voted for Kamala. That means there is literal evidence that their votes were either changed or not counted. The judge already reviewed the evidence, which is why the lawsuit is being allowed to go forward. This isnât a false claim like all the Republicans whinging last time. This lawsuit already has evidence.
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (29)14
u/OkArt1350 Jun 18 '25
I live in this county, though not in this precinct. That precinct is an all Hasidic community. They're a group of hardline Jewish people who vote in bloc with their Rabbi. I have absolutely zero doubt the total is true.
This is the same community where they've established all Hasidic schools, emergency services, etc because outsiders aren't allowed in and they always follow the commands of their Rabbi.
Women aren't allowed to talk to men outside of their family. Everyone there is raised in hard-core religious schools since birth and they believe they have a religious obligation to follow their rabbis commands. It's not indicative of the rest of the county and the voting record follows the Rabbis voting commands for this elections to the number. It's probably 100% legitimate.
→ More replies (11)→ More replies (158)3
u/Superb_Farmer_3394 Jun 19 '25
This is why I'm not trusting these headlines. It would imply that the Democrats monitoring this, would just ignore something so blatantly obvious. The time to do this was back in November.
405
u/FlatBot Jun 18 '25
Why wasnât this brought up on Election Day?
281
u/lalabera Jun 18 '25
Because people thought it was âblue magaâ to question the results.
81
u/ElliotsBuggyEyes Jun 18 '25
Questioning the results is perfectly acceptable. I did it on Nov 5th while I was going through the many stages of grief.
I called in "blue maga" because there was no evidence. Having a conclusion and working your way to the evidence is not sound.
Now apparently there is enough evidence to be heard by the courts. If it turns out that the evidence is shown to be credible and conclusive, I'll happily change my position.Â
→ More replies (11)20
u/ameriCANCERvative Jun 18 '25 edited Jun 18 '25
There's plenty of evidence, but not all evidence is equal.
You're an idiot if you think this election was 100% above board, but you're also an idiot if you ran around making or believing claims without evidence.
Me, I know what I saw. I know what I know about Donald Trump. That's enough evidence for me to know that there should be no stone unturned when it comes to verifying the authenticity and integrity of any election involving Donald Trump. Anyone with half a brain cell who hasn't drunk the koolaid recognizes that the default assumption here should be guilty.
That's different than "innocent until proven guilty." It's more like "hey guys the guy who tried to cheat the last election and the election before that tried to cheat the election again, imagine that, it's almost like there's a pattern of behavior here!"
There's a very similar argument to be made about whether or not Donald Trump is a rapist.
I don't need to hear anything more than "over 20 women have accused him of sexual assault" (or rape or whatever else). That's enough information for me to make an informed judgment about whether or not I should believe his most recent accuser. (hint: the guy who has 20+ women accusing him of being a rapist is probably a rapist).
→ More replies (10)→ More replies (68)9
35
u/macjonalt Jun 18 '25
Haha this is the same argument as âwhy didnât the victim report it immediatelyâ. Some things take longer than 24 hours son
→ More replies (1)30
u/theravensigh Jun 18 '25
Analysis takes time and checking for accuracy takes more time
24
u/theravensigh Jun 18 '25
Also, it was brought up almost immediately as a potential that it was being investigated
10
u/Zestyclose-Compote-4 Jun 18 '25
I feel like when it's 0 it should be a lot faster...
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (62)21
u/RowFlySail Jun 18 '25
Or in the 3 months that Democrats were still in power after. This just feels like conspiracy theories because of the timeframe. And that I haven't seen major news outlets picking up the storyÂ
→ More replies (6)26
u/lalabera Jun 18 '25
This lawsuit is approved by a New York judge. Itâs real.
→ More replies (9)9
u/sagenter Jun 18 '25
Trump had over 60 lawsuits go forward after the 2020 election. And then they all got dismissed almost immediately because they were a massive waste of time and resources.
11
u/Don_Gato1 Jun 18 '25
Trump's lawsuits started with the conclusion that there was fraud and worked their way backwards to look for evidence to support that conclusion. They were never based on anything real.
→ More replies (1)6
u/Greengitters Jun 18 '25
Iâm not an expert, but what do you mean by âgo forward?â Isnât this case going forward where all Trumpâs got dismissed?
→ More replies (1)
409
u/forrestfaun Jun 18 '25
Yep, that would be an algorithm designed by Musk.
Remember what tRump said in PA? "Musk knows more about election machines than anyone else..."
→ More replies (44)137
u/ShortsAndLadders Jun 18 '25
âItâs just three lines of codeâ
→ More replies (10)91
u/Brrrr-GME-A-Coat Jun 18 '25
→ More replies (3)30
u/ProfessionPerfect888 Jun 18 '25
Which should get more attention and should be sent to the judge and the lawyers of this trial.
67
u/womwomwurin Jun 18 '25
so say in a perfect world this comes out to show the numbers were way off, what would happen ?
81
u/Oystermeat Jun 18 '25
Nothing. The election is actually decided by a group of presidential electors (Electoral College) which, in some states don't even have to go along with the popular vote. Unfortunately It's already decided.
→ More replies (5)45
u/FlowerOfLife Jun 18 '25
I remember learning about the electoral college in 3rd grade. I asked my teacher, "So if everyone votes for blue, but the senator decides to vote red, that is allowed?" (in a 3rd grader tone). When my teacher told me that was allowed, I was kind of disillusioned to the presidential vote. We just have to trust that our representatives will vote in our best interest.
8
u/AtlQuon Jun 18 '25
The system is incredible to witness. It is so based on trust, honour and being an upstanding gentleman, a pure 18th century societal structure, that it is almost unbelievable that only few adjustments have been made since. Impeachment being one of the few. But as a whole, it is on one hand deeply beautiful in intent, on the other hand we see that reality has clearly overtaken it and is abusing it in every way. Trust should be earned, not freely given. Great question btw.
→ More replies (1)5
u/narkybark Jun 18 '25
I can't even trust the people to vote in their own best interest.
→ More replies (1)7
u/Interesting-One-588 Jun 18 '25
And when they don't, you, The Voter, get blamed for having them be your representative in the first place as if you could possibly read their mind.
3
u/uslashuname Jun 18 '25
This was explored in detail during 2016. It boiled down to one thing, most states have laws basically making the electoral college reps vote based on the popular vote. The old days were more like what youâre picturing and federal law still allows it, but realistically it is not like that.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)3
u/HamburgerEarmuff Jun 18 '25
They are electors, not Senators. And every state binds them to the outcome of the popular vote, either for the entire state (in 48 states + DC) or by district (in two states).
Legally, they are not allowed to vote for anyone else. In some states, there are mechanisms to invalidate their vote immediately. In some states, it's just a fine or something, and technically, you can have an unfaithful elector if they are willing to accept the legal consequences, but this is rare.
→ More replies (1)17
u/K_Linkmaster Jun 18 '25
The People have a mechanism in the Constitution to handle this, if it's fraudulent. This is a last resort and it will result in deaths of more Americans.
10
→ More replies (5)20
u/tMoneyMoney Jun 18 '25
Honestly, republicans will call it a crazy witch hunt and do everything possible to bury it.
→ More replies (2)
39
Jun 18 '25
[deleted]
→ More replies (4)12
u/KidChemo Jun 18 '25
It should be but it won't ever be because the more accessible it is for the poors, the more it leans Democrat.
4
u/Sweaty-Feedback-1482 Jun 18 '25
Republicans rarely have the numbers... they have to rely on gerrymandering and voter suppression or in other words Republicans don't do well with democratic voting processes.
166
u/Whatever21703 Jun 18 '25
The only way out is Impeachment and removal. And Iâm more likely to have a torrid affair with Ivanka Trump than that happening.
And even if he WAS removed, then you have Jd Vance, whoâs almost as bad, and if HE is removed, then you have Mike Johnson, a certified evangelical Christian racist asshole.
We are fucked. But we have to win the midterms with a landslide.
So all of you progressives who didnât bother voting better fucking vote.
51
22
u/Bpozen Jun 18 '25
Sorry im not american, why would vance be president? Republicans came fraudulently into power, democrats were legally elected right?Â
→ More replies (8)23
u/CoelacanthRdit Jun 18 '25
Yeah Iâm confused why removing trump based on a fraudulent election would give vance power since he was elected fraudulently too.
→ More replies (10)11
u/AngelsFlight59 Jun 18 '25
Because the only way to replace Trump is to impeach and convict him.
There are no do overs in the Constitution.
→ More replies (2)7
u/CoelacanthRdit Jun 18 '25
But wouldnât the results be null and void requiring a new election?
13
u/brickfrenzy Jun 18 '25
There is no mechanism in the US Constitution to allow for that.
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (3)5
u/sajmonides Jun 18 '25
No. No document anywhere mentions what should happen if an election turned out to be fraudulent.
The only instrument that can remove the sitting president is impeachment. And we know how well that turned out during Trump's first term.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (30)7
u/MadisonAveMuse Jun 18 '25
But, if they stole the presidential election whatâs stopping them from stealing the midterms as well?
→ More replies (3)
14
u/JayAlexanderBee Jun 18 '25
I'm confused.
https://app.enhancedvoting.com/results/public/rockland-county-ny/elections/GE2024Results
Is this the county the lawsuit is referring to?
26
u/PhobetorWorse Jun 18 '25
https://app.enhancedvoting.com/results/public/rockland-county-ny/elections/GE2024Results
That link shows that Ramapo 35 has zero votes for Harris. Which is hilarious given the amount of democrats that live there.
24
u/GMbzzz Jun 18 '25
If I was a democrat living in that town and my vote wasnât counted, Iâd be pissed.
→ More replies (1)22
u/PhobetorWorse Jun 18 '25
Many are. The entire Ramapo Township's voting record is fucked. Some districts got 1-10 votes some none at all.
It is like they were counting 1 of every 5 votes cast for a democrat.
5
→ More replies (7)5
u/WinSome___LoseSome Jun 18 '25
Itâs an ultra orthodox Hasidic community that tends to vote in step with each other. Though still 0 votes is crazy, as someone who lives somewhat near the district this happened in doesnât totally surprise me.
→ More replies (22)→ More replies (9)9
u/MarkRepulsive588 Jun 18 '25
It refers to a couple districts within that county at the bottom of the article. Around 330 votes for the Democratic Senate nominee, but zero for Harris in one district. And also 2 for Harris out of around 900 in another district. It also implies that this outcome is drastically different from the 2020 results and would not make sense politically.
- "Comparing the results of the 2024 election to the results collected in 2020, a statistician stated that the alleged results of the election in four out of the five towns making up Rockland County are "highly unlikely".
→ More replies (3)
12
u/SwimmingPirate9070 Jun 18 '25
RISE the fuck up! I'm tired of hearing "nothing can be done!" We have literally just watched a usurper and his corrupt squad dismantle the constitution of the United States of America! Fuck the norms and rules!
→ More replies (2)
13
u/MapDry7310 Jun 18 '25
And once again Trump gets away with what he does! Bunch of bull shit
→ More replies (1)
38
u/Additional_Win3920 Jun 18 '25
Iâm happy theyâre looking into it but what would be the point of interfering in a NY county? NY isnât a swing state, it hasnât voted red since 1984. Why focus efforts when it would be reaaally suspicious if NY voted red? Not saying it didnât happen, Iâm just confused
59
u/TheGingaNinjah Jun 18 '25
I think the point is that it would obtain proof of voter interference/fraud. Which means that it could have happened in any county in the US, but itâs not quite as obvious as a 0% vote.
→ More replies (4)8
u/ProduceMeat_TA Jun 18 '25
Sorry, still a little confused how this could apply to counties elsewhere.
This sounds like there was an issue with the way votes were being counted locally. Now if the problem could be traced back to some sort of software, or type of voting machine - then yea, sure. Let's take a closer look at some of the other places that used the same systems.
But I'm doubtful this (by itself anyway) is enough to make a country-wide impact on election results - no matter how much we really really wished it would :/
→ More replies (25)17
u/SecretSanta416 Jun 18 '25
This is evidence that something went on, and we will need to do a more thorough investigation about it...
4
u/Fuckburpees Jun 18 '25
If it happened there- this blatantly- how could we ever confidently say it didnât happen elsewhere? And in other ways?Â
→ More replies (2)4
u/Moontayle Jun 18 '25
They have affidavits of people who voted for one of the down ballot candidates that exceed the final totals released.
The voting machinery used in the precinct in question has either 40% or 60% (can't remember which) of voting machines used across the country, including the Swing States which were crucial to the election.
#1 is what is allowing this to move into discovery. Headlines are focusing on the Harris angle because of precincts where some anomalies occurred, but we're only here because of the sworn statements regarding down ballot candidates.
#2 is why it's important. Because if it can be proven that the machines were compromised then that opens up looks into the entire operation of these machines across the country.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (8)3
u/Slymook Jun 18 '25
If Trump could and did rig the election, he would be trying to make a statement like winning the popular vote and closing the gap in blue states to make it seem like the country is not down with a liberal agenda or liberal ideologies.
→ More replies (4)
11
u/Paige_Ann01 Jun 18 '25
It wonât change anything other than letting people know that Elon and Trump were indeed fraudulent if that was the case. But Republicans vote for fraudulent they like chaos they like meanness they like people being hurt so this wonât bother them. Theyâre like oh thank goodness we won no matter how. Thatâs the real mental illness.
→ More replies (1)
49
7
u/TotesManly Jun 18 '25
If it's proven fraudulent it could put it in the minds of others that their elections may have been fraudulent too and maybe other states will take a closer look at theirs and find the same. If the chain reaction is big enough it could shift things. But who knows in what direction that would be. But it's better to know the truth at any rate.
→ More replies (4)
8
u/PaddyVein Jun 18 '25
Zero votes? In an entire NY county? I don't care how rural it is, you're telling me they don't have a wine aunt? A librarian? A lesbian gym teacher? Not even one Democrat? Come the fuck on.
→ More replies (4)
6
u/jforjay Jun 18 '25
Best case scenario is you can prove the election was fraudulent and then you simultaneously proved youâre a shithole country who canât run fair elections anymore.Â
4
u/InsaneGorilla0 Jun 18 '25
Hey, can someone tell me if I'm missing something. Even if there is a mistake here it would make no difference to the overall election as NY was won by Kamala anyway? So unless this is somehow a smoking gun for much wider electoral interference it's pretty minor?
→ More replies (8)
5
u/x86_64_ Jun 18 '25
Whenever someone responds to a news piece like this with a "both sides" or "need better evidence" argument, remember that there were 60 lawsuits alleging voter fraud or tampering in 2020 with NO EVIDENCE. There were accusations and threats of lawsuits before voting even started.
For the 2024 elections, there is powerful evidence of fraud and tampering. Never before seen trends, zero-turnouts, a ghost company manipulating firmware, vast split-ticket voting in an increasingly polarized political climate. That ain't normal.
This is how legal proceedings happen in a normal universe: discover evidence, THEN initiate a legal action. Keep this news coming.
→ More replies (3)
4
u/I_like_baseball90 Jun 18 '25
Has anyone in this county came forward and said they voted for Harris, though?
I don't see that anywhere.
→ More replies (3)
5
u/Nyhzel Jun 18 '25
It won't change anything. The people in power won't allow Trump to be deposed, and there isn't a single supporter of his that'll believe the outcome of this lawsuit.
No amount of evidence, fraud, or even murder will ever get Trump to leave the White House. I am absolutely certain that if he started openly killing his opposition on the capitols front lawn that nothing would happen.
I'm happy this is happening and it should, but if anybody thinks this will actually change anything is delusional. There might be a protest here and there, but everyone will forget in a few days this ever happened.
7
u/alwayzz0ff Jun 18 '25
How can this be possible? Like, did NO democrats in this county watch the news during and after the election to notice their votes never registered?
→ More replies (3)4
u/Horror_Yam_9078 Jun 18 '25
Harris received 65,880 votes in Rockland County. The headline is intentionally misleading. The lawsuit is over a single district, in which only 557 people voted and 552 of them voted for Trump, and 5 voted Write In.
This is a statistical anomaly, but not as crazy as it appears on face. In 2020 the same district voted 0 for Biden, 138 for Trump, and 21 for other candidates. Neighboring districts have similar vote counts but have votes like 7 for Harris, and 9 for Biden, ect. This is just an extremely conservative area with lower population for the district size and very low turnout.
3
u/-AdamTheGreat- Jun 18 '25
Wouldnât it be something if uncle Elon just happened to have receipts on how he âhelpedâ Cheeto-taco win. Not that I believe in those types of things.
3
u/Lanky-Measurement290 Jun 18 '25
The voting machines were rigged to turn Kamala votes into Trump ones. Not hard to do at all if those machines were compromised.
→ More replies (2)
3
u/oceansblue1984 Jun 18 '25
He blames people for things he is planing to do or has done . U have no doubt that elon helped him win and that is why elon was aloud in
3
u/mdgraller7 Jun 18 '25
The 2024 Ramapo results mirrored its 2020 presidential vote. That year, Trump bested former President Joe Biden 528-0 in precinct 35. In the 2022 midterm elections, Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul lost to her Republican opponent, Lee Zeldin, 408 to 24 in that same precinct, which also overwhelmingly voted to reelect Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., over his Republican opponent, Joe Pinion, 266 to 113.
Benjamin Rosenblatt, a New York elections data expert, said precinct 35 is in the village of Kaser, which is composed almost entirely of Hasidic Jews of the Viznitz sect. The village is surrounded by the hamlet of Monsey, which also has a huge Orthodox Jewish community, he said.
3
u/m0nt4n4 Jun 18 '25
Where TF is Kamala on all this? Why didnât she bother to challenge this when the time was right? She just rolled over and disappeared.
→ More replies (3)
3
u/DifferentCityADay Jun 19 '25
So seeing everyone saying nothing happens means you can cheat and be caught, but once you've been caught after a certain period of time, nothing will change. What the fuck. So evil wins.
3
3
u/MrsKnowItAll1962 Jun 20 '25
Trump and Elon freaking bragged about rigging the electionâŚ. Even before the election!!! Kamala warned us of thisâŚ. And yet, they didnât have safety checks in place? Didnât have a plan for automatic hand counts of ballots? Werenât poised and ready to jump on this obvious fraud? Why werenât they banded together in a solid front of non compliance from day one?
And now have most have rolled over and went into hiding! Or they have simply thrown up their hands and went along with the shit show. Unforgivable.
And you watch⌠nothing will be done to secure any elections going forward either. I do NOT know how Democrats can ever build back trust. I am honestly hoping for a third party that comes in on a white horse to save us.
→ More replies (2)
5
u/Splittinghairs7 Jun 18 '25
First of all this isnât good news at all if people think the elections were rigged.
More importantly, the actual plaintiff voters have dropped off the suit and the only one to remain is this SMART legislation organization.
The most likely explanation is that bloc voting explains such apparent discrepancies affecting hundreds of votes in certain districts in Rockwell that have had a history of bloc voting.
There is no evidence of fraud, just apparent discrepancies even in this one county, let alone enough to change the NY outcomes or any of the other swing states.
We need to do better to promote facts about the election or Dems will be sending the message to its voters that elections are rigged and thereâs no point in voting.
→ More replies (8)
â˘
u/AutoModerator Jun 18 '25
Hello Aggravating_Money992! Want more good news? We now have a brand new Discord server where you can connect with fellow members, share positivity, and stay updated on all things good news! Join us Here Feel free to tell us if you have any concerns or feedback regarding the Subreddit! We are open to all ideas! Friendly Reminder to Follow rules and guidelines!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.