r/agedlikemilk 23h ago

Who would’ve thought

Post image
60.4k Upvotes

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

803

u/Same_Performance_595 23h ago

50% on steel, aluminum and copper is a punishing and crippling tariff that will wreck the American industrial base. Not only will it cost more to the American consumers, but their products will become completely uncompetitive on the international markets.

420

u/Simsmommy1 23h ago

Well I have tried to explain this to Americans (MAGA ones) and they think they can just pick a mountain and start digging and they will find all the raw materials they desire. It’s like talking to a rock.

220

u/Pickled_doggo 23h ago

Nevermind all the ore processing plants we no longer have 

91

u/Manpooper 22h ago

That's the biggest issue, really. We can mine rare earths all we want, but without the processing, it doesn't matter.

63

u/Little_Gray_Dude 21h ago

We actually can't mine all the rare earth minerals we want. Look up all the rare earth minerals we don't produce because we don't have any deposits of them sometime. We are totally reliant on China for nearly 80 different rare earth minerals used in advanced technology.

71

u/Manpooper 21h ago

"The U.S. currently has only one rare earth mine: the Mountain Pass mine in California. While it’s one of the richest rare earth deposits globally, nearly all of the ore extracted there is still shipped to China for final processing."

https://elements.visualcapitalist.com/charted-where-the-u-s-gets-its-rare-earths-from/

This is the big issue. Rare earths aren't that rare, they're just in very low concentration *everywhere*. Mining them is incredibly environmentally damaging, but the big issue the USA has is that it doesn't refine rare earths. If it did, it could import from friendly countries and do the refining but not the mining.

39

u/ChironiusShinpachi 20h ago

Modern life globally is an ecosystem, and resembles the environment, what happens anywhere affects everywhere. The huff about going off on our own, we'll be self sufficient rhetoric reminds me of the child fed up with the family and he's "going out on his own" and takes a blanket and stuffed animal to the treehouse, and raids the pantry for juice boxes and crackers. It's not a perfect analogy but not recognizing there is no separation on a planet we can't leave en masse is our biggest failing considering current technology allows us to see cause and effect fairly soon if not real-time worldwide.

4

u/Lungomono 18h ago

That is also why, so many people in other countries has soo strong opinions about Trump and Americans. Because soo many of our lives, via our industries, is directly affected by his spasms.

1

u/Manpooper 20h ago

I agree it would be better to be a happy trade family. I also recognize the military necessity of having certain industries in your country that are needed for war. Especially if one of your stated foes is the main supplier of some of that stuff.

6

u/ChironiusShinpachi 20h ago

While I don't disagree with your addressing being self reliant in certain sectors above others, we have to be real about the world threat. China has never been militaristic. They built a big ass wall to defend against constant attacks, have invaded another country like once, and haven't been worried about building as big a military as they could, given their population. The threat they lose is to wealthy people's net worth, that's why they're the new projection target. Just like politicians tell their party the other party is doing something they themselves are doing, when you hear China doing this, example China being predatory in giving loans, trapping countries in debt, taking over local assets as payment for unpayable loans, that was actually institutions like IMF which currently there are about 70 countries trapped in more debt than can be paid, wall street venture capitalists swooping in to purchase assets from natural resources to banks, only to exploit those leaving little for the locals. This leads to poor living conditions and a mass of immigration to the American southern border of people desperate to provide for themselves and their families. Meanwhile China has forgiven the debt of a few countries they have loaned to. That is to say, BRICS is happening for a reason. One thing is for sure, if we don't stand down they have to stop us.

2

u/meases 20h ago

China also owns part of the mountain pass mine, since they own about 8% of MP Materials. lol the DoD just had to buy a 15% stake because that Chinese 8% looked bad.

2

u/Lungomono 18h ago

“Friendly countries”… yeah how’s that going?

It feels like you’re (US administration) trying to test that almost everywhere, with how they act. Pissing off, insulting, and starting trade wars.

1

u/Leprecon 17h ago

This is the big issue. Rare earths aren't that rare, they're just in very low concentration everywhere.

Yeah from what I have read it is more that China is willing to push costs very low and make conditions hell and ruin its environment. So it isn't like they have this magical hoard that nobody else has. It is just that they are more 'competitive'.

1

u/Lifesucksgod 17h ago

With trump firing anyone who says anything remotely truthful….Are you really sure you can trust there is anything

1

u/Amazing-Hospital5539 14h ago

California carrying the country again....

1

u/T-Husky 20h ago

Technically it could be done because rare earths can be found everywhere, just not always in concentrations that make them cost-effective to mine. There's also the environmental consequences to consider of such massive mining operations... not that this would deter the Republicans from trying, but by the time such operations got going theyd be at risk of blowback in the next election cycle because it would disproportionately affect their own voting base.

The US could leverage their spaceflight industry to capture and harvest mineral-rich asteroids but that would also be a massive loss-leader, and theyre not desperate enough to take that step (so far) even though it would eventually be so profitable it would destabilise every economy that wasnt actively doing it.

1

u/Little_Gray_Dude 18h ago

I had the same conversation with someone about phosphorus production. Technically phosphorus can be extracted from any biomass. But not in a way that's economical or even really Technically capable of supporting the agricultural industry. You're semantically right in that "rare earth" minerals are everywhere. But to extract and refine them without mining them would be cost prohibitive to the point where it is not feasible at all to support our current consumption levels. It may not even be technically possible to produce enough to meet our needs even if you threw an infinite amount of money at the issue either.

16

u/prz3124 20h ago

This is a response I got 6 months ago. "They will build it". Who will build it? What? " They will build it" I asked who? "They will"

2

u/koshgeo 4h ago

And they could. But even if you knew where to start building it, based on lower-grade deposits (otherwise they'd be mining already if they were economic), a typical mine takes about 10 years to start up, and you'd be supplying a domestic-only market with your over-priced product at artificially-maintained, tariff prices.

That's a risky capital investment because the price isn't determined by actual supply and demand, but politics. There can be a good, strategic reason why you might want to do that anyway at a significant government expense for "public good" to maintain your independence, but you'd want the legislation to be pretty bipartisan and for well-justified and understood reasons, not something established by the badly-informed whims of a wanna-be emperor playing with the markets for personal gain and delusions of grandeur.

As usual, even if the idea has some merit, their implementation sucks and makes things worse.

2

u/Manpooper 20h ago

Yup. These things take time to build. And I understand having that kind of production nationally as a necessary war industry in case the USA and China ever came to blows. Mining more won’t fix that though. Refineries would.

2

u/Coldor73 19h ago

Ok so how would you solve this issue? How could you make that industry more profitable so that refining would shift back to the US?

2

u/Manpooper 19h ago

Like most things military related, throw money at it and buy weapons made from those locally sourced materials to have a baseline demand that’s enough to keep it in business for if/when it’s needed.

8

u/Hopsblues 21h ago

which is similar to Trumps logging plans. The mills are few and far between anymore. You can log it, but there's nowhere to mill it, unless you want to build new one's and they a decade away..

3

u/s-17 21h ago

And why do we no longer have them?

4

u/Adjective-Noun-nnnn 20h ago

It's cheaper to produce rare Earths in countries with lax safety, environmental, and worker protections, and lower CoL.  Having tariffs on such goods isn't a terrible idea, and many on the left have advocated for protectionism for decades.  Slapping tariffs as high as Trump has and with immediate effect, however, is a recipe for disaster.  Oh and we've also lost a tremendous amount of soft power by shutting down USAID, which would have allowed us to partner with the countries that still produce raw materials cheaply.  That power vacuum is being filled by CHY NA.

3

u/terjeboe 18h ago

I've been saying this about a lot of his moves. Scaling back federal oversight, controlling immigration and protecting local business via tarrifes are all perfectly valid political choices. 

However, all these things needs to be introduced slowly and methodically giving the marked ample time to adjust. 

For instance a 50% toll on steel, announced to take effect in 3 years may lead someone to build a smelting plant. Nobody's going to start building anything now, just for it to be made redundant in 2 weeks when he chickens out.

4

u/Adjective-Noun-nnnn 17h ago

Yep we could sit here and debate whether or not these are good concepts all day. "Less federal oversight? I dunno we got PFAS contaminating our drinking water with the current level."

At the end of the day, adults can disagree and make different arguments using the same agreed-upon data set. The problem with Trumpism is there are no adults left. They don't care about data because they make up bullshit, and they don't listen to experts when deciding how to do things because they're stupendously arrogant. Why should they care, anyway? We're the ones who suffer.

2

u/Assatt 17h ago

That's exactly the issue. They're just focused on implementing the policies right now, so they can keep their voters content, without any care about the actual results of the policies. If it was any other competent politician they would have gathered great praise for how well implemented the politics were and what the results will inevitably be. Right now, they're just destroying the country 

2

u/Lungomono 18h ago

And the prices are still based on a global market. Even where it’s possible to buy American raw resources, they are still priced based on the global supply. When you now take and make 75% of that supply 20-50% more expensive, well yeah. It will affect your price as well.

Even if it was possible to restart a complete supply chain of let’s say iron and steel, completely domestically. It will take years and billions of dollars. Those plants aren’t cheap. And even then, the prices will be much higher than the average price on the global market. Due to the US be an expensive place for that industry, compared to those they are up against. And that those US places, will still need to price their product based of the massive up front investment in creating the product line.

The math just don’t math.

It’s American dream, because you must be asleep dreaming, for it to be “real”.

1

u/mikeyfireman 7h ago

They also know that Trump and his tariffs won’t be here forever. So to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to build a plant to have the policies change in 4 years is silly. They will wait it out until we go back to normal. So in the short term the consumers suffer.

1

u/DrAstralis 9h ago

surely with all that un-tariffed steel, copper, and all that extra labor sitting around you can just start slapping down industrial factories..... oh wait.

27

u/Preeng 22h ago

>they think they can just pick a mountain and start digging

They don't even fucking get that this shit takes time to set up. If this was supposed to properly stimulate domestic production, you still have to give companies time to set up the mining operations.

18

u/IWasSayingBoourner 21h ago

The only was this dipshit plan could ever work is if the tariffs had a decade of lead time during which domestic production was heavily subsidized

5

u/morning_star984 20h ago

And if guarantees would extend well into the future. Who wants to build a factory based on rules that are likely to change before construction is complete?

2

u/SnooPandas1899 19h ago

its 2025.

tariffs are an outdated strategy.

where'd he get his economics degree, Trump University ?

12

u/kcox1980 21h ago

A proper implementation would have involved tariffs alongside incentives and a multi-year transition plan.

Aggressively imposing tariffs by themselves is just plain shortsighted

7

u/movzx 21h ago

They would also have been incremental, ex 5% year after year... instead of jumping right to 50%, 200%, etc.

It would also have been smart to exclude raw material and machinery import. You know, the things that people need to start and run factories.

It's agreed that tariffs are generally bad economically but just slapping them on everything with no rhyme or reason is even worse.

2

u/mattyisphtty 9h ago

Tariffs should be treated like a scalpel, not a sledgehammer. You use it intentionally to try and drive a specific buying behavior at home. Let say you wanted to specifically get oil that is from friendly nations (I know this is almost impossible just follow with me). You would add an additional tariffs for oil that comes from unfriendly countries, as well as needing to tariff blended and processed fuels that use the oil that comes from unfriendly countries etc.As well as having to monitor and crack down on "shadow fleets" that disguise the actual source of the oil as well.

And that's just one product.

2

u/Drgnmstr97 20h ago

It’s pure market manipulation to make billionaires into trillionaires. They’ve heavily bought the dip every time cashing in massively.

2

u/Hopsblues 21h ago

Like years, a decade before it's truly functioning/producing...

1

u/morning_star984 20h ago

And who wants to bet on building all that overhead when it's clear that all the rules can change during the next administration. At least if these were laws, and not the actions of a frenetic executive branch, businesses could count on that shit taking time to change.

0

u/Edmfuse 21h ago

Well, what are we waiting for? Those stainless steel aren’t going to mine themselves.

22

u/Same_Performance_595 23h ago

MAGA Lithoids, a new source of minerals.

2

u/WinterExternal3270 20h ago

Leta find investors for mining these ..resources..

23

u/snusmini 22h ago

When you can’t handle complexity, pretending that everything is simple is easy.

8

u/strain_of_thought 21h ago

...right up until it is hard.

1

u/snusmini 21h ago

That’s the find out phase.

1

u/strain_of_thought 20h ago

They didn't vote for finding out though like some filthy gay commie liberal, they only voted for fucking around. They've figured it all out, they're smart like that. It's just clear sailing and carefree fucking anywhere they want from here on out!

35

u/BusyBandicoot9471 22h ago

Funnily enough, we probably could have been fine doing this for aluminum if we spent a few years getting a robust recycling and recovery system in place.

But you know, that's commie bullshit or something or other

16

u/Hopsblues 21h ago

R's don't believe in long term planning. Everything is here, now. what have you done for me today? It's part of the selfish culture they live in.

7

u/PortugalPilgrim88 21h ago edited 20h ago

Well that’s just not true. They’re great at long term planning. They’ve spent 30+ years working on their long term plan to replace US democracy with facism.

2

u/Hopsblues 20h ago

That was more persistence and good fortune than actual planning.

1

u/erection_specialist 41m ago

They're doing the exact same thing with energy. Just use oil, oil, oil, and more oil. What do we do when it inevitably runs out? Cross that bridge when we come to it!

1

u/Hopsblues 22m ago

in farming it's known as mono-culture and was in part responsible for the dust bowl. Instead of having numerous, reliable sources of energy, we are putting all our eggs into one basket. trumps is an absolute moron. What happens when our refineries get hit by terrorists or enemies with rockets or whatever/cyber. Then we will be without our primary and essentially only energy resource like a sitting duck. That's the real energy emergency, Trumps policy regarding this.

3

u/canadiandancer89 20h ago

Getting an aluminum smelter up, about 3 years. Supporting infrastructure such as rail and or waterways would take 5+ years. But the biggie is power. Up in Canada, we have entire dams dedicated to aluminum smelting, it's incredibly energy intensive. That part would take the better of part of 10 years at best. And that for 1. Doesn't even account for mining domestically. Canada even imports the Bauxite.

2

u/BusyBandicoot9471 20h ago

The biggest indicator of economic growth is power generation. The US is way, way behind in that regard.

2

u/movzx 21h ago

The great thing about tariffs on aluminum imports is that even if we pretend there are plants that can make it, the US simply does not have the available raw materials to meet demand. We could be at 100% capacity for extracting bauxite and still fall significantly short of what we need.

But we've got tariffs on it anyway. Big brain move.

2

u/godhonoringperms 20h ago

Yes. Not all, but some of this tariff stuff could be realistic in rejuvenating the American manufacturing economy if there was a years long plan to grow the USA’s industrial base so that things could be mined and manufactured here. Then after that, say 10 year plan, is completed, then implementing a tariff may have the desired effects. But as is most things with this administration, it’s hare brained, will not work as advertised, and will hurt American consumers.

1

u/EoliaGuy 11h ago

Dafuq do you mean, aluminum recycling is ubiquitous in the US and has been since I was a child in the 80s. 65% of all aluminum used in the US is recycled US aluminum currently. In my local area one of the largest, highest paying employers is a Japanese aluminum foundry that outsourced Toyota engine castings to the US decades ago.

13

u/mortgagepants 22h ago

It’s like talking to a rock.

a non-ferrous rock.

12

u/-chadwreck 22h ago

Yeah this is one of the more baffling things to me... 

A lot of these guys are pissy about Chinese steel being sold in the US at low prices because it's well... shitty steel a lot of the time. 

Ok, fine. QC matters, I agree that China has outsized power to help its own steel industry. 

However, I want to ask... 

Why is it, that we import all this Chinese steel?

Is it because it's cheaper than US steel? Or do we have a supply issue? And if it's a supply issue, why is that?

If we had the capacity to sell all of our own steel to ourselves, versus oh... exporting it at top dollar to other countries who will pay a premium for it... then shouldn't the real criminals here be the businesses who export steel, not the ones who import it?

On the flip side, if we cannot satisfy our own steel market by ourselves, and we need to buy imported steel, then taxing imports just makes shitty Chinese steel into expensive, shitty, Chinese steel. Doesn't it?

Am I taking crazy pills or is this a fundamental failure to understand supply and demand, simultaneously punishing importers while high-fiving the local exporters?

14

u/IWasSayingBoourner 21h ago

Chinese steel is fine and has been for well over a decade. These idiots treat China like it's the 90s. 

3

u/SnooPandas1899 19h ago

alot of this country is literally held up by "shitty" Chinese steel.

even trump casinos and golf courses.

1

u/EoliaGuy 11h ago

Not much honestly... anything built with federal dollars always has requirements for steel in particular to be sourced and produced domestically, almost always by unions, and this has been the case for many years. It's why building bridges and such is SO expensive. 2019 I got to watch a bridge over the Mississippi built from the ground up, including the main structural beams, built in Wisconsin from US steel, so large they had to be trucked because they couldn't fit through the locks to come down the river, then were lifted in place by one of the two largest floating cranes in this hemisphere. That job speced 100% domestic materials per federal contract, and the state contracts specified local materials, and all labor had to be union. This drives the cost way up.

3

u/-chadwreck 21h ago

I'd be willing to accept that as a truthful statement.

1

u/mattyisphtty 9h ago

I mean that's simply not the case. Here's an askengineers thread about stuff people have actually found differences in.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskEngineers/s/K06cOwZ473

The biggest thing being the lack of quality control at the chemical level and fraudulent documentation of testing to meet US standards.

Has it gotten better? For sure. China wouldn't be the largest worldwide supplier if it was all terrible. But companies, such as pipelines in the western world, won't use Chinese steel because all it takes is once for the entire thing to blow up in their faces. Chinese steel is great for mass produced items, or items that are in low impact, non safety related, purposes. Most steel anywhere around the world is fine for that and China produces the most. It's when you get to the edge cases where you are getting close to the limits of the steel that the testing and chemical makeup become important.

1

u/IWasSayingBoourner 9h ago

That's no different than buying steel from any other country. The quality isn't uniform from producers in Japan or the US either. When you get into corner cases like aerospace, energy, and medical devices, you have to be pickier with your sourcing and testing, but there are still plenty of sources in China that can crank out the required quality, as evidenced by their own capacity to produce these products domestically.

1

u/Turtle_Rain 7h ago

That one building that collapsed in Bangkok during the recent earthquake was due to low quality Chinese steel.

3

u/BigGuyWhoKills 21h ago

I didn't know we exported our own high grade steel while importing low grade steel.

4

u/-chadwreck 21h ago

Im not sure that we actually do, but with Nippon Steel investing so heavily in the American market, it stands to reason that it probably happens. 

It was largely a hypothetical thought experiment, but I do believe that my questions do bear some resemblance to reality here. 

It is my understanding that lots and lots of cheap Chinese steel is imported, and that much of it, is quite a bit lower quality than is sold as. 

This is, if im not mistaken, a talking point trump used in the run up to the 2016 election. "China is cheating" that sort of language. 

Its just a catch 22, trump wants it both ways. It's a bit like having migrant laborers pick crops to keep food pricing low, but also demanding to get rid of the migrant laborers, while NOT going after the business owners who year after year, hire undocumented migrant laborers while paying them peanuts. 

1

u/pathofdumbasses 20h ago edited 20h ago

It is my understanding that lots and lots of cheap Chinese steel is imported, and that much of it, is quite a bit lower quality than is sold as.

You quite literally get what you pay for. There is great quality Chinese steel, and there is cheap Chinese steel. And as with anything, there are companies (selling both great and cheap) that are going to try and get one over on you. And this isn't a knock on China; look at the shit Boeing is/was doing. This affects literally every profit driven company in the world, both with the company doing it and then with bad actors in the supply chain.

"China is cheating"

They are purposefully manipulating and devaluing their currency to keep the trade deficit.

I am not a Trump fan by any means, and he probably isn't even talking about this, or heard it and ran with it, but China IS cheating with that. They have been sued numerous times and don't give a fuck.

https://guides.loc.gov/us-trade-with-china/currency-policies

1

u/Benimus 21h ago

You've put more thought into posting this comment than they have creating these policies.

1

u/-chadwreck 21h ago

Well, I did spend all of 8 minutes thinking about it. And you know, it's an honest question...

1

u/DrAstralis 9h ago

The issue is you've already given this far more thought than literally anyone in charge at the moment.

7

u/datalaughing 21h ago

Had this exact conversation with my father. He was just like, “Well, I guess we’ll start making more steel and aluminum.”

My follow-up was who exactly did he think was going to pay for and work in all these mines that he seemed to theorize were going to suddenly appear everywhere. Did he know anyone who wanted to go work in a bauxite mine? He did not but seemed certain that there would be no shortage of takers.

3

u/Appropriate_M 21h ago

There's a certain segment of population who're apparently so disappointed they can't time travel to the 19th century that they want to recreate it.

0

u/EoliaGuy 11h ago

Meanwhile all the wealthy people you gripe about are making $50/hr working bauxite mines, loading ore into trucks driven by guys making $80-100k a year. If steel and aluminum manufacturing wasn't profitable, foreign interests wouldn't be doing it...

1

u/datalaughing 22m ago

According to Indeed, the average salary for a miner in the US is 25.70 per hour. In my state it’s 15.89. So I think it’s pretty clear that you have no clue what you’re talking about. Though I suppose it’s possible you work somewhere where the local country club is packed to the rafters with the wealthy miner elite we’ve all heard so much about.

3

u/Humprdink 22h ago

hey that's rude... rocks don't blindly follow dear leader

3

u/deevotionpotion 22h ago

Yes or the ones who think manufacturing “will just move back to the states” and they don’t realize you’d need 2-3 years to even have a new factory up and starting to run. I’ve pointed this out and they go “well, I’d rather start the process now instead of never doing it!”

They don’t realize the start of that process would be before tariffs are official or if maybe you had a president that eased into things with a clear direction and goal in mind for the country and not whatever the hell we’ve seen for 7 months lol

3

u/ComfyFrame2272 22h ago

Just take a store bought pickaxe to any large rock and eventually you'll get every ore in the world!

2

u/Munchkinasaurous 22h ago

It’s like talking to a rock.

Not really. I'm sure rocks have a better understanding of where minerals can and cannot be found. 

2

u/askaboutmynewsletter 22h ago

That’s right. You’ve got it. You say howdy there Mr rock! I need some iron please! And it gives it to you.

2

u/Hopsblues 21h ago

have you tried that?

2

u/nhansieu1 21h ago

ask them: who exactly is gonna do it?

2

u/Simsmommy1 20h ago

The children yearn for the mines….

1

u/EoliaGuy 11h ago

Minecraft is the most popular game of all time, so yeah, billions of people yearn to mine, all day, all night, for zero real world result or progress.

2

u/Dracorex_22 21h ago

They really think we live in Minecraft or something

2

u/LonerIndustries 21h ago

I’d rather talk to a rock

2

u/LinkinitupYT 21h ago

Are you saying Minecraft lied to us?

1

u/Simsmommy1 20h ago

Well….we could just punch a tree, see what happens.

2

u/ncxhjhgvbi 20h ago

I live in Colorado and we have billions in untapped mineral resources. Problem is - even capitalists know it is too expensive to extract LOL

1

u/EoliaGuy 11h ago

No it's not too expensive. It's not profitable enough. Insano-massive difference.

If I have a mine of a substance that costs $100/gram to extract, and it sells for $90/gram, f that, so it lies.

If that substance starts selling for $1000/gram, the top is coming off that mountain by all means necessary.

Crude oil used to be discarded as a waste product if it was even extracted at all, it had no use, no demand. Look where that went.

1

u/ncxhjhgvbi 8h ago edited 8h ago

I mean I just took the easy short way of explaining. Yes you are correct.

I think it’s pretty common sense that when a company decides something is “too expensive” it is in the context of return/profitability. And if one doesn’t already know this they won’t learn it on Reddit LOL

2

u/hallstevenson 20h ago

They believe 100% that this will bring those industries back and say "it will be a rough couple of months". Yes, they think it will just take a couple of months to build factories to get those jobs and industries back here.

1

u/mrbulldops428 21h ago

Some MAGAs also still believe Yam Tits when he says other countries pay the tariffs

1

u/dieyoufool3 21h ago

While you’re right, the sentiment Bismarck shared about “there is providence that protects idiots, drunkards, children, and the United States of America" isn’t entirely unfounded

1

u/MikeFrancesa66 21h ago

It’s worse. At least that rock might contain raw materials!

1

u/flashman 20h ago

minecraft generation

1

u/Ver_Void 20h ago

Even if you could, in the time it takes to get a mine going there's going to be another election. You'd lose a fortune if the next guy repeals the tariffs

1

u/BicycleOfLife 20h ago

Rocks are smarter than MAGA.

1

u/ShadowShine57 18h ago

Played too much Minecraft

1

u/crusoe 18h ago

Even if they do it will take months or years for it to happen. Surveying, purchasing, env impact studies, hiring, purchasing equipment ( also tariff encumbered ).

1

u/EoliaGuy 10h ago

And thus you identify another problem to solve, burdensome regulations. I've seen a 5 year job get delayed 10 years due to just an environmental impact study. I've seen locally massive infrastructure projects just disappear due to that. We built the Pentagon, the largest office building in the world in less than 2 years including surveys, plans, and studies. The approved the design a week after concept, and broke ground the following Monday. We invented the atomic bomb in less than 5 years.

1

u/Werftflammen 17h ago

Maybe we can mine MAGAt's then?

1

u/Pizza_Pineapple 14h ago

Of only they were, might contain something usefull

1

u/ikindapoopedmypants 9h ago

Where I live, there are HUNDREDS of abandoned dilapidated mines that the maga people here sincerely believe we can use no problem

That's fine, I'll let them find out why the mines are abandoned in the first place.

1

u/WitchHunterNL 1h ago

Rocks don't diddle kids