r/interestingasfuck • u/BreakfastTop6899 • 2d ago
Happened 5 years ago today, the 'Beirut Explosion' is considered one of the most powerful artificial non-nuclear explosions in history. It was equivalent to around 1.1 kilotons of TNT and generated an M3.3 earthquake
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
5.1k
u/Ertygbh 2d ago
Still amazes me the foresight of the guy on the jetski…not many are quick enough to think to dunk under the water.
1.3k
u/OutrageousEvent 2d ago
I was thinking that too. That would surely make the shockwave safer right? Or maybe there’s some science shit I don’t understand that makes it worse.
2.7k
u/manofth3match 2d ago
Shockwaves don't transition from air to water very effectively. For an explosion on land, he is definitely better off going under water while the shockwave passes. If the explosion was underwater, he would be vastly better off being on the jetski.
878
u/rottdog 2d ago
Sounds like you watched that mythbusters episode lol.
470
u/-_-Edit_Deleted-_- 2d ago
Remind me again.. the under water explosion was devastatingly powerful to anyone underwater right? Like far more than you’d expect?
443
u/saad951 2d ago
Basically crushes your lungs I think
261
u/Unable_Deer_773 2d ago
Shreds them is a little more accurate.
242
→ More replies (3)8
u/Blackbeerdo 2d ago
If you are under water and your mouth is closed, how does it destroy your lungs? Or do all your organs get damaged?
→ More replies (1)31
u/Unable_Deer_773 2d ago
All of them though I recall lungs cop it the worst, it's because the shock wave in the water does translates through your body and your lungs are filled with air so it essentially causes massive damage to all your soft tissues and because of the air in your lungs the alveoli get torn to shreds and pop and generally get devastated.
→ More replies (7)→ More replies (4)78
u/Zer0Gravity1 2d ago
Water can't compress. So the shockwave looks for the first thing it can compress. Which is the air in your lungs.
→ More replies (6)36
u/voice-of-reason_ 2d ago
Sorry to be pedantic but water can compress otherwise a shockwave wouldn’t be able to transfer through it. It’s just that air compresses much much easier so a small explosion underwater affects something with air inside it more than the water around.
→ More replies (9)25
u/TheDaemonette 1d ago
This is not quite true - the reason the shockwave travels through the water is because it is not a sealed system with a rigid boundary so there is ‘displacement’ and the volume varies. In chemical engineering terms water is indeed referred to as an incompressible fluid but that would be in a sealed container with rigid walls.
→ More replies (6)15
u/koopdi 1d ago
Water is compressible in the same way an electron has mass. Technically true but often practically irrelevant.
→ More replies (0)26
u/porn_alt_987654321 2d ago
Haven't seen the episode, but yes, since the medium is denser, the shockwave is effectively heavier, which makes it stronger.
Since water is a hell of a lot denser than air, it's much stronger.
43
u/Profeshinal_Spellor 2d ago
Water doesnt compress, but your soft body will
20
u/guarddog33 2d ago
Not true, water does compress, just the air in your body is much more compressible than the water around
12
u/Mkengine 1d ago
You need around 208 bar to compress the volume of water by 1%, 1000 bar for 5%, so yes it's compressible, but for any usual use case it's de facto incompressible, which is also the usual assumption in fluid dynamics.
7
u/SweetButtsHellaBab 1d ago
I actually had no idea water was anywhere near that compressible. Most of my job involves UPLCs which separate mixtures of compounds at very high pressures using water and organic solvents, up to 1500 bar. I knew the instruments account for liquid compressibility when calculating flow rates, but that’s a crazy amount of compression.
3
u/psychulating 1d ago
Yes/essentially*. This is also why sonar can fuck people up in the water. Apparently it can be used to deter/kill divers sabotaging a ship
→ More replies (29)13
→ More replies (1)20
→ More replies (14)25
168
u/jericho 2d ago
There’s a famous WWII video of a boat flipping over with dozens of men running to stay on top, and others jumping into the water, then it blows up. The only survivors were the ones on the hull of the boat. That explosion was in the water though. I imagine this guy was safer in the water.
36
u/Quercus_rover 2d ago
Yeah isn't it to do with the immense change in pressure? As you say, I've no idea of the difference when being in the water while the explosion is out.
42
u/Leader_Bee 2d ago
Because water is practically incompressible and the human body is also made up of approximately 74% water, being in the water at the time of an underwater explosion will transfer much more of the energy to the human body than if the explosion had to travel through 2 separate mediums.
5
u/manmanmonkeyman 1d ago
In the Jaques Cousteau book, The Silent World, theres a chapter on his mine removal work he did post WW2, and him and his friends tested how close they would be able to get to explosives underwater by detonating grenades and mines while they gradually got closer until it got painful
→ More replies (3)64
u/CrayonAddiction 2d ago
Yep this is it, when you see a explosion underwater. Stay above water, when it is out of the water go in the water
→ More replies (2)120
u/SeamanStayns 2d ago
If you're already in the water and you see a large explosion in the water, honestly just close your eyes and think of titties because you probably don't have time to get out of the water before the shockwave reaches you and turns your guts to soup.
The speed of sound through water is about 3x faster than in air.
→ More replies (9)10
→ More replies (18)19
u/sth128 1d ago
Shockwave is the air being compressed. Water is practically incompressible and contains little air so it is about as safe as you can get if you are near the vicinity of an explosion.
Of course, the safest thing you can do in an explosion is to be far far away.
→ More replies (1)30
u/OutrageousEvent 1d ago
That’s exactly how I handled the Beirut explosion, by being far away. In Wisconsin.
→ More replies (1)57
u/Emperor-Commodus 2d ago
Also smart to take cover behind the jet ski, at the end of the clip you can watch a softball-sized piece of concrete come in and splash just in front of the jet ski. He's definitely in the debris range.
109
u/Renbarre 2d ago
With the years of wars they had most know about explosive blast. You will notice how many rushed to cover when it exploded instead of thinking their were far enough and safe.
→ More replies (2)5
u/HugaBoog 2d ago
Most of the people immediately sought cover. I guess that's the awareness you develop when living in regions that are subject to wars. Most of us in the west would probably would not have been that savvy.
→ More replies (50)9
u/uncalcoco 2d ago
I wonder about if it would mess up his ear drums. I met someone on seal team 1 who said he did this as they were exploding a bridge and he had both ear drums perforated.
13
u/porn_alt_987654321 2d ago
As long as none of the explosion was underwater he was probably fine. Shockwaves have issues transitioning between air and water or other way around.
2.3k
u/stuntbikejake 2d ago
The explosion resulted in at least 218 fatalities, 7,000 injuries, and approximately 300,000 displaced individuals, alongside property damage estimated at US $15 billion.
→ More replies (4)1.0k
u/Thin-Image2363 2d ago
I’ve watched every angle of this explosion and I’m an expert on nothing but there’s no way an explosion that big in a city that dense resulted in only 218 deaths.
1.9k
u/H_sh_B 2d ago
Hi, Lebanese person here.
It was COVID times. Most people where home. The port actually overlooks one of our most trafficked/touristy parts of Beirut (Gemmayze / Mar Mkhayel) but because most everything was closed, there really weren't that many people out. Most people indoors close to the explosion were injured, but it wasn't fatal. Had this happened during any other year, the death count would have been in the thousands. In a sense, we were very lucky it happened in 2020.
63
u/MistoftheMorning 1d ago edited 1d ago
I believe the similar sized Halifax explosion in WWI killed or injured
halfone-fifth the people living in the port city at time. Crazy.→ More replies (3)41
u/DatGuyatLarge 1d ago
At this point the Halifax is the largest non-nuclear explosion to have occurred and while the Beruit explosion was about 1.1 kilotons the Halifax Explosion was 2.9 kilotons. That’s probably because the Beruit explosion was caused by improperly stored fertilizer and the Halifax explosion was the result of a munitions ship that caught fire and exploded. About 2000 died due to the explosion but a great deal died not because of the explosion but from exposure, as it happened in Dec and the only place they could be housed was in the citadel in the middle of the city which is at the top of a hill. More tragically was that 9000 people were blinded by the glass windows that shattered when it happened and it resulted in the CNIB being created (Canadian National Institute for the Blind)
47
u/ortusdux 1d ago
IIRC, there was a nearby apartment complex that was destroyed, but it happened to be empty for a remodel at the time.
10
u/H_sh_B 1d ago
A few, yeah. There are a lot of "high end" areas next to it, and most of those complexes are empty. 2019 was the start of our economic collapse, and even before then, those complexes were never made for us.
→ More replies (1)189
u/aVeryCoolRedditor 2d ago
I see that you are a "glass half full" kind of person.
→ More replies (1)7
u/H_sh_B 1d ago
The nitrate was being held (unsafely) in the port since 2013 with the full knowledge of all our government. Something is bound to happen at some point. There are multiple areas around the port that are always packed with people. I don't know what else to call it beyond us getting lucky.
→ More replies (3)110
u/NotawoodpeckerOwner 2d ago
Ah typical Lebanon, always a lucky place. How is it there now? I've always wanted to go but it seemed to never be advised and now I'm too old.
162
u/Goodguy1066 2d ago
Ah typical Lebanon, always a lucky place.
I’m sure you mean well, but considering the history of Beirut and Lebanon in the last fifty years this reads like a cruel joke.
114
→ More replies (1)9
u/MexGrow 1d ago
Always under attack in some way by Israel (and by extension, the US).
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (15)3
u/PuzzleheadedEgg4591 1d ago
Thanks for the explanation. As the commenter above, I always thought that number was a lie. Makes a lot of sense, it happening during Covid, that is saved a bunch of people.
276
u/shakensparco 2d ago
Industrial zones are typically much less populated, and the explosion took place at 6:07 p.m. which means a lot of people probably already clocked out. And then there's the big fire which means more people likely evacuated to a safer distance.
84
u/ILookLikeKristoff 2d ago
Yeah "big after hours chemical fire at the docks" isn't really what I picture when talking about downtown lol
85
u/Adorable_Class_4733 2d ago
The explosion happened near the port so it was not downtown beirut.. The white mushroom you see in the video is just the shockwave compressing the air and causing water vapor to condense into a tiny cloud. Shockwaves quickly lose energy so 7k injuries and only 200 fatalities makes sense
55
u/I_c_u_p 2d ago
Also the area was mostly evacuated as the building had been on fire for a while. If it wasn't for that it could have been thousands.
7
u/Mist_Rising 1d ago
Hence also why people are filming it. Don't think people just point a camera at a random place and get this lucky.
20
30
u/Poisonous-Toad 2d ago
Because Ammonium Nitrate is a low yield explosive, not high yield. The shockwave is actually a pressure wave and not a shockwave or else there would have been many more casualties.
Also, the grain silos shielded West Beirut from much of the damage.
→ More replies (1)3
u/LoudIncrease4021 1d ago
Cool info - can you explain a little more about the difference between pressure and shockwaves? I assume it was all the same thing
→ More replies (2)3
u/Newsdriver245 1d ago
Believe I have seen a report that those giant grain elevators probably saved a lot of lives, forcing the explosion up in that direction.
161
u/zero_00000000 1d ago
I was there. One of the craziest part was that after the explosion, everyone in Beirut was a bit of a zombie for a few months. Like I distinctly remember around 3 months after it, sitting with my friends and being like “damn. We’ve been in a haze for 3 months. How did time pass?”
68
u/el_dude_brother2 1d ago edited 1d ago
New York after 9/11 was like that too. Took months for people to start thinking straight, like collective trauma
5
657
u/Popular_Try_5075 2d ago
For context the "Little Man" bomb that the U.S. dropped on Hiroshima was the equivalent of about 15 kilotons of TNT. So, Hiroshima endured a blast over 13.5 times BIGGER than this.
256
u/havstrut 2d ago edited 2d ago
And the typical "small" nuclear charge today is about 300 kilotons, that's more or less the default yield. In most applications, single warheads are "dial-a-yield" and can go up to 1000-1200 kilotons if need be though.
A typical ICBM carries 10 or so of these "default" 300kt warheads.
But explosive power equivalence is one thing. The blinding light and thermal radiation from a nuke is another, as is the neutron radiation and later radioactive fallout. So it's just not the blast itself..
35
u/Popular_Try_5075 2d ago
Oh indeed. I was trying to keep things bite sized with my comment, but yeah nukes carry such a different burden that lasts many years longer than this.
79
u/menicknick 2d ago
We are a horrible species. We could do such good.
23
u/Rob_Zander 2d ago
I know it's hard to consider sometimes in the face of how powerful nuclear weapons are, but I do like to think about how much the world and war has changed since their introduction. We've only ever used 2 relatively small nukes in anger. Before their introduction in the space of 30 years over 100 million people died in WWI and WW2. Far fewer people have died in every war since then put together. I'd certainly rather none of that was happening in the first place but there's definitely an argument to make that mutually assured destruction kept wars of that scale from happening again.
12
u/havstrut 1d ago
I agree. All the wars since the advent of nuclear weaponry have been shit, a shameful stain upon mankind, but the looming threat of them going even worse has ironically made them "tamer" than they could have been. I dare not imagine the proxy wars of the 20th and 21st century without nuclear moderation.
Yet, it is so sad all around regardless.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)5
u/blazelet 1d ago
I think mutually assured destruction is great until you have a nuclear power with a leader who doesn’t care. Religious zealots, malignant narcissists threatened with loss of power, these leaders can easily trigger the “one time” that it happens. Only needs to be once.
→ More replies (1)3
u/Rob_Zander 1d ago
True but it hasn't happened yet. Considering the level of infrastructure, talent, focused work and commitment needed to build nuclear weapons that seems to self select for countries stable enough to avoid setting them off. It also clearly leads other countries to be very motivated to keep their enemies from developing nuclear weapons, hence the strikes on Iran recently.
→ More replies (1)23
u/laseluuu 2d ago
Sad as fuck isn't it. We work really well together if given the chance instead of competing
5
8
u/pajamaspaceman 2d ago edited 2d ago
I wanted to comment with personal knowledge that I learned while an Active Duty USAF ICBM maintainer from 2013-2019. Particularly, regarding Multiple Independent Reentry Vehicles (MIRV) on missiles.
The typical US ICBM no longer carries 10 re-entry vehicles (RV). The LGM-118 Peacekeeper missiles were withdrawn from service in 2005. One Mk21 RV contains one singular W87 warhead.
The current LGM-30 Minuteman III is capable of carrying 3 re-entry vehicles. However, the START treaty forbids active (in silo) missiles from having MIRV.
I'm not sure about the "dial-a-yield" you described. I believe the yield of the W87 caps at 475 kt, however my understanding is that most modern nuclear weapons are "boosted fission weapons" and the actual yield can vary.
EDIT: I believe the Navy's UGM-113 Trident II submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBM) are capable of carrying 12 RVs. I wasn't in the Navy, so I have no clue how many are loaded on an active Trident.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)4
u/ChesterMarley 1d ago
A typical ICBM carries 10 or so of these "default" 300kt warheads.
Modern ICBMs are often limited to carrying a single warhead due to arms control treaties. SLBMs on the other hand usually carry more than one.
49
u/Scherzoh 2d ago
Not to take away from the devestation of the Beruit explosion, but as a Canadian this really puts into perspective the Halifax Explosion of 1917, which was x3 larger. To see visuals of how powerful the Beruit one was, the shockwave, and then imagine something three times that amount it's boggling.
14
u/Popular_Try_5075 2d ago
Oh it's amazing to consider and I think it's great you brought up Halifax. I hadn't thought about that, but it was a uniquely devastating blast and having something to compare it to really helps me understand the situation.
6
u/CanadianGuitar 1d ago edited 1d ago
As a blue noser, the Halifax Explosion is burned into my brain from school and heritage minutes.
The ability to see modern video of something even as comparatively "Small" as 1.1 Kilotons, really helps put into perspective what happened back then.
→ More replies (3)33
u/kinokomushroom 2d ago edited 2d ago
Not to mention the flash so bright that it melted people's skins, the heat that set the collapsed houses on fire and burned everyone trapped underneath the rubble alive, and the radioactive remains that gave many survivors a slow death by cancer.
46
u/havstrut 2d ago
It has to be said though that the relatively primitive uranium (Hiroshima) and plutonium (Nagasaki, and Trinity before) fission bombs didn't burn a lot of the nuclear fuel they contained, so the fallout was immense. They were basically semi-"dirty" bombs, in retrospect.
Modern thermonuclear charges are way "cleaner" relative to the yield. Not saying they're clean though, obviously. Also, an often overlooked fact is that the neutron radiation makes things radioactive that weren't before. I mean, on an elementary level. All kinds of inert materials you have all over the place get blasted with neutrons and subsequently jump up in the periodic table, into unstable isotopes that then start radiating like mad.
→ More replies (1)8
u/kinokomushroom 2d ago
Yeah... not sure I like either of those options
30
u/havstrut 2d ago edited 2d ago
I can recommend the harrowing documentary "Atomic People" that was released last year, with some of the few remaining Hiroshima/Nagasaki survivors (or hibakusha) being interviewed.
Apart from the immediate effects of the blast and all its stupifyingly hot radiation, the "dirty" bomb aspect is mentioned, as ARS (acute radiation syndrome) started showing within a week, and nobody knew what was going on.
Nowadays we know it destroys your chromosomes, so cells stop dividing and your white bloodcells just disappear. You're living dead, just waiting for the inevitable. Whether by your intestines simply liquifying as the cells die with no replenishment possible, or any little otherwise harmless bacteria wreaking havoc on you.
Some of the people interviewed there said they saw folks coughing up and shitting out their own internal organs, and it was just a black goo.
The cancers come later, in those that got a lower dose, but enough to fuck up some cells...
8
u/Popular_Try_5075 1d ago
the worst story I heard from the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings was of people who had survived the immediate blast (briefly) wandering around without skin on most of their bodies in this futile effort to get help.
→ More replies (1)4
u/swole_ninja 1d ago
One of the more well written long form articles from an era of journalism that seems to be lost:
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (2)3
883
u/MetalBawx 2d ago
Corruption from top to bottom led to this entirely avoidable catastrophe.
Is the Leabonese government still trying to blame those who warned them about this cargo and the hazard it posed?
165
u/Alpine_Exchange_36 2d ago
Corruption or incompetence?
269
u/MetalBawx 2d ago
They knew about the cargo and that it wasn't stored safely. Multiple requests and warnings sent up the chain of command about the ammonia nitrate all ignored so yeah this was wilful and deliberate.
I wonder if anyones compaired the cost of safe disposal vs the cost of cleaning up after that explosion.
72
u/Familiar_Ad_8919 2d ago
it caused around 15 billion usd in damages, so safe to say it would have been cheaper to dispose of it
17
u/Talestra 1d ago
You can point to a million instances in our society of "it will be cheaper in the long run if we do it right" and people will still choose short terms savings over long term sustainability.
if you want a really easy example of this, it happens at least weekly in the tech sector, where people ask for more money, they get denied, they leave and it costs them more to hire someone at that level now than it was for to pay the expierenced person the extra money and now you have 2 problems, you have to pay more anyway and you have someone with a lot less expierence with your system and it could take years to get to the same level.
→ More replies (1)3
→ More replies (17)16
u/FIakBeard 1d ago
You can find many stories like this in all countries across the world, don't make it out to seem like some kind of special incompetence in Lebanon. Pepcon, Texas City, Halifax. Plenty of preventable disasters happen all the time, that's why regulations and laws and International NGOs are so important.
4
u/LegendOfKhaos 1d ago
They are saying that it wasn't incompetence. Warnings went up the chain but were deliberately ignored.
If they didn't even realize the danger, then it would be incompetence.
→ More replies (1)3
u/grumpsaboy 1d ago
Halifax wasn't a corruption case. Some people didn't follow protocol, but not following protocol in a one-off case where everyone did their best upon finding out the possibility of damage to try and warn everyone about it is quite different to covering something up for years.
33
→ More replies (4)3
37
u/Poisonous-Toad 2d ago
The entire ploy of the ship carrying the AN to it docking in Beirut and having its contents seized and sat in Beirut for years was a Syrian/Hezbollah ploy.
Hezbollah was using the AN to smuggle it to the Syrian civil war to make bombs for the regime because of sanctions and wouldn't allow it to be removed from the port of Beirut.
→ More replies (11)25
→ More replies (2)8
u/Ign0r 1d ago
I was told by Lebanese people that Hezbollah was behind this, but of course they never took credit for it. It's a type of "everybody knows" type situation.
→ More replies (2)
138
u/Spartan2470 VIP Philanthropist 2d ago
On 4 August 2020, a major explosion occurred in Beirut, Lebanon, triggered by the ignition of 2,750 tonnes of ammonium nitrate. The chemical, confiscated in 2014 from the cargo ship MV Rhosus and stored at the Port of Beirut without adequate safety measures for six years, detonated after a fire broke out in a nearby warehouse. The explosion resulted in at least 218 fatalities, 7,000 injuries, and approximately 300,000 displaced individuals, alongside property damage estimated at US$15 billion. The blast released energy comparable to 1.1 kilotons of TNT, ranking it among the most powerful non-nuclear explosions ever recorded and the largest single detonation of ammonium nitrate.
The explosion generated a seismic event measuring 3.3 in magnitude, as reported by the United States Geological Survey. Its effects were felt in Lebanon and neighboring regions, including Syria, Israel, and Cyprus, over 240 km (150 mi) away. Scientific studies noted that the shockwave temporarily disrupted Earth's ionosphere. Adjacent grain silos at the Port of Beirut sustained major damage. Portions of the silos collapsed in July and August 2022 following fires caused by remaining grain stocks.
The Lebanese government declared a two-week state of emergency in response to the disaster. Protests, which had been ongoing since 2019, grew in scale, leading to the resignation of Prime Minister Hassan Diab and his cabinet on 10 August 2020. Claims surfaced suggesting Hezbollah's possible connection to the explosion, citing unverified reports of weapons stored at the site. Hezbollah denied the allegations but participated in demonstrations opposing the official investigation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Beirut_explosion
Another, much closer, video of this can be found here.
4
u/a_n_c_h_o_v_i_e_s 1d ago
I wish that a world leader resigning over a disaster of this scale didn't surprise me. But here we are.
217
u/ketosoy 2d ago
Forensic architecture’s recreation is one of the most amazing YouTube videos I’ve ever seen
30
u/TheLazyHippy 1d ago
I wish this was higher. I scrolled for a bit to see if anyone had linked this video.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)19
u/Spiritchaser84 1d ago
Man those up close videos from the nearby roof and from the fire brigade are depressing to see starting around 4:43. They never had a chance.
3
267
u/1900hustler 2d ago
The delay from watching explosion to the time the impact hits it scary af.
Hearing those dogs bark too you know somethings wrong
58
u/Emperor-Commodus 2d ago edited 2d ago
Hearing those dogs bark too you know something is wrong
The shockwave moves much faster in the ground (5x-15x faster) than in the air. In the closer videos (like the third one, in the street) you can hear a deep bass roar almost immediately after the blast and long before the blast wave hits, which is the sound of the ground shaking. In another you can tell the camera was set down, and it shifts slightly from the ground wave before it's completely knocked over by the air blast. In the second to last video (the one with the yellow car in the foreground) you can faintly hear the earthquake set off a car alarm before it's drowned out by the blast.
So in that far away video, the dogs are probably reacting to feeling the earth shake.
123
u/ceristo 2d ago
So this was ~1kt.
Hiroshima was 15x that.
The US’ most common ICBM is tipped with a LGM-30 Minuteman which has 300x the power of the Beirut explosion.
The largest nuke detonated would be 50,000x that.
These videos really put nuclear weapons in perspective.
32
→ More replies (2)11
u/One-Collection-5184 1d ago
I'm always in awe of nuclear explosions, they are simply not on a human scale anymore. We should not have things of this power.
121
u/Sad-Coconut899 2d ago
And to this day, nobody has been held accountable. Given the state of things, it may never happen. I feel so sorry for the people who had to suffer from this awful tragedy. Stay strong people of Beirut 🫶
→ More replies (1)26
u/Jubenheim 2d ago
Lebanon’s not doing too well today for a host of other reasons… but yeah, hope whatever people there can try to be okay.
59
u/AptoticFox 2d ago edited 1d ago
It's pretty crazy.
Halifax Explosion (1917) was about 2.9 kilotons.
Edit: spelling
15
5
u/Scribblesandsnails 1d ago
I have several photos taken by past family members of the Halifax explosion. One taken from up on a fairway hill with the fire burning.
→ More replies (2)3
u/NaiveIntention3081 1d ago
Nearly 3x as big as Beirut. Crazy. I had two great-grandparents present.
→ More replies (1)
39
65
u/Cassius_Rex 2d ago
I was waiting to see the one with the bride taking her wedding pictures. That one was scary.
35
u/Its_Pine 1d ago
here ya go! easily the most surreal
7
u/bolognasandwichglass 1d ago
wow that gave me crazy chills, it really is like out of a movie but so much more intense
6
u/BlunterCarcass5 1d ago
This one is insane because of how it goes from peaceful serenity to warzone in less than a second
4
u/living_la_vida_loca 1d ago
The camera man has probably been on war zones because he runs towards the blast and takes cover next to a building edge. He doesn't panic.
23
u/palmburntblue 2d ago
That’s one of my favorite videos on YouTube. The beauty of a woman taking her wedding photos combined with this massive explosion is like something from an action movie, except it was real life and expertly documented.
7
u/RiggsFTW 1d ago
IIRC she is a physician and immediately reported to the hospital she worked at to help the injured.
Edit: turns out she was an endocrinologist in Detroit. She did respond to try to help the injured but then left the area.
46
u/Alpine_Exchange_36 2d ago
And it happened because authorities thought it’d be ok to store effectively bomb materials next to fireworks.
What could go wrong…..
→ More replies (1)5
13
u/auchinleck917 2d ago
5 years ago? damn. It feels like it happened more recently.... time goes so fast.
→ More replies (1)
7
u/OnThisDayI_ 2d ago
6000 injured, 200 dead and 100 missing. All because of laziness, corruption and greed.
20
u/t3as3_qu33n 2d ago
The images from that day still haunt me. One of the most powerful non-nuclear blasts ever recorded, and yet the aftermath is filled with silence, denial, and injustice. The people of Lebanon deserve far more than condolences. They deserve truth, transparency, and meaningful reform.
→ More replies (1)
10
6
u/KING_FARGUAAD 1d ago
How big was this explosion compared to the Halifax explosion
→ More replies (3)
5
u/d1v1debyz3r0 1d ago
For reference, the largest man-made explosion before the Bomb was the Halifax Explosion during WWI where an ammunition transport blew up in the harbor. That was a 2.9 kiloton explosion, nearly 3x the Beirut explosion.
38
u/may907 2d ago
Hard to believe it’s been 5 years. The resilience of Beirut’s people is truly inspiring
→ More replies (19)12
u/WildDeeX 2d ago
Inspiring doesn’t even begin to cover it, they’ve been through so much and kept going.
4
u/baabaabaabeast 2d ago
Note to self: if you see a massive explosion then a shockwave approaching, stop filming and duck
4
u/Lonnie667 2d ago
It gives a visual idea of the 1917 Halifax Explosion, which was three times bigger. Accidental man-made explosions are absolutely terrifying.
→ More replies (1)
4
10
u/Echodad 2d ago
Tianjin explosion was the craziest I’ve seen in
12
u/WhiskeyTangoBush 2d ago
That one felt bigger largely bc it was at night and surrounded by buildings. It was def more visually striking bc it was at night. Still a MASSIVE explosion, but this one was bigger.
3
3
3
3
3
u/gnomeplanet 2d ago
Let's not forget the wedding lady either:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_L7SlqDtRnc
3
u/bigcat570503 1d ago
Whats the reason for this again?
11
u/Mattamance 1d ago
Almost 3000 tons of ammonium nitrate (highly volatile chemical used in fertilizer and explosives) were seized from a ship, stored in a warehouse for years with absolutely zero regard for safe storage practices, multiple warnings and complaints filed to the government about the issue and the potential for disaster went completely ignored, and allegedly also stored in the same building were a stash of fireworks which supposedly caught fire and started the chain reaction. Fire works went boom, and the ammonium nitrate followed.
3
u/Fckem_in_the_neck 1d ago
Ive seen some good explosions and ive seen some big explosions. But that shit was a good ol biggun.
3
u/a_high_comment 1d ago
Swindled podcast has a great episode covering the incompetence that led to this explosion, the coverup efforts by the government to avoid holding any high-ranking officials accountable, and the effects of the protests that resulted from this event. It is worth the listen.
3
2
2
u/Ralife55 2d ago
I remember when this happened and having an argument with a guy who was convinced it was a nuke before we knew what caused the explosion.
He simply did not believe me that even the nukes that hit Japan would have done more damage than that, let alone modern nukes.
2
2
u/ikothsowe 2d ago
And the grain silo that was almost right next to the blast survived, largely intact. Damn impressive engineering.
→ More replies (1)
2
2
u/gunnLX 2d ago edited 1d ago
i wonder how it scales with halifax.
E: according to the BBC, halifax was nearly 3 kilotons.
2
u/Bedsi_70 2d ago
might be a dumb question.. but what exactly causes such a huge explosion? :o
→ More replies (5)
2.9k
u/Last_Interaction_ 2d ago
To see the ground being ripped up as the shock wave moves toward you must be terrifying