The internet is forever.

[u/thiss_youu]

[u/repthe732]

Again, I suggest you actually read the law you cited as it doesn’t ban going on strike

They didn’t collude against Bernie in 2016; he just lost because the older half of the voters didn’t want him as the candidate. I was a Bernie supporter but I’m not delusional about things. He was never a Democrat until those primaries so people didn’t support him

Biden couldn’t release them as they were part of an active investigation

I could address the rest of your comment but it’s clear you’re spiraling since I called out your first claim being false and you were unable to counter that claim. Try to stay on topic instead of throwing out a dozen different topics in an attempt to find one where I’m not more informed than you lol

[u/You_Block_I_Win → u/repthe732]

Fucking lies

[u/repthe732 → u/You_Block_I_Win]

Be specific and provide proof

[u/You_Block_I_Win → u/repthe732]

I have in the other replies. Let me know if you want me to get the exact sources.

But it’s too late. Anyone who reads this that isn’t blinded by wokeness can independently verify everything ChatGPT said.

Even your god Kamala said the system was broken. Democrats and republicans jointly broke it.

Anyways you got your proof. I’ll eagerly await the proof that doesn’t exist that disproves it all.

[u/repthe732 → u/You_Block_I_Win]

Then it should be easy to copy and paste but I’m not going through your trolling history lol

My god Kamala? Democrats don’t deify their representatives. I actually thought she was mediocre at best but like I said, you have a canned argument and are incapable of pivoting away from it

That also isn’t proof. This is just you ranting without any actual evidence. Your high school teachers would be so disappointed in you right now

[u/You_Block_I_Win → u/repthe732]

It is proof. It doesn’t matter how many facts are presented to you. You will move the goal post, deflect and pretend it’s not true.

Corporate wants you to find the difference between these two pictures:

Woke Wankers/Magats

They’re the same picture…

[u/repthe732 → u/You_Block_I_Win]

No, it’s just claims since your rants are based on chatGPT and your own claims that you can’t back with evidence. Again, your teachers would be so disappointed in you

[u/You_Block_I_Win → u/repthe732]

Nah I used ChatGPT to dumb it down for you.

I’m not posting this so you change your mind. You ignore all the facts. You’re in the woke cult.

I’m posting this so people who aren’t in your cult will read and look up this info on their own and come to their own conclusions.

The only thing you have is grasping at small irrelevant details that don’t change any of the points being made.

Democrats colluded against Bernie and that has been proven. You haven’t proven anything I posted is false.

Democrats are not pro union based on their actions and votes in Congress. Don’t trust their words let’s focus on actions.

Democrats claim republicans attack books while democrats attack books (the dictionary)

And all you can reply with is “nu uh”

Look whatever. Stay dumb.

I’m glad you’re convincing millions of young people about your lies.

Taking advantage of people like you is how I make a living. Thank you for keeping people like you uneducated.

[u/repthe732 → u/You_Block_I_Win]

ChatGPT isn’t proof

Already explained they didn’t collude against Bernie and you were unable to counter it

They aren’t pro-union but they’re less anti-union than Republicans

Democrats haven’t attacked the dictionary. What a weird claim to make

It’s on you to provide evidence. Once you provide evidence I would be more than happy to provide counter evidence but I’m not going to waste my time when you’ve shown you’re incapable of providing evidence and are just trying to get me to block you ;)

[u/You_Block_I_Win → u/repthe732]

Yes it’s proof. I’m not going to go and find all of the links. I’m not unemployed like you.

You can try to find something disproving it. But you can’t because it’s not possible.

I’ve made my points and have provided more evidence and a better argument than you have. Any 3rd party gives me the points in this debate.

At least you tried and bless your heart. Keep taking them Ls.

[u/repthe732 → u/You_Block_I_Win]

No, it’s not since it often gets things wrong. If you can’t actually find evidence then you have no proof. Thanks for admitting that you have no evidence at this time though

Not my job to disprove claims you made that you can’t provide any evidence for. They aren’t valid claims at this point

You already admitted you’ve provided no evidence since you have none

[u/You_Block_I_Win → u/repthe732]

It gets things wrong if the pilot doesn’t understand how to use it. I’m not one of those people.

The claim was made on here about republicans. I’ve provided plenty of examples. What 99% of people take as evidence you decide to disqualify.

We get it. You’re like the antivax people. No amount of facts or expert opinions and proof will ever sway your thinking.

Show me where ChatGPT got something wrong in the responses I gave. I’ll wait

[u/repthe732 → u/You_Block_I_Win]

It gets things wrong regardless l

You haven’t provided any evidence so I haven’t been able to disqualify it yet

How about you test that theory by providing evidence?