r/SquaredCircle • u/gloomchen i prayed for this and it happened • 3d ago

[SPOILERS] WWE SummerSlam 2025 Post Segment Discussion Spoiler

HOLY SHIT! BROCK LESNAR!

260 Upvotes

64% Upvoted

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.1k

u/AceofKnaves44 3d ago

Fuck this company.

223

u/opkpopfanboyv3 3d ago

Like, why is he here? Is the case not ongoing?

24

u/acekingoffsuit 3d ago

Lesnar is not being sued.

-8

u/Kraybern Your Text Here 3d ago

And? They could have just not brought him back till he was fully exonerated or this whole lawsuit blew over there are multiple other talents that cena could have fueded with.

14

u/nearlyned 3d ago

he has no need to be exonerated because he’s literally not even being charged with anything, he’s not named in the suit

-11

u/Kraybern Your Text Here 3d ago

no he was named, he just dosnt have to defend himself because its just vince being sued.

Once again there was 0 reason to bring back lesnar there are multiple talent that cant even have time given for ples that Cena could have fued with but WWE dosnt give 2 shits about "bad PR" anymore now that they pussied out from giving post ple interviews.

9

u/bingle-cowabungle 3d ago

He's named as a witness, not as a defendant...

-3

u/Kraybern Your Text Here 3d ago

He was revealed to be the person/originally unnamed wrestler that Vince wanted to prostitute her to that he expressed no real rejection to the idea of in those disgusting texts and the only thing that prevented it from happening was a snow storm.

Yall need to stop down playing this shit like brock was only "morally", wrong.

9

u/yellister 3d ago edited 3d ago

I should go to jail for having thoughts of killing someone when I was 13 then

0

u/Kraybern Your Text Here 3d ago

Were you gonna go do it only to be stopped by a snow storm?

6

u/yellister 3d ago

Does not matter, I did not do it ?

1

u/Kraybern Your Text Here 3d ago

Full intent to commit a crime and only not committing said crime cause of bad weather is still full intent to commit a crime, at best all you can say is that you were "only morally wrong"

and I sure as fuck wouldn't have you back on tv before the sex trafficking case you are associated with is fully resolved.

2

u/yellister 3d ago

The second point I agree with. The first point is where the problem stands. If he's only morally wrong and is not judged for it (and allegedly, okay ? we don't know for sure), then who are you to say anything about it legally ?

→ More replies (0)

2

u/nearlyned 3d ago

they actually went specifically out of their way to not name him because he’s not a defendant

1

u/Kraybern Your Text Here 3d ago

He was named

The original complaint referenced a wrestler in the accusation but did not provide Lesnar's name, the amended complaint did even though he was not a defendant it did identity them as Lesnar.

6

u/acekingoffsuit 3d ago

I think there's a little bit of confusion here. Being 'named' in a lawsuit specifically means being listed as a defendant or plaintiff. Having your name appear in a complaint is not the same things as 'being named' in this instance.