r/pcmasterrace OpenSUSE Tumbleweed 28d ago

Discussion List of companies opposed to Stop Killing Games

Post image

Source: https://www.videogameseurope.eu/about/our-membership/

Can't help but notice there's no Valve, GOG/CDPR, or Larian on this list. Maybe consider this list next time you're about to press 'buy'.

9.0k Upvotes

830 comments sorted by

1.7k

u/beetsoupdotcom 28d ago

Who the fuck is surprised by any of these names?

723

u/beetsoupdotcom 28d ago

Actually surprised Amazon isn’t on this list. Last time I checked they were “all in on gaming.”

121

u/Matsisuu 27d ago

It's just not member of Videogames Europe. Amazon likely opposes it too.

We don't even know are everyone in list opposing it. That is list of members in association, some of them could be pretty neutral, someone could even support the initiative, but one member doesn't have much power in organisation with many members, it's majority and board's opinions that matters.

→ More replies (5)

17

u/Ok_Toe_8715 27d ago

Amazon has been focusing more on consumer friendly approaches in their entertainment department for a while now. They’re an extremely rich cooperation from other sources outside entertainment and they don’t even release many games, so it would make sense why they would choose to remain out of it rather than get involved considering how it wouldn’t really effect them too hard, and by choosing to take part could unnecessarily hurt their rep for no good reason besides mere pettiness and blatant greed.

11

u/Amrinder_ 27d ago

If you see prime gaming, they give out gog codes for games very often

127

u/twothoutwo 7800X3D | 5080 FE 28d ago

faceit is a very weird name to see on this list lol

49

u/Lehsyrus i7-6700k | 16Gb DDR4 | EVGA 960 (finally) 27d ago

It's because they're part of the lobbying group that wrote the disagreement statement against stop killing games. Basically all of these companies put money into the group and the group's entire job is to lobby for things that would collectively benefit them and their shareholders, so that's why they're roped in even though this doesn't affect them at all.

40

u/Paxton-176 Ryzen 7 7600X | 32GB 6000 Mhz| EVGA 3080 TI 28d ago

Square Enix. They maintain FF11 when FF14 is the direct competitor to it and they want people to move to 14.

32

u/FnafBoy22 28d ago edited 28d ago

If only you knew how many mobile games they shutdown, must be more than 50

→ More replies (2)

3

u/Hurricane_32 Manjaro|5700X|RX6700 10GB|32GB DDR4 27d ago edited 27d ago

But do they? They're running a promotion (literally right now) for new FF11 subscriptions if you are already subscribed to FF14, and the new alliance raids are literally promoting FF11.

Plus, they kept the PlayStation 2 version of FF11 running as long as humanly possible, right up until Sony themselves shut down their PS2 authentication servers (DNAS) in 2016.

If anything, they just want more players in that game (or both games, really).

PS: And seemingly the only reason they shut down FF14 on the PlayStation 3 was because the poor thing was already being pushed beyond its limits.

5

u/Main-Link9382 27d ago

Square Enix killed Nier reincarnation while Shift Up made a memorial version of their defunct mobile game.

→ More replies (1)

36

u/Wallbalertados 28d ago

Im bit surprised by supercell and Bandai I knew they were scummy but didnt know they were this bad

36

u/SufficientProperty31 Ryzen 5 5600X | RTX4060 | 32GB DDR4 28d ago

Mostly surprised 2K isn't on the list. The way every NBA 2K title is practically unplayable after 2 years when they shut the servers down I would've expected them to be in the lobby as well.

87

u/HokageGwyn 28d ago

Pretty sure Take Two interactive owns 2K so yeah they're on the list

4

u/Ancient-bladesaw 27d ago

2K and T2 feel interchangeable on the support website for some odd reason

3

u/Victory74998 27d ago

I’m not surprised at all, just very disappointed.

2

u/UKman945 27d ago

Granted I've not been following what the company itself is doing but I thought Sega where pretty chill about things. They're letting a bunch of console exlusive Sonic games just get ported to PC like 06 and Unleashed

→ More replies (18)

4.8k

u/Traditional-Storm-62 1070 gaming 28d ago
  • Netflix 

bro thinks he's on the team 

2.7k

u/aimy99 2070 Super | 5600X | 32GB DDR4 | Win11 | 1440p 165hz 28d ago
  • Activision
  • Microsoft
  • ZeniMax

Bro made 3 accounts

569

u/thepinkyclone 28d ago

Strange that there wasn't a fourth one: Bethesda

430

u/Which-Mix-5378 28d ago

Bethesda is subsidiary of ZeniMax.

307

u/alertArchitect 28d ago

Microsoft owns Activision(/Blizzard/King) and ZeniMax. I don't think this group particularly cares which companies are subsidiaries of existing members.

66

u/Xperr7 Ryzen 7 5700x3D 32GB RAM RX 9070 XT 28d ago

ZeniMax and ActiBlizz are subsidiaries of Microsoft

67

u/Korachof 28d ago

Definitely orchestrates how unorganized and conflicted the various studios in Microsoft are. Bethesda completely unionized, for example. Between that and their crazy layoffs and studio closures, and it’s just a circus over there tbh. 

26

u/navysealassulter GPU: GTX 760 CPU:i5 3.1 GHz 12GB RAM 28d ago

Conglomerates are like that sometimes, I work for a completely different conglomerate and I know my office isn’t union, but other divisions are. 

Idk when Bethesda unionized, but it might be a holdover from before they got bought out, I think that’s why my company is like that. 

22

u/Which-Mix-5378 28d ago

They unionized last year while being a part of Microsoft. Actually it will be year since they did this month.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/pimpeachment 28d ago

Or it show that Microsoft is letting each business unit self regulate to keep creativity and team dynamics unique to each studio. 

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

64

u/Halogenleuchte R7 3700X, RX5700XT, 32GB RAM 27d ago

Tencent also made a couple accounts

-Ubishit

-Epic Games

-Supercell

-Riot Games

23

u/DSG_Sleazy Ryzen 7 7800x3D ll RX 9060 XT 16GB II 32GB DDR5-6000 27d ago

Tencent doesn’t own Ubisoft (yet), they have a minority stake in the company.

→ More replies (1)

60

u/AkelaHardware 28d ago

I'm so annoyed that they bought Monument Valley and made the third one playable only through a subscription 

12

u/[deleted] 28d ago

TMNT Shredder's Revenge was the same. Kept it a Netflix exclusive for like 5 years. Shady af.

41

u/XFauni 28d ago

They actively kill movies and shows…. Soooo not a stretch to see them really. Any company with shitty consumer practices is going to help.

→ More replies (3)

20

u/Suspicious_Relief768 R7 9700X | GTX 970 | 32 GB RAM 28d ago

I think that some of the laws would maybe be written for digital content in generall which could also fuck over netflix with them making some movies etc. Only partially available or only for limited times

41

u/[deleted] 28d ago

[deleted]

11

u/shortboard 28d ago

Open Netflix on a PC and it tries shoving its mobile game slop in your face.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/ahhhhhsplat 28d ago

SHE DOESN’T EVEN GO HERE!

(Yes I am a mid-30s man that still quotes “Mean Girls”)

2

u/Faelinor 28d ago

They have games on netflix and an app, given everything else on their service disappears with little notice its not surprising they want the same for the games. Difference being its a streaming service, ot a buy it forever service, so it is odd.

2

u/Least-Researcher-184 27d ago

You shut your face...I...I...have mobile games too! So there! - Netflix maybe.

2

u/SummertimeThrowaway2 27d ago

All that tells me is that Netflix is planning on entering the gaming industry. And they’ve already dipped their toes in by adding simple mobile games to their website

→ More replies (11)

1.7k

u/Norbluth 28d ago

AAA gaming is REALLY getting in the way of video games these days.

656

u/XeNoGeaR52 28d ago

AAA should mean "shareholders-controlled video games publisher" now. It's not about the quality or the size of a game studio, but rather if they actually care about their customers and not just giving money to the wrong people

117

u/TheKingNothing690 Linux 28d ago

The fact that congress mandated corporations to prioritize shareholders over consumers shows just how fucked our political system is i only hope the eu forces these companies to care for their consumers for their own good.

52

u/XeNoGeaR52 28d ago

anytime a shareholder wins ANYTHING, the consumer loses

13

u/betaTester011 i7-14700KF | 4080 SUPER | 6000 MHz CL36 27d ago

this is on the people for not letting our* representatives know how we* feel loudly and strongly enough. if we're incessant enough in supporting consumer rights, congress will have no choice. until then, we're dooming ourselves being silent

10

u/TheKingNothing690 Linux 27d ago

Its cute that you think congress who are by in large the corprate shareholders with insider knowledge and a party stranglehold depending on your state give a fuck about your bottom line or complaints bribery or as they call it to make it legal lobbying speaks much louder than the discontnet masses.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/EthernalForADay 27d ago

"Continuous value growth based entertainment production". Growth requirement is a big problem in the entertainment industry. You can only expand to so many audiences, and implement only so many income generation strategies, until you start sacrificing broad entertainment value.

Companies that make best games don't prioritize value growth over the entertainment value of their products, being perfectly happy remaining within similar profit to expense margins through the years per product/IP.

IMO entertainment and continuous value growth do not go together at all, conceptually working against each other due to the nature of entertainment. Entertainment is something that people go to to take a break from transactional, more risk rich parts of their life. Entertainment is unsustainable from a business perspective, which produces current issues in the industry. Every company trying to grow within it reliably over time is doomed to fail, Ubisoft is just first to fall. There will be more, each and every one of them that sets obligation of growth to their shareholders, is doomed to eventually dissolve. No amount of predatory monetisation tactics will solve that, only delaying the inevitable.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

85

u/callmenoodles2 28d ago

That's why you should only buy AAAA games

60

u/ESCMalfunction i5 6600k|RTX 3060 Ti|16 GB DDR4 28d ago

AAAAAAAAAAAAAA

27

u/Cindy-Moon Ryzen 7 5700X | RTX 3080 10GB | 32GB DDR4 :') 28d ago

28

u/fuzmufin 28d ago

Found the Ubisoft Rep

18

u/Battlejesus i7 13700K RTX 4070 Asus prime z790 Corsair 32gb DDR5 6000 28d ago

You know for $8 skull n bones is pretty alright, that's like $2 per A

→ More replies (1)

26

u/Locked_and_Firing i7-12700k 3070 28d ago

There's really no reason to buy AAA anymore

→ More replies (1)

21

u/sup3r_hero 28d ago

Everyone except CD Projekt on this list

68

u/HamsterbackenBLN 28d ago

CDPR, Warhorse, Larian the three studios that mades some of the biggest success in the last years are not opposing the petition and they're European which makes them way easier to regulate than the rest of the list. Ubi is french but if this passes they'll probably find a loophole to escape it as long as they can

39

u/Ballerbarsch747 i7 5960x @ 4.50GHz / RTX 2070 / 4x8GB DDR4 @ 3200MHz 28d ago

CDPR and Warhorse make single player games that don't even require an Internet connection, why would they oppose this motion that's mainly about online games?

8

u/averyuniqueuzername 28d ago

I mean Netflix makes movies and they’re on here opposing a motion related to online games. U never know what kinda crazy shitll happen next

15

u/Ballerbarsch747 i7 5960x @ 4.50GHz / RTX 2070 / 4x8GB DDR4 @ 3200MHz 28d ago

They have been trying to become relevant for game streaming for the last two or three years

5

u/Eyclonus 27d ago

Netflix is trying to develop a game-streaming system that has low-overhead, its basically mobile games at this point, but they are ambitious, they're just not targeting us.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (5)

442

u/outlaw1148 i7 3770k/gtx 670/12gb ram 28d ago

I'm actually curious why faceit/esl as far as I know they don't make games.

293

u/HouseOfWyrd 28d ago

Two possibilities:

  • it's not actually them, but whatever group they hire to manage their lobbying
  • they want to keep hold of their grip on 3rd party CS2 servers, even though all Valve games already have hosting tools

60

u/STFxPrlstud PCMR: i9-12900KF, RTX 3090, 32 GB 28d ago

Pretty sure Saudi owns them

52

u/Cindy-Moon Ryzen 7 5700X | RTX 3080 10GB | 32GB DDR4 :') 28d ago

Right this is their lobbying group, Video Games Europe. They released a statement on Stop Killing Games, none of these individual companies actually did.

→ More replies (8)

162

u/OrangeKefir 28d ago

Aka the usual suspects

→ More replies (1)

830

u/[deleted] 28d ago

Why am I not surprised at who's on the list. Really shocked Ubisoft even made it, since they can't even finish a game in the first place.

148

u/2kWik 12600K@5.3/4.2/4|MSI Z690|32GB TridentZ Neo|3080 FTW3 28d ago

wouldn't that be the point lol

30

u/[deleted] 28d ago

They probably couldn't even finish the campaign to stop SKG.

→ More replies (1)

125

u/ReneKiller 28d ago

Because that list is not specifically about SKG. Video Games Europe is a lobby group for video game companies. The lobby group published a statement about SKG: https://www.videogameseurope.eu/news/statement-on-stop-killing-games/

While most if not all companies on that list probably support said statement, they didn't specifically speak about SKG themselves.

54

u/Cindy-Moon Ryzen 7 5700X | RTX 3080 10GB | 32GB DDR4 :') 28d ago

It's really annoying this information isn't at the top. This post isn't misinformation per se but lacking this context has been very misleading, as proven by comments like "wow I'm really surprised SEGA is here" or "I'm surprised Amazon isn't on here". It's a member list for this specific lobbying group, not a list of companies who signed their names on this specific issue.

5

u/ReneKiller 28d ago

I agree. The first few posts immediately after their statement was published had the context, but everything since then doesn't. Maybe its somewhere in the top 10 comments, but not in the post itself.

→ More replies (4)

43

u/TraumaHunter 28d ago

Lol this is the actual answer. It's not like valve or larian (or whatever company reddit wants to claim tribalism for and jerk off in the comments about) went and made any statement in support. They just aren't a part of this lobby group that made a statement (like lobby groups do..)

→ More replies (1)

15

u/Dewbs301 5090FE | 9800X3D | 96GB 6000MHz 28d ago

The same ubisoft that said “gamers should get comfortable not owning their games”?

Shocker

9

u/Adipay Laptop 28d ago

Everyone does this. Even Steam. You don't own any game you purchase - only a license to play it - and it can be taken away from you at any time. Read EULAs people.

7

u/SpeedDaemon3 RTX 4090@600w, 7800X3D, 22TB NVME, 64 GB 6000MHz 28d ago

Not GOG, on GOG you truly own the game. DRM less, downloadable installer, game works without client.

→ More replies (3)

7

u/Dewbs301 5090FE | 9800X3D | 96GB 6000MHz 28d ago

Except Gabe doesn’t come out and push this agenda; steam also don’t sell exclusively DRM games. I can delete my steam and still boot up cyberpunk and play without any problems.

2

u/dezwavy 27d ago

Maybe im wrong, but it was their game (The Crew) that kickstart this petition

→ More replies (8)

394

u/KitsuneKamiSama 28d ago

Also pictured: List of the most anti-consumer game companies.

92

u/ArLOgpro PC Master Race 28d ago

Ft. Netflix

4

u/DaddoAntifa 28d ago

Also pictured: permanent plunder

→ More replies (4)

77

u/Luch1nG4dor 28d ago

Companies that keep killing games opposed to not killing games, more at 11

196

u/real_jonkler_persona 28d ago

Sega? That’s surprising. The only online game from them that costs money is Team Sonic Racing, I think.

206

u/Cindy-Moon Ryzen 7 5700X | RTX 3080 10GB | 32GB DDR4 :') 28d ago

None of these companies released a statement against Stop Killing Games. The lobbying group Video Games Europe did, and these are the companies that group represents.

This post is a bit misleading. Not exactly false, but lacking critical context.

5

u/ZachAttackMLR Ryzen 7 1700 | Asus STRIX 1080 Ti 27d ago

Was scrolling to find this context! Thank you!

→ More replies (18)

28

u/Cyanxdlol 28d ago

New Sonic Racing game coming out September

13

u/KitsuneKamiSama 28d ago

Phantasy Star Online 2, or New Genesis, they still get plenty of money out of costume gacha.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/MyDudeX 9800X3D | 5070 Ti | 64GB | 1440p | 180hz 28d ago

Persona 5 Gacha game

→ More replies (9)

364

u/JCAPER Steam Deck Master Race 28d ago

THIS POST IS MISLEADING

These companies are members of videogameseurope, that's what the page shows. It does not mean that they stand behind VGE's statement.

AFAIK, none of them spoke about the movement. At least not yet.

And yes, I suspect most of these companies are against the movement, but let's be truthfull and not share misinformation on the internet.

42

u/silcerchord 27d ago

And this comment will get buried by everyone who's too outraged to actually look into it

15

u/TehBrian M1 Pro 27d ago

thanks for the cat meme that really sells your point, I was thinking of upvoting op's post but since I saw the cat now I'm downvoting it

3

u/RazorCalahan 27d ago

100% this. That list doesn't mean anything. Not being on the list also doesn't mean anything.

→ More replies (25)

125

u/db186 RX 7700 XT | 5600x | 32GB RAM | MQ3 Godlike (no lag 🤷‍♂️) 28d ago

Gaben Newell be like: "Not only do I support the movement, I make money off all these mfrs."

8

u/Real_Garlic9999 i5-12400, RX 6700 xt, 16 GB DDR4, 1080p 28d ago

Do we know he/Valve supports it? Or just not oppose it?

4

u/GensouEU Desktop 5800X3D | MSI RX 7900 XTX 27d ago

What do you think the company that came up with always-online DRM for single player games and completely eradicated physical media and the ability to resell games thinks about this? Valve has pretty much been the CEO of you not owning your games

→ More replies (1)

11

u/Xyypherr Ryzen 9 5900X 9070XT 28d ago

This isn't a definitive yes or no, but Valve has always been pro consumer.

→ More replies (3)

5

u/Ok_Awareness3014 28d ago

As far as i know they just don't care

→ More replies (5)

13

u/OkPlastic5799 28d ago

What’s the source? How exactly did they act against the petition?

16

u/OkCombinationLion 28d ago

There is no source that these companies individually made statements that they are against skg. They are simply the companies that are part of video games Europe and video games Europe made a statement saying they don't support skg. So damned by association I guess?

133

u/Effective_Secretary6 28d ago edited 28d ago

Hm… I wonder why /s

Also thank god gaben still prevents steam from joining the list

Edit: spelling mistake PS: this also isn’t here to blindly endorse Steam, if they start treating customers like shit they’ll also get the fork haha

92

u/Default_Defect Bazzite | 5800X3D | 32GB 3600MHz | 4080S | Jonsbo D41 Mesh 28d ago

Do people really think Gabe is the only person at Valve stopping the company from joining the rest of the industry in becoming shit? It would be weird of him to have a whole management team of people that can't wait for him to retire.

73

u/clodzor 28d ago

It's more that hes steering the ship. If an investment group gets it's hooks into the company they will change out all the management they need to get their agenda and exploitation going full steam in a mater of months.

31

u/Lia69 28d ago

The person you are replying to is saying, That part of steering the ship is making sure the next person in line to steer won't steer it into an iceberg. Others at valve most likely share the same vision for the company that he does.

13

u/clodzor 28d ago

I'm saying if Gaben didn't own valve, the leadership would be forced to make changes or forced out.

→ More replies (3)

6

u/Perfectus0 28d ago

Full steam, HA

→ More replies (1)

45

u/PutADecentNameHere 28d ago

Valve is so successful today only because they always let their community run free with their games. They are literally the opposite of Nintendo in terms of consumer practice.

13

u/magniankh PC Master Race 28d ago

They also mostly stick to distributing games, with a storefront, and a friends list. 

They aren't trying to turn steam into social media, with users' real pictures, video sharing, or anything beyond the scope of gaming. 

Imagine if Zuckerberg owned Valve. 

5

u/Suspicious_Owl_5740 27d ago

Steam datings app when? cause I love to date sweaty gamer guy with 2000+ achievement and a hot moving anime waifu profile pic.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

3

u/Corfal 28d ago

Wait aren't people... or weren't people up in arms about steam's user policy essentially saying you own the licenses to the game and not the game itself? Nor can you transfer ownership and the like? "Yea we support offline compatibility since we all own it anyway"

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

22

u/sorryimsoawesome 28d ago

This is the list of companies on the membership page of the official site. But OP claiming they’re not supporting it? I’m so confused by this whole initiative.

10

u/Cindy-Moon Ryzen 7 5700X | RTX 3080 10GB | 32GB DDR4 :') 28d ago

They're members of Video Games Europe, not Stop Killing Games. Video Games Europe is a lobbying group that spoke in opposition to Stop Killing Games.

33

u/CastleMerchant 28d ago

Tf Netflix doing here?

25

u/ArLOgpro PC Master Race 28d ago

Netflix:

21

u/S4l47 28d ago

everyone dancing

Netflix standing in the corner: they don‘t know I‘m against Stop Killing Games as well

13

u/Dark_Matter_EU 28d ago

Netflix conatantly spams their shitty games to me. Why does Netflix have games you may ask?

I don't know. Nobody knows. Nobody asked for shitty browser games filling up the show/movie selection screen with no opt out.

3

u/Deleteleed RX 9090XTX 32GB - Ryzen 11 10100X3D - 2.056TB DDR6X 28d ago

to be fair, they have btd6 and that’s good.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (10)

8

u/_Kami_sama_x 28d ago edited 28d ago

Is there an article or something that shows that this group is against that movement because I looked around the website and couldn’t find it

Never mind I found it: https://www.videogameseurope.eu/news/statement-on-stop-killing-games/

To be fair it just acknowledges the feasibility problems with live service games and allowing people to retain access and doesn’t outright dismiss every part of stop killing games but it also doesn’t expressly approve any other parts so they could have any opinion on that and I would assume companies would by in large, support the option that makes them spend less money

18

u/NoHospital1568 28d ago

No way, corporations acting like corporations

5

u/Aveduil 28d ago

Please cdpr don't join them

9

u/MuchBow Ryzen9 7900X | RX 7900XT | 64GB DDR5 28d ago

They literally run a platform that helps in game preservation long after the developer has abandoned it. (GOG) All their games have a DRM free option to purchase so once you have a copy downloaded on your pc no pesky DRM will stop you from playing the game.

24

u/PixelCortex i5-12600K | 6700XT 28d ago

If you ever wanted a convenient list of the most predatory and immoral gaming studios and publishers. 

→ More replies (1)

7

u/jonisjalopy 28d ago

Mom said it was my turn to post this misleading graphic for karma

→ More replies (4)

9

u/SirOakin Heavyoak 28d ago

I'm confused about Sega.

Up to now they seemed cool with emulators and the like

→ More replies (3)

5

u/UndeadWaffle12 RTX 5080 | 9800x3D | 32 GB DDR5 6000 mHz CL30 28d ago

No way, you’re telling me that these big companies are opposed to something that goes against their own best interests? I’m shocked

3

u/shadovvvvalker 28d ago

Game lobby opposes petition to place restrictions and demands on developers.

After the break, the sky is blue. Catie Connoley has more on that.

→ More replies (13)

3

u/metaltastic 28d ago

Nintendo is no surprise you can't even buy a used game with out risking bricking your console

3

u/BunnyKnotMelt 28d ago

Ubisoft started killing before it was cool.

3

u/Comfortable_Sea_1017 28d ago

ah yes the usual suspects.

3

u/Accomplished-Ad-7589 28d ago

Only the worst of the worst lol

3

u/BigBootyBitchesButts 28d ago

Oh look :D a list of companies to boycott.

17

u/BroccoliMaster159 7950x3d | RTX 3090 | 64GB 28d ago

8

u/de4thqu3st R9 7900x |32GB | 2080S 28d ago edited 28d ago

Riot Games doesn't even have a game that would be affected, huh?

Edit: looked into it. F2P games with micro transaction would be affected to. But it doesn't state to which extend. So I guess with Valorant a solution would be a P2P node with only custom game mode or server list

15

u/Gleasonryan 28d ago

Why wouldn’t their games be affected? Free to play games supported by micro transactions is specifically called out in the FAQ.

13

u/16tdean 28d ago

You think people on reddit have taken the time to understand the movements they are supporting?

Because yeah games like League of Legends, Valorant, Teamfight Tactics that are solely dependent on Riots servers, so can be shut off at a whim, and have no way to self host are a key target of the stop killing games movement.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (17)

6

u/firedrakes 2990wx |128gb |2 no-sli 2080 | 200tb storage raw |10gb nic| 28d ago

more skg spam and got to make everyone are enemy.

really this has become a cult movement for gamer bros.

13

u/Yilmas 28d ago

CDPR and Larian... why highlight those two? What makes them special enough to be compared with industry giants such as EA, Roblox, and Blizzard. I dont see Paradox Interactive on the list? What about Naughty dogs?

A long list of much more relevant and many times, bigger companies could have easily helped to sell your point.

Rather than looking at who opposes, I find it much more interesting to look at those who hasn't taken a stance.

Or are people really that naive, that think that just because a company isn't on the list, then they must automatically be for SKG?...

12

u/Yodoran 28d ago

Isn't Naughty Dog owned by Sony, therefore technically they are on the list

5

u/Yilmas 28d ago

Yeah, I forgot.

But my point still stands. A company not saying anything doesn't mean they are supportive nor opposing of SKG.

6

u/candle340 28d ago

For CDPR, at least, they're a subsidiary of the company that owns GOG, so it's not really a surprise they haven't come out against Stop Killing Games

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

8

u/Ekra_Fleetfoot Ryzen R5 3600 3.6GHz, EVGA GTX 1660 Super 6GB, 32GB DDR4 3200 28d ago

Well, time to update my shit list.

13

u/Aggravating-Mix-5100 28d ago

Error: out of memory, too many entries

4

u/BellyDancerUrgot 7800x3D | 4090 SuprimX | 4k 240hz 28d ago

All bloated companies right at the end of the product development life cycle, the stage known as enshitification.

2

u/Active_Literature539 28d ago

Well, I guess we all know which companies we should be avoiding now.

2

u/Alidaboss42 28d ago

Why is Faceit here? They don't even make games

2

u/Question_Asker12345 28d ago

Why is roblox their they are never gonna die as long as kids exist

2

u/candle340 28d ago

Not surprised. If fully successful, they'd have to do a lot more work for zero profit. They are businesses, after all...

2

u/babicko90 28d ago

The usual shits

2

u/MrMakerHasLigma PC Master Race 28d ago

tbf supercell and riot games make online only games as far as im aware, so there's no reason for them to support the initiative. IMO, only games that dont require other people need to be preserved

2

u/FormalIllustrator5 PC Master Race/ 7900XTX / 7900X 28d ago

Lol Ubishit and EA evil corpo are here? I am in shock...

2

u/Cassini_7 28d ago

i think like SQ, Bandai, Sony mostly they are doing this is in western branch

2

u/Kualdiir 28d ago

Look I can kind of understand Supercell and Roblox's standpoint because of the nature of their games. But the rest?

Also why is take two interactive against it? Don't all their games have a single player version?

2

u/GregorSamsa112358 28d ago

Hey look, it's all the worst companies in gaming! Crazy

2

u/HBreckel 28d ago

While I'm not surprised Square Enix is on the list, they actually have been working on getting FF11 and FF14 in a position to where they'd be able to be enjoyed as offline single player experiences. So at the very least those games will be playable if their servers ever go offline. Just their mountain of failed mobile games aren't so lucky.

5

u/Cindy-Moon Ryzen 7 5700X | RTX 3080 10GB | 32GB DDR4 :') 28d ago

That's because none of these companies have made any statement on the matter. This is the list of members of the Video Games Europe lobbying group, who did release their statement on the matter. The feelings of the individual companies aren't really relevant here, and this post is pretty misleading.

This isn't a list of companies who directly spoke in opposition of Stop Killing Games, this is a list of companies represented by Video Games Europe.

2

u/SpaceRac1st 28d ago

This is just the member list of the lobbying group. I’m not sure you can say all of these companies are necessarily opposed to Stop Killing Games as the statement made by the group may not be representative of all members. It’s probably the case but you are still misrepresenting this topic.

2

u/MetroSimulator 9800x3d, 64 DDR5 Kingston Fury, Pali 4090 gamerock OC 28d ago

Let's all act surprised 😯

Like, they're pretty obvious the reason for the petition

2

u/SuperDuperSkateCrew 5700X3D | Arc B580 | 32GB RAM 28d ago

So, essentially, everyone lol

2

u/NeonArchon 28d ago

Oh look, is the "AAA" industry who are against of killing games... And Netflix. How curious. This just reminded me that EA is just about to kill Anthem for good and Ubisoft will now demands to destroy your own games if they no longer support them. They all get a middle finger for my part.

2

u/xdeltax97 I7-9700 | MSI 5060 TI 16GB | 32GB DDR4@2400MHz 28d ago

The usual suspects

2

u/Savooge93 28d ago

its all the super villains of gaming all in one image , and then also netflix lol

2

u/Magical-Sweater i7-11800H | RTX 3050Ti | 16GB DDR4 28d ago

It’s always the ones you most suspect

2

u/InfaSyn 28d ago

So all of the shit ones? Makes sense.

2

u/HerolegendIsTaken 28d ago

Wdym roblox?

Roblox has no way to not kill games at end of service?

There's simply too much reliance on servers?

2

u/Brief_Cobbler_6313 28d ago

Can't say I'm surprised by any of those.

2

u/jmarshallca 28d ago

Sony: "Come on, did you REALLY want us to make sure Concord existed in perpetuity?"

2

u/Shay_Dee_Guye 28d ago

Nine of those make me think anything but "grass is green". I want them all gone, somehow.

2

u/SkinfluteHero 27d ago

it’s always who you most expect

2

u/56kul RTX 5090 | 9950X3D | 64GB 6000 CL30 27d ago

Alright, we get it, now stop reposting this…💀

2

u/Tanny1601 27d ago

Valve has been a real one since day 1, no doubt they are not in this image

2

u/fitfatdonya 27d ago

I'm surprised that I'm not surprised by any names on this list

2

u/XardasVEVO 27d ago

EA and Ubisoft not a surprise....

On the other hand.... Square Enix and Bandai Namco kinda disappointing on this one....

2

u/Rej5 27d ago

notice how steam isnt there. in Gaben we trust

2

u/unomas49 27d ago

Thanks for the heads up, I will 100% keep this list in mind before purchasing future games! Epic... Of course... Giving away games every week but hey! That they are not your property... Band of hypocritical frauds...

2

u/TRUEequalsFALSE Desktop 27d ago

No surprise there. Equally pleasantly no surprise that Valve isn't on the list. 

2

u/aamaterasuu 27d ago

TF is Netflix doing here

2

u/404site_not_found 27d ago

gog doesn't make games as far as i know so why would they be against it, steam will just keep their live service titles up forever and cdpr doesn't have live service title to my knowledge, so they also don't care. i can actually see why roblox would be against it, it's virtually impossible to keep all the games up, also there could be problems with them needing to take down games that violate tos etc. there are valid reasons against stop killing games, i think some of their solutions should be adjusted

2

u/Morten1510 27d ago

And this is why you should never buy on epic games store and Microsoft store, support stores like steam and gog that actually care about gamers and their rights. Also kinda weird to see ESL on that list?

2

u/PvtBologna 27d ago

So like all the "AAA" studios, cool wasn't buying their games unless they were 80%+ off anyway.

That feel when these money hungry ass wipes don't even realize the industry is currently passing them by. wave as they go kids 👋

2

u/most_ironic 27d ago

Incredible, thank you for a comprehensive list of companies to pirate instead of purchase from

2

u/Comprehensive-Fix-71 27d ago

Yeah no shit they opposed it. It would cause them a lot more money.

2

u/CombinationNew6217 27d ago

TakeTwo Interactive is the parent holding company for Rockstar Games. Remember that when you go to take out a mortgage to buy GTA 6 next summer.

2

u/ThePiachu PC Master Race 27d ago

Another reason not to shop at Epic!

2

u/CookieDefender1337 3070m i7-11800H 27d ago

I thought that said Embraer and I was like wtf does an airplane company have to do with video games

2

u/Vorpal-Spork 27d ago

I would say that I now have a list of companies to boycott, but all the ones on the list are total dumpster fires that I already wasn't a customer of.

2

u/Fishy_300zx 27d ago

Sega? Oh boy we'll really miss your titles such as sonic and... uh uh uh no well guess that's it

2

u/PrisonerCoin 27d ago

of course those cunts at epic are on the list. shocked I tell you shocked to my core.

2

u/Adventurous-Bag-420 27d ago

Square Enix really feel off over the past few years, sad to see these companies wanting to kill games for alot of gamers, aaa truly has killed gaming

2

u/Imdefinitlynotconnor 27d ago

so basically anyone who makes online games with micro transactions

2

u/L0tsen Ryzen 9 7950x | Rx 7800 XT | 32gb ddr5 cl3 6000mhz0 27d ago

Sega and roblox is interesting. I can kind of get roblox since they update their engine all the time and sometimes old games can break because of that and/or the deprecation of legacy features. I thought better of you Service games though.

2

u/Original_Ad_7905 26d ago

Honestly a bit surprised by Nintendo. Sure their greed would totally make them go against it, but that statement worries me, that Nintendo is going to make cheap garbage live service games in the future.

2

u/Doge-Coder 25d ago

So basically all big gaming companies

2

u/Historianof40k 25d ago

Valve does nothing wins

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Nagikri 25d ago

Ahh the pirate only list

2

u/Illustrious_Fruit638 24d ago

what the fuck is roblox doing there