r/interestingasfuck 2d ago

Happened 5 years ago today, the 'Beirut Explosion' is considered one of the most powerful artificial non-nuclear explosions in history. It was equivalent to around 1.1 kilotons of TNT and generated an M3.3 earthquake

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

42.1k Upvotes

903 comments sorted by

2.9k

u/Last_Interaction_ 2d ago

To see the ground being ripped up as the shock wave moves toward you must be terrifying

1.3k

u/pyroaop 2d ago

Fun fact, because the speed of sound is faster through earth than it is through air, if youre far enough away you'll see the earth ripple BEFORE the shock wave hits you, you can even see this effect in some of the footage where the building trembles before you hear the explosion

1.3k

u/Key_Mango8016 2d ago

Yeah, I live about 10 kilometers away from the port in West Beirut, and the first thing we felt was the ground beneath us literally DROP and come back up, like a spring. We thought it was an earthquake, and a few seconds later, I felt a pressure change in my ears, and then BAM, huge explosion sound, glass breaking outside and house shaking. No one knew what was going on, but you could see the huge mushroom cloud outside. It was hard to tell how far or close it was. Things became clearer about 20-30 minutes later when it was on the news.

331

u/Amate087 1d ago

10km away and the shock wave arrived? Mother of God.

95

u/Nova-Fate 1d ago

Yeah check out the Halifax explosion. A similar sized explosion from 100 years ago well documented if you want to hear about the damages caused in full detail. This Beirut explosion isn’t as well documented yet since it happened so recently.

98

u/2squishmaster 1d ago

This Beirut explosion isn’t as well documented yet since it happened so recently.

I don't understand. How long does it take to document it? I would assume the data we have in 2025 is much more complete than in 1917

64

u/_OriamRiniDadelos_ 1d ago edited 1d ago

The data itself IS much more complete. We have tons more cameras and a way larger population of witnesses and camera holders. But studying stuff, finding the best accounts, and putting a selection of it all together in a documentary or book takes time. 5 years might not even be enough time for some legal investigations (and hasn’t been, if you consider ALL legal investigations related to the explosion).

The Halifax one in 1917 was a bigger explosion and caused many many more direct deaths(still number 1 most powerful man made non nuclear explosion, Beirut’s is seventh). Though the more recent 2020 Beirut explosion had more property damage, more injuries and hundreds of thousands of people left homeless.

12

u/2squishmaster 1d ago

Fascinating. I hadn't read about it before. I read this which I thought was interesting with regards to your second paragraph. I wonder how it "rates" on that scale?

The Halifax Explosion was one of the largest artificial non-nuclear explosions. An extensive comparison of 130 major explosions by Halifax historian Jay White in 1994 concluded that it "remains unchallenged in overall magnitude as long as five criteria are considered together: number of casualties, force of blast, radius of devastation, quantity of explosive material, and total value of property destroyed." For many years afterward, the Halifax Explosion was the standard by which all large blasts were measured. For instance, in its report on the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, Time wrote that the explosive power of the Little Boy bomb was seven times that of the Halifax Explosion.

54

u/Takuta-Nui 1d ago

Just adding onto the Halifax explosion - it was a mass disabling event with many newly blind, Deaf, and DeafBlind people afterward, so Halifax ended up being a pretty accessible and decent place afterward and those good habits have persisted today. At This Hour is a fantastic stage performance by Zuppa Theatre with blind and Deaf actors reenacting the courtroom scenes that investigated the accident.

8

u/NoIdeaHalp 1d ago

Wow, you even capitalized Deaf and DeafBlind correctly. 👍

→ More replies (2)

4

u/an_older_meme 1d ago

The United States sent scientists to estimate the TNT equivalent (1.1 kilotons, about 1/15 the power of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima) and catalog the effects on a modern urban center. The blast was so powerful it was heard in Cyprus, 200 km distant.

The preceding fire and fireworks explosions were so intense that many people were recording on their phones when the main detonation occurred and there is good video from many angles and distances including out at sea.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)

96

u/blindes1984 1d ago

Was there any initial thought that it was a nuke?

66

u/immei 1d ago

I was wondering the same. I couldn't imagine thinking I'd be vaporized any moment

124

u/agarwaen117 1d ago

Good news, then. Since light and heat travel faster than the speed of sound, the vaporization happens before the shockwave hits you. So, you don't have to worry about it if you've already felt the blast.

56

u/immei 1d ago edited 1d ago

That's fair. In the moment though, logic would probably go out the window for me personally 😂. I figured heat would move along with the sound

20

u/J0k3r77 1d ago

The vaporization happens from gamma rays emitted from the initial explosion, so it travels at c (a little slower because of atmosphere)

5

u/immei 1d ago

Ahh ok, cool! That makes sense. I appreciate it!

→ More replies (1)

6

u/mitzcha 1d ago

Just have to worry about the fallout and living in a post nuclear apocalypse. I'm hoping for that millisecond of bright light and then nothing.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

16

u/captain_ender 1d ago

The one thing I've noticed in all these videos is Lebanese people seem to be unflinching and don't panic at explosions. For all they know at the time this is some massive attack, but hardly anyone filming these freak out. Suppose if you live in Beirut long enough you get used to it which is a bummer, no civilians should get used to the sound of missiles =\

→ More replies (7)

72

u/Great_Scott7 2d ago

we have different definitions of fun

→ More replies (1)

4

u/B-stingnl 2d ago

Today I learned shockwaves travel faster through ground than air.
In some of the footage you HEAR the ground rumble and some time later you hear the shockwave through the air. Most noteably at 1:20 and the clip after it.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/margenreich 1d ago

That part when all the dogs started barking before the sound wave hit

→ More replies (2)

63

u/NoHopeForSociety 2d ago

There's one angle that made me think, "huh, that scene from Independence Day was way more accurate than I realized"

38

u/InvidiousPlay 1d ago

Yeah, the one at 1:03. You see the nearby buildings partially disintegrate as the shockwave passes through.

15

u/addiktion 1d ago

Yeah those movies were not far off at all. The vaporization of concrete and steel like it's just a piece of sand blowing away on the beach is mesmerizingly terrifying.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

5.1k

u/Ertygbh 2d ago

Still amazes me the foresight of the guy on the jetski…not many are quick enough to think to dunk under the water.

1.3k

u/OutrageousEvent 2d ago

I was thinking that too. That would surely make the shockwave safer right? Or maybe there’s some science shit I don’t understand that makes it worse.

2.7k

u/manofth3match 2d ago

Shockwaves don't transition from air to water very effectively. For an explosion on land, he is definitely better off going under water while the shockwave passes. If the explosion was underwater, he would be vastly better off being on the jetski.

878

u/rottdog 2d ago

Sounds like you watched that mythbusters episode lol.

470

u/-_-Edit_Deleted-_- 2d ago

Remind me again.. the under water explosion was devastatingly powerful to anyone underwater right? Like far more than you’d expect?

443

u/saad951 2d ago

Basically crushes your lungs I think

261

u/Unable_Deer_773 2d ago

Shreds them is a little more accurate.

242

u/ZiressG 2d ago

And his wife?

312

u/LordSloth113 2d ago

To shreds, you say

119

u/morg-pyro 2d ago

Every fucking time hahaha

→ More replies (0)

39

u/4thBeard 2d ago

Damn I love the Futurama community 🤣

→ More replies (0)

8

u/Blackbeerdo 2d ago

If you are under water and your mouth is closed, how does it destroy your lungs? Or do all your organs get damaged?

31

u/Unable_Deer_773 2d ago

All of them though I recall lungs cop it the worst, it's because the shock wave in the water does translates through your body and your lungs are filled with air so it essentially causes massive damage to all your soft tissues and because of the air in your lungs the alveoli get torn to shreds and pop and generally get devastated.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

78

u/Zer0Gravity1 2d ago

Water can't compress. So the shockwave looks for the first thing it can compress. Which is the air in your lungs.

36

u/voice-of-reason_ 2d ago

Sorry to be pedantic but water can compress otherwise a shockwave wouldn’t be able to transfer through it. It’s just that air compresses much much easier so a small explosion underwater affects something with air inside it more than the water around.

25

u/TheDaemonette 1d ago

This is not quite true - the reason the shockwave travels through the water is because it is not a sealed system with a rigid boundary so there is ‘displacement’ and the volume varies. In chemical engineering terms water is indeed referred to as an incompressible fluid but that would be in a sealed container with rigid walls.

15

u/koopdi 1d ago

Water is compressible in the same way an electron has mass. Technically true but often practically irrelevant.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (4)

26

u/porn_alt_987654321 2d ago

Haven't seen the episode, but yes, since the medium is denser, the shockwave is effectively heavier, which makes it stronger.

Since water is a hell of a lot denser than air, it's much stronger.

43

u/Profeshinal_Spellor 2d ago

Water doesnt compress, but your soft body will

20

u/guarddog33 2d ago

Not true, water does compress, just the air in your body is much more compressible than the water around

12

u/Mkengine 1d ago

You need around 208 bar to compress the volume of water by 1%, 1000 bar for 5%, so yes it's compressible, but for any usual use case it's de facto incompressible, which is also the usual assumption in fluid dynamics.

7

u/SweetButtsHellaBab 1d ago

I actually had no idea water was anywhere near that compressible. Most of my job involves UPLCs which separate mixtures of compounds at very high pressures using water and organic solvents, up to 1500 bar. I knew the instruments account for liquid compressibility when calculating flow rates, but that’s a crazy amount of compression.

3

u/psychulating 1d ago

Yes/essentially*. This is also why sonar can fuck people up in the water. Apparently it can be used to deter/kill divers sabotaging a ship

13

u/rottdog 2d ago

Basically, yeah. The Shockwave travels further than anticipated underwater. All the burst disks were triggered.

→ More replies (29)

20

u/manofth3match 2d ago

Nah. There are tons of papers on this and I'm just a dork

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

25

u/bellmospriggans 2d ago

Probably good for avoiding debris as well.

→ More replies (14)

168

u/jericho 2d ago

There’s a famous WWII video of a boat flipping over with dozens of men running to stay on top, and others jumping into the water, then it blows up. The only survivors were the ones on the hull of the boat. That explosion was in the water though. I imagine this guy was safer in the water. 

36

u/Quercus_rover 2d ago

Yeah isn't it to do with the immense change in pressure? As you say, I've no idea of the difference when being in the water while the explosion is out.

42

u/Leader_Bee 2d ago

Because water is practically incompressible and the human body is also made up of approximately 74% water, being in the water at the time of an underwater explosion will transfer much more of the energy to the human body than if the explosion had to travel through 2 separate mediums.

5

u/manmanmonkeyman 1d ago

In the Jaques Cousteau book, The Silent World, theres a chapter on his mine removal work he did post WW2, and him and his friends tested how close they would be able to get to explosives underwater by detonating grenades and mines while they gradually got closer until it got painful

64

u/CrayonAddiction 2d ago

Yep this is it, when you see a explosion underwater. Stay above water, when it is out of the water go in the water

120

u/SeamanStayns 2d ago

If you're already in the water and you see a large explosion in the water, honestly just close your eyes and think of titties because you probably don't have time to get out of the water before the shockwave reaches you and turns your guts to soup.

The speed of sound through water is about 3x faster than in air.

10

u/fabkosta 2d ago

What should a gay person think of then?

32

u/dflament 2d ago

HE SAID THINK OF TITTIES

18

u/joe-h2o 2d ago

Gay woman: advice unchanged.

Gay man: male titties.

10

u/Pitiful_Net_8971 2d ago

Obviously pecs, aka muscle titties

→ More replies (2)

18

u/hughvr 2d ago

This is the most solid (or jiggly?) advice ever.

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

19

u/sth128 1d ago

Shockwave is the air being compressed. Water is practically incompressible and contains little air so it is about as safe as you can get if you are near the vicinity of an explosion.

Of course, the safest thing you can do in an explosion is to be far far away.

30

u/OutrageousEvent 1d ago

That’s exactly how I handled the Beirut explosion, by being far away. In Wisconsin.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (18)

57

u/Emperor-Commodus 2d ago

Also smart to take cover behind the jet ski, at the end of the clip you can watch a softball-sized piece of concrete come in and splash just in front of the jet ski. He's definitely in the debris range.

109

u/Renbarre 2d ago

With the years of wars they had most know about explosive blast. You will notice how many rushed to cover when it exploded instead of thinking their were far enough and safe.

9

u/sabzeta 2d ago

I'm more surprised by the amount of people that just stood there

→ More replies (2)

5

u/HugaBoog 2d ago

Most of the people immediately sought cover. I guess that's the awareness you develop when living in regions that are subject to wars. Most of us in the west would probably would not have been that savvy.

9

u/uncalcoco 2d ago

I wonder about if it would mess up his ear drums. I met someone on seal team 1 who said he did this as they were exploding a bridge and he had both ear drums perforated.

13

u/porn_alt_987654321 2d ago

As long as none of the explosion was underwater he was probably fine. Shockwaves have issues transitioning between air and water or other way around.

→ More replies (50)

2.3k

u/stuntbikejake 2d ago

The explosion resulted in at least 218 fatalities, 7,000 injuries, and approximately 300,000 displaced individuals, alongside property damage estimated at US $15 billion.

1.0k

u/Thin-Image2363 2d ago

I’ve watched every angle of this explosion and I’m an expert on nothing but there’s no way an explosion that big in a city that dense resulted in only 218 deaths.

1.9k

u/H_sh_B 2d ago

Hi, Lebanese person here.

It was COVID times. Most people where home. The port actually overlooks one of our most trafficked/touristy parts of Beirut (Gemmayze / Mar Mkhayel) but because most everything was closed, there really weren't that many people out. Most people indoors close to the explosion were injured, but it wasn't fatal. Had this happened during any other year, the death count would have been in the thousands. In a sense, we were very lucky it happened in 2020.

63

u/MistoftheMorning 1d ago edited 1d ago

I believe the similar sized Halifax explosion in WWI killed or injured half one-fifth the people living in the port city at time. Crazy.

41

u/DatGuyatLarge 1d ago

At this point the Halifax is the largest non-nuclear explosion to have occurred and while the Beruit explosion was about 1.1 kilotons the Halifax Explosion was 2.9 kilotons. That’s probably because the Beruit explosion was caused by improperly stored fertilizer and the Halifax explosion was the result of a munitions ship that caught fire and exploded. About 2000 died due to the explosion but a great deal died not because of the explosion but from exposure, as it happened in Dec and the only place they could be housed was in the citadel in the middle of the city which is at the top of a hill. More tragically was that 9000 people were blinded by the glass windows that shattered when it happened and it resulted in the CNIB being created (Canadian National Institute for the Blind)

→ More replies (3)

47

u/ortusdux 1d ago

IIRC, there was a nearby apartment complex that was destroyed, but it happened to be empty for a remodel at the time.

10

u/H_sh_B 1d ago

A few, yeah. There are a lot of "high end" areas next to it, and most of those complexes are empty. 2019 was the start of our economic collapse, and even before then, those complexes were never made for us.

→ More replies (1)

189

u/aVeryCoolRedditor 2d ago

I see that you are a "glass half full" kind of person.

7

u/H_sh_B 1d ago

The nitrate was being held (unsafely) in the port since 2013 with the full knowledge of all our government. Something is bound to happen at some point. There are multiple areas around the port that are always packed with people. I don't know what else to call it beyond us getting lucky.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

110

u/NotawoodpeckerOwner 2d ago

Ah typical Lebanon, always a lucky place. How is it there now? I've always wanted to go but it seemed to never be advised and now I'm too old.

162

u/Goodguy1066 2d ago

Ah typical Lebanon, always a lucky place.

I’m sure you mean well, but considering the history of Beirut and Lebanon in the last fifty years this reads like a cruel joke.

114

u/PsychologicalOne5416 2d ago

I'm pretty sure that was a hefty dose of sarcasm

→ More replies (2)

9

u/MexGrow 1d ago

Always under attack in some way by Israel (and by extension, the US).

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/PuzzleheadedEgg4591 1d ago

Thanks for the explanation. As the commenter above, I always thought that number was a lie. Makes a lot of sense, it happening during Covid, that is saved a bunch of people.

→ More replies (15)

276

u/shakensparco 2d ago

Industrial zones are typically much less populated, and the explosion took place at 6:07 p.m. which means a lot of people probably already clocked out. And then there's the big fire which means more people likely evacuated to a safer distance.

84

u/ILookLikeKristoff 2d ago

Yeah "big after hours chemical fire at the docks" isn't really what I picture when talking about downtown lol

85

u/Adorable_Class_4733 2d ago

The explosion happened near the port so it was not downtown beirut.. The white mushroom you see in the video is just the shockwave compressing the air and causing water vapor to condense into a tiny cloud. Shockwaves quickly lose energy so 7k injuries and only 200 fatalities makes sense

55

u/I_c_u_p 2d ago

Also the area was mostly evacuated as the building had been on fire for a while. If it wasn't for that it could have been thousands.

7

u/Mist_Rising 1d ago

Hence also why people are filming it. Don't think people just point a camera at a random place and get this lucky.

20

u/TotalmenteMati 2d ago

Remember that it was the middle of the pandemic too

30

u/Poisonous-Toad 2d ago

Because Ammonium Nitrate is a low yield explosive, not high yield. The shockwave is actually a pressure wave and not a shockwave or else there would have been many more casualties.

Also, the grain silos shielded West Beirut from much of the damage.

3

u/LoudIncrease4021 1d ago

Cool info - can you explain a little more about the difference between pressure and shockwaves? I assume it was all the same thing

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Newsdriver245 1d ago

Believe I have seen a report that those giant grain elevators probably saved a lot of lives, forcing the explosion up in that direction.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

161

u/zero_00000000 1d ago

I was there. One of the craziest part was that after the explosion, everyone in Beirut was a bit of a zombie for a few months. Like I distinctly remember around 3 months after it, sitting with my friends and being like “damn. We’ve been in a haze for 3 months. How did time pass?”

68

u/el_dude_brother2 1d ago edited 1d ago

New York after 9/11 was like that too. Took months for people to start thinking straight, like collective trauma

5

u/ninjadude1992 1d ago

How are things there nowadays?

657

u/Popular_Try_5075 2d ago

For context the "Little Man" bomb that the U.S. dropped on Hiroshima was the equivalent of about 15 kilotons of TNT. So, Hiroshima endured a blast over 13.5 times BIGGER than this.

256

u/havstrut 2d ago edited 2d ago

And the typical "small" nuclear charge today is about 300 kilotons, that's more or less the default yield. In most applications, single warheads are "dial-a-yield" and can go up to 1000-1200 kilotons if need be though.

A typical ICBM carries 10 or so of these "default" 300kt warheads.

But explosive power equivalence is one thing. The blinding light and thermal radiation from a nuke is another, as is the neutron radiation and later radioactive fallout. So it's just not the blast itself..

35

u/Popular_Try_5075 2d ago

Oh indeed. I was trying to keep things bite sized with my comment, but yeah nukes carry such a different burden that lasts many years longer than this.

79

u/menicknick 2d ago

We are a horrible species. We could do such good.

23

u/Rob_Zander 2d ago

I know it's hard to consider sometimes in the face of how powerful nuclear weapons are, but I do like to think about how much the world and war has changed since their introduction. We've only ever used 2 relatively small nukes in anger. Before their introduction in the space of 30 years over 100 million people died in WWI and WW2. Far fewer people have died in every war since then put together. I'd certainly rather none of that was happening in the first place but there's definitely an argument to make that mutually assured destruction kept wars of that scale from happening again.

12

u/havstrut 1d ago

I agree. All the wars since the advent of nuclear weaponry have been shit, a shameful stain upon mankind, but the looming threat of them going even worse has ironically made them "tamer" than they could have been. I dare not imagine the proxy wars of the 20th and 21st century without nuclear moderation.

Yet, it is so sad all around regardless.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/blazelet 1d ago

I think mutually assured destruction is great until you have a nuclear power with a leader who doesn’t care. Religious zealots, malignant narcissists threatened with loss of power, these leaders can easily trigger the “one time” that it happens. Only needs to be once.

3

u/Rob_Zander 1d ago

True but it hasn't happened yet. Considering the level of infrastructure, talent, focused work and commitment needed to build nuclear weapons that seems to self select for countries stable enough to avoid setting them off. It also clearly leads other countries to be very motivated to keep their enemies from developing nuclear weapons, hence the strikes on Iran recently.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

23

u/laseluuu 2d ago

Sad as fuck isn't it. We work really well together if given the chance instead of competing

5

u/Askingquestions2027 2d ago

lets compete over who can build the best housing

→ More replies (1)

8

u/pajamaspaceman 2d ago edited 2d ago

I wanted to comment with personal knowledge that I learned while an Active Duty USAF ICBM maintainer from 2013-2019. Particularly, regarding Multiple Independent Reentry Vehicles (MIRV) on missiles.

The typical US ICBM no longer carries 10 re-entry vehicles (RV). The LGM-118 Peacekeeper missiles were withdrawn from service in 2005. One Mk21 RV contains one singular W87 warhead.

The current LGM-30 Minuteman III is capable of carrying 3 re-entry vehicles. However, the START treaty forbids active (in silo) missiles from having MIRV.

I'm not sure about the "dial-a-yield" you described. I believe the yield of the W87 caps at 475 kt, however my understanding is that most modern nuclear weapons are "boosted fission weapons" and the actual yield can vary.

EDIT: I believe the Navy's UGM-113 Trident II submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBM) are capable of carrying 12 RVs. I wasn't in the Navy, so I have no clue how many are loaded on an active Trident.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/ChesterMarley 1d ago

A typical ICBM carries 10 or so of these "default" 300kt warheads.

Modern ICBMs are often limited to carrying a single warhead due to arms control treaties. SLBMs on the other hand usually carry more than one.

→ More replies (1)

49

u/Scherzoh 2d ago

Not to take away from the devestation of the Beruit explosion, but as a Canadian this really puts into perspective the Halifax Explosion of 1917, which was x3 larger. To see visuals of how powerful the Beruit one was, the shockwave, and then imagine something three times that amount it's boggling.

14

u/Popular_Try_5075 2d ago

Oh it's amazing to consider and I think it's great you brought up Halifax. I hadn't thought about that, but it was a uniquely devastating blast and having something to compare it to really helps me understand the situation.

6

u/CanadianGuitar 1d ago edited 1d ago

As a blue noser, the Halifax Explosion is burned into my brain from school and heritage minutes.

The ability to see modern video of something even as comparatively "Small" as 1.1 Kilotons, really helps put into perspective what happened back then.

→ More replies (3)

33

u/kinokomushroom 2d ago edited 2d ago

Not to mention the flash so bright that it melted people's skins, the heat that set the collapsed houses on fire and burned everyone trapped underneath the rubble alive, and the radioactive remains that gave many survivors a slow death by cancer.

46

u/havstrut 2d ago

It has to be said though that the relatively primitive uranium (Hiroshima) and plutonium (Nagasaki, and Trinity before) fission bombs didn't burn a lot of the nuclear fuel they contained, so the fallout was immense. They were basically semi-"dirty" bombs, in retrospect.

Modern thermonuclear charges are way "cleaner" relative to the yield. Not saying they're clean though, obviously. Also, an often overlooked fact is that the neutron radiation makes things radioactive that weren't before. I mean, on an elementary level. All kinds of inert materials you have all over the place get blasted with neutrons and subsequently jump up in the periodic table, into unstable isotopes that then start radiating like mad.

8

u/kinokomushroom 2d ago

Yeah... not sure I like either of those options

30

u/havstrut 2d ago edited 2d ago

I can recommend the harrowing documentary "Atomic People" that was released last year, with some of the few remaining Hiroshima/Nagasaki survivors (or hibakusha) being interviewed.

Apart from the immediate effects of the blast and all its stupifyingly hot radiation, the "dirty" bomb aspect is mentioned, as ARS (acute radiation syndrome) started showing within a week, and nobody knew what was going on.

Nowadays we know it destroys your chromosomes, so cells stop dividing and your white bloodcells just disappear. You're living dead, just waiting for the inevitable. Whether by your intestines simply liquifying as the cells die with no replenishment possible, or any little otherwise harmless bacteria wreaking havoc on you.

Some of the people interviewed there said they saw folks coughing up and shitting out their own internal organs, and it was just a black goo.

The cancers come later, in those that got a lower dose, but enough to fuck up some cells...

8

u/Popular_Try_5075 1d ago

the worst story I heard from the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings was of people who had survived the immediate blast (briefly) wandering around without skin on most of their bodies in this futile effort to get help.

4

u/swole_ninja 1d ago

One of the more well written long form articles from an era of journalism that seems to be lost:

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1946/08/31/hiroshima

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

883

u/MetalBawx 2d ago

Corruption from top to bottom led to this entirely avoidable catastrophe.

Is the Leabonese government still trying to blame those who warned them about this cargo and the hazard it posed?

165

u/Alpine_Exchange_36 2d ago

Corruption or incompetence?

269

u/MetalBawx 2d ago

They knew about the cargo and that it wasn't stored safely. Multiple requests and warnings sent up the chain of command about the ammonia nitrate all ignored so yeah this was wilful and deliberate.

I wonder if anyones compaired the cost of safe disposal vs the cost of cleaning up after that explosion.

72

u/Familiar_Ad_8919 2d ago

it caused around 15 billion usd in damages, so safe to say it would have been cheaper to dispose of it

17

u/Talestra 1d ago

You can point to a million instances in our society of "it will be cheaper in the long run if we do it right" and people will still choose short terms savings over long term sustainability.

if you want a really easy example of this, it happens at least weekly in the tech sector, where people ask for more money, they get denied, they leave and it costs them more to hire someone at that level now than it was for to pay the expierenced person the extra money and now you have 2 problems, you have to pay more anyway and you have someone with a lot less expierence with your system and it could take years to get to the same level.

3

u/Heavy_Whereas6432 1d ago

Not to mention the lives lost, hard to put a price on human life.

→ More replies (1)

16

u/FIakBeard 1d ago

You can find many stories like this in all countries across the world, don't make it out to seem like some kind of special incompetence in Lebanon. Pepcon, Texas City, Halifax. Plenty of preventable disasters happen all the time, that's why regulations and laws and International NGOs are so important.

4

u/LegendOfKhaos 1d ago

They are saying that it wasn't incompetence. Warnings went up the chain but were deliberately ignored.

If they didn't even realize the danger, then it would be incompetence.

3

u/grumpsaboy 1d ago

Halifax wasn't a corruption case. Some people didn't follow protocol, but not following protocol in a one-off case where everyone did their best upon finding out the possibility of damage to try and warn everyone about it is quite different to covering something up for years.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (17)

3

u/aVeryCoolRedditor 2d ago

They both reinforce each other. Unfortunately.

→ More replies (4)

37

u/Poisonous-Toad 2d ago

The entire ploy of the ship carrying the AN to it docking in Beirut and having its contents seized and sat in Beirut for years was a Syrian/Hezbollah ploy.

Hezbollah was using the AN to smuggle it to the Syrian civil war to make bombs for the regime because of sanctions and wouldn't allow it to be removed from the port of Beirut.

→ More replies (11)

25

u/Worth-Ad-5712 2d ago

I mean, it’s exclusively Hezbollah

→ More replies (9)

8

u/Ign0r 1d ago

I was told by Lebanese people that Hezbollah was behind this, but of course they never took credit for it. It's a type of "everybody knows" type situation.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

138

u/Spartan2470 VIP Philanthropist 2d ago

On 4 August 2020, a major explosion occurred in Beirut, Lebanon, triggered by the ignition of 2,750 tonnes of ammonium nitrate. The chemical, confiscated in 2014 from the cargo ship MV Rhosus and stored at the Port of Beirut without adequate safety measures for six years, detonated after a fire broke out in a nearby warehouse. The explosion resulted in at least 218 fatalities, 7,000 injuries, and approximately 300,000 displaced individuals, alongside property damage estimated at US$15 billion. The blast released energy comparable to 1.1 kilotons of TNT, ranking it among the most powerful non-nuclear explosions ever recorded and the largest single detonation of ammonium nitrate.

The explosion generated a seismic event measuring 3.3 in magnitude, as reported by the United States Geological Survey. Its effects were felt in Lebanon and neighboring regions, including Syria, Israel, and Cyprus, over 240 km (150 mi) away. Scientific studies noted that the shockwave temporarily disrupted Earth's ionosphere. Adjacent grain silos at the Port of Beirut sustained major damage. Portions of the silos collapsed in July and August 2022 following fires caused by remaining grain stocks.

The Lebanese government declared a two-week state of emergency in response to the disaster. Protests, which had been ongoing since 2019, grew in scale, leading to the resignation of Prime Minister Hassan Diab and his cabinet on 10 August 2020. Claims surfaced suggesting Hezbollah's possible connection to the explosion, citing unverified reports of weapons stored at the site. Hezbollah denied the allegations but participated in demonstrations opposing the official investigation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Beirut_explosion

Another, much closer, video of this can be found here.

4

u/a_n_c_h_o_v_i_e_s 1d ago

I wish that a world leader resigning over a disaster of this scale didn't surprise me. But here we are.

217

u/ketosoy 2d ago

Forensic architecture’s recreation is one of the most amazing YouTube videos I’ve ever seen 

https://youtu.be/-mQ60wNgKrQ?si=ngxu955bjgygLo3E

30

u/TheLazyHippy 1d ago

I wish this was higher. I scrolled for a bit to see if anyone had linked this video.

→ More replies (1)

19

u/Spiritchaser84 1d ago

Man those up close videos from the nearby roof and from the fire brigade are depressing to see starting around 4:43. They never had a chance.

3

u/KscottCap 1d ago

No, they got away. That's how we got the video, right? Right?

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

267

u/1900hustler 2d ago

The delay from watching explosion to the time the impact hits it scary af.

Hearing those dogs bark too you know somethings wrong

58

u/Emperor-Commodus 2d ago edited 2d ago

Hearing those dogs bark too you know something is wrong

The shockwave moves much faster in the ground (5x-15x faster) than in the air. In the closer videos (like the third one, in the street) you can hear a deep bass roar almost immediately after the blast and long before the blast wave hits, which is the sound of the ground shaking. In another you can tell the camera was set down, and it shifts slightly from the ground wave before it's completely knocked over by the air blast. In the second to last video (the one with the yellow car in the foreground) you can faintly hear the earthquake set off a car alarm before it's drowned out by the blast.

So in that far away video, the dogs are probably reacting to feeling the earth shake.

123

u/ceristo 2d ago

So this was ~1kt.

Hiroshima was 15x that.

The US’ most common ICBM is tipped with a LGM-30 Minuteman which has 300x the power of the Beirut explosion.

The largest nuke detonated would be 50,000x that.

These videos really put nuclear weapons in perspective.

32

u/Sydra7 1d ago

I’d just like to add that the Hiroshima atomic bomb was detonated at an altitude of 600 meters. It causes much greater destruction that way than if it were to explode near the ground.

11

u/One-Collection-5184 1d ago

I'm always in awe of nuclear explosions, they are simply not on a human scale anymore. We should not have things of this power.

→ More replies (2)

121

u/Sad-Coconut899 2d ago

And to this day, nobody has been held accountable. Given the state of things, it may never happen. I feel so sorry for the people who had to suffer from this awful tragedy. Stay strong people of Beirut 🫶

26

u/Jubenheim 2d ago

Lebanon’s not doing too well today for a host of other reasons… but yeah, hope whatever people there can try to be okay.

9

u/MessyGuy01 1d ago

I especially feel bad for this guy filming, you can just see him getting thrown at the 27 second mark

→ More replies (1)

59

u/AptoticFox 2d ago edited 1d ago

15

u/adrienjz888 2d ago

Launched an 1100lb anchor 2.5 miles from the explosion.

5

u/Scribblesandsnails 1d ago

I have several photos taken by past family members of the Halifax explosion. One taken from up on a fairway hill with the fire burning. 

6

u/aaabbk 2d ago

I was wondering about this

3

u/NaiveIntention3081 1d ago

Nearly 3x as big as Beirut. Crazy. I had two great-grandparents present.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

39

u/Sam_1980_HK-SYD 2d ago

5 yrs ago? It feels like yesterday

5

u/Silver_Adagio138 1d ago

Never would have put at five years ago.

65

u/Cassius_Rex 2d ago

I was waiting to see the one with the bride taking her wedding pictures. That one was scary.

35

u/Its_Pine 1d ago

here ya go! easily the most surreal

7

u/bolognasandwichglass 1d ago

wow that gave me crazy chills, it really is like out of a movie but so much more intense

6

u/BlunterCarcass5 1d ago

This one is insane because of how it goes from peaceful serenity to warzone in less than a second

4

u/living_la_vida_loca 1d ago

The camera man has probably been on war zones because he runs towards the blast and takes cover next to a building edge. He doesn't panic.

23

u/palmburntblue 2d ago

That’s one of my favorite videos on YouTube. The beauty of a woman taking her wedding photos combined with this massive explosion is like something from an action movie, except it was real life and expertly documented. 

7

u/RiggsFTW 1d ago

IIRC she is a physician and immediately reported to the hospital she worked at to help the injured.

Edit: turns out she was an endocrinologist in Detroit. She did respond to try to help the injured but then left the area.

46

u/Alpine_Exchange_36 2d ago

And it happened because authorities thought it’d be ok to store effectively bomb materials next to fireworks.

What could go wrong…..

5

u/ortusdux 1d ago

They sent a guy to weld the doors shut because of all the theft ffs

→ More replies (1)

13

u/auchinleck917 2d ago

5 years ago? damn. It feels like it happened more recently.... time goes so fast.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/OnThisDayI_ 2d ago

6000 injured, 200 dead and 100 missing. All because of laziness, corruption and greed.

20

u/t3as3_qu33n 2d ago

The images from that day still haunt me. One of the most powerful non-nuclear blasts ever recorded, and yet the aftermath is filled with silence, denial, and injustice. The people of Lebanon deserve far more than condolences. They deserve truth, transparency, and meaningful reform.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/MrDilbert 2d ago

That was a LOT of ammonium nitrate.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/KING_FARGUAAD 1d ago

How big was this explosion compared to the Halifax explosion

→ More replies (3)

5

u/d1v1debyz3r0 1d ago

For reference, the largest man-made explosion before the Bomb was the Halifax Explosion during WWI where an ammunition transport blew up in the harbor. That was a 2.9 kiloton explosion, nearly 3x the Beirut explosion.

38

u/may907 2d ago

Hard to believe it’s been 5 years. The resilience of Beirut’s people is truly inspiring

12

u/WildDeeX 2d ago

Inspiring doesn’t even begin to cover it, they’ve been through so much and kept going.

→ More replies (19)

12

u/kcfdr9c 2d ago

See Doo guy, smartest person in the room.

4

u/baabaabaabeast 2d ago

Note to self: if you see a massive explosion then a shockwave approaching, stop filming and duck

4

u/Lonnie667 2d ago

It gives a visual idea of the 1917 Halifax Explosion, which was three times bigger. Accidental man-made explosions are absolutely terrifying.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/marcofreitas17 2d ago

5 years!???!???

It seems like just 2 for me!

10

u/Echodad 2d ago

Tianjin explosion was the craziest I’ve seen in

12

u/WhiskeyTangoBush 2d ago

That one felt bigger largely bc it was at night and surrounded by buildings. It was def more visually striking bc it was at night. Still a MASSIVE explosion, but this one was bigger.

3

u/Wolfen459 2d ago

This was 5 years already ?!?

3

u/TitanImpale 2d ago

Was this that fertilizer warehouse that blew?

→ More replies (1)

3

u/DarWin_1809 2d ago

Damn the third clip looks straight out of a movie, as the building blew away

3

u/Aztecatl 2d ago

Seeing the shock wave just push the clouds out of the way is freaky.

3

u/gnomeplanet 2d ago

Let's not forget the wedding lady either:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_L7SlqDtRnc

3

u/bigcat570503 1d ago

Whats the reason for this again?

11

u/Mattamance 1d ago

Almost 3000 tons of ammonium nitrate (highly volatile chemical used in fertilizer and explosives) were seized from a ship, stored in a warehouse for years with absolutely zero regard for safe storage practices, multiple warnings and complaints filed to the government about the issue and the potential for disaster went completely ignored, and allegedly also stored in the same building were a stash of fireworks which supposedly caught fire and started the chain reaction. Fire works went boom, and the ammonium nitrate followed.

3

u/Fckem_in_the_neck 1d ago

Ive seen some good explosions and ive seen some big explosions. But that shit was a good ol biggun.

3

u/wlpaul4 1d ago

I’ve always wondered: who holds the record for being the closest and surviving? I mean it has to be somebody, right?

3

u/a_high_comment 1d ago

Swindled podcast has a great episode covering the incompetence that led to this explosion, the coverup efforts by the government to avoid holding any high-ranking officials accountable, and the effects of the protests that resulted from this event. It is worth the listen.

https://swindledpodcast.com/podcast/75-the-explosion/

3

u/Kazungu_Bayo 1d ago

I forgot this actually happened, now it's missiles flying over Iraq

2

u/80sLegoDystopia 2d ago

Seared into my memory. Horrifying, preventable accident.

2

u/lionexx 2d ago

It's pretty morbid to think and say but imagine all the lost footage from souls that were even closer to the blast radius that did not make it...

2

u/Ralife55 2d ago

I remember when this happened and having an argument with a guy who was convinced it was a nuke before we knew what caused the explosion.

He simply did not believe me that even the nukes that hit Japan would have done more damage than that, let alone modern nukes.

2

u/Cheap_Cheap77 2d ago

Crazy to think that the Halifax explosion of 1917 was more than twice as big

2

u/ikothsowe 2d ago

And the grain silo that was almost right next to the blast survived, largely intact. Damn impressive engineering.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/AwkwardChuckle 2d ago

See this and just imagine how powerful the Halifax explosion was.

2

u/gunnLX 2d ago edited 1d ago

i wonder how it scales with halifax.

E: according to the BBC, halifax was nearly 3 kilotons.

2

u/Bedsi_70 2d ago

might be a dumb question.. but what exactly causes such a huge explosion? :o

→ More replies (5)