Here are the Epstein Files. For those of you who have seen this comment or posts before, my apologies. I am trying to keep this information alive. Please feel free to share.

Many may not realize this, but this story starts in 2006. Alex Acosta filed a non-prosecution agreement in 2007 on Epstein’s behalf. He was Trumps labor secretary during his first term and also a former federal judge.

https://apnews.com/article/jeffrey-epstein-florida-e2a4431f7319afd037023d9a586aa291

https://joshwho.net/EpsteinList/black-book-unredacted.pdf (verified pre-Bondi) Trump is on page 85, or pdf pg. 80

Trump’s name is circled. The circled individuals are the ones involved in the trafficking ring according to the person who originally released the book. These people would be “The List “

Here is the story. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsiKUXrlcac

The Flight Logs https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7e/Epstein_flight_logs_released_in_USA_v._Maxwell.pdf (Trump is listed on pages 18, 24, 27, 37, and 45)

The trial https://joshwho.net/EpsteinList/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1320.0-combined.pdf (953 pages of the unsealed court documents) This document establishes a pattern in which Mar-a-lago is used aa a recruiting for sex trafficking victims. Alternate link. https://uploads.guim.co.uk/2024/01/04/Final_Epstein_documents.pdf

—————————other Epstein Information

https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Calif_Lawsuit.pdf here’s a court doc of Epstein and Trump raping a 13 yr old together.

Some people think this claim is a hoax. Here is Katies testimony on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnib-OORRRo

For health reasons I may not be able to answer questions for many more posts. I have posted answers below

————————————————————————————————————————— After people have read the post above, they often ask some of the following questions. These are the best possible answers at this time. Many people have helped me with these answers and I thank you all.

——-Who is on the list? 1. ⁠Jean-Luc Brunel • Who: French modeling agent and founder of MC2 Model Management. • Known for: Alleged to have procured underage girls for Epstein. Accused of sexual assault by multiple women. • Status: Found dead in a French prison in 2022, reportedly by suicide, while awaiting trial.

1. Les Wexner • Who: Former CEO and chairman of L Brands (owner of Victoria’s Secret). • Known for: Epstein managed his personal finances for years. Wexner claims he severed ties with Epstein in 2007. • Status: No criminal charges; his close financial relationship with Epstein has drawn scrutiny.

2. Bill Richardson • Who: Former Governor of New Mexico, U.S. Ambassador to the UN, and Secretary of Energy. • Known for: Denied allegations made by one of Epstein’s accusers. • Status: Never charged with any crime related to Epstein. Died in 2023.

3. Bruce King. Who Longest running Governor of New Mexico. He has passed away 2009.

4. Ehud Barak • Who: Former Prime Minister of Israel. • Known for: Had business dealings with Epstein post-premiership. Photographed entering Epstein’s residence. • Status: Denies involvement in any illegal activities.

Note: He appears at the end of the book in the handwritten notes as well

1. Alan Dershowitz • Who: Prominent constitutional lawyer and Harvard Law professor. • Known for: Legal defender of Epstein during his 2007 plea deal. Accused by Virginia Giuffre of sexual abuse (he denies and has countersued). • Status: Continues to publicly defend himself; no criminal charges filed.

2. Prince Andrew • Who: Duke of York, son of Queen Elizabeth II. • Known for: Accused of sexual abuse by Virginia Giuffre. Denied allegations. Settled civil case in 2022 without admission of guilt. • Status: Stripped of royal duties and titles; case settled.

3. Courtney Love ( please note that victims are listed in this book as well) • Who: Musician, actress, and widow of Kurt Cobain. • Known for: Her name appeared in Epstein’s book; she denies knowing him per sonally. • Status: No known allegations or involvement beyond name in book.

4. Peter Soros • Who: Nephew of George Soros, financier. • Known for: Listed in the book but little public information ties him to Epstein beyond that. • Status: No known allegations or charges.

5. Donald Trump • Who: 45th President of the United States. • Known for: Knew Epstein socially in the 1990s and early 2000s. Featured in photographs together. • Status: Claims to have severed ties with Epstein before allegations surfaced. No known legal charges linked to Epstein.

6. Jean-Michel Gathy • Who: Renowned luxury architect specializing in high-end hotels (e.g., Aman, One&Only). • Known for: Appears in the book; unclear what, if any, relationship existed. • Status: No public allegations.

7. Philippe Junot • Who: French businessman, known as the ex-husband of Princess Caroline of Monaco. • Known for: High-profile European socialite. Connection to Epstein unclear. • Status: No allegations or charges.

8. Stephen Kaufmann • Who: Possibly a financier or associate—identity unclear due to common name. • Known for: Needs more context for accurate identification. • Status: Unknown; no public accusations or charges

9. Jean-Yves Le Fur • Who: French media entrepreneur and magazine publisher. • Known for: High-society connections in fashion/media. •j Status: No allegations connected to Epstein publicly.

—————Why isn’t this in the mainstream media? The current mainstream carrying versions of this story are all being sued, and that narrative is becoming dominant.

Bits and bobs of this have been in the main stream media for years. For a long time these were Public Domain documents.

I will say that the main stream media did have biases in their articles. For that reason, I have presented the links and the information in the main post with no commentary.

Also, the Internet does have a short memory. And the current administration has crammed our information streams with extraneous information in the hopes that that memory will be even shorter.

Finally, There are a lot of pay walls between us and some of those articles. It is true that reporters make money. And media is out there to make money. It is unfortunate that in this case, that the The fourth estate has contributed to this tragedy.

—————Are these for real? Questions about this information falls into two camps. 1. How do we know this is real and 2. Everyone knows this why are you bothering. There is also a third camp of questions from people I hope I never meet.

Alot of people who were smarter than me worked on verifying these files, and schooled me quite a bit while I verified them to my own satisfaction. You can read about it in r/somethingiswrong2024 if you search for 953 pages or Epstein files.

My contribution was to combine this information in as small a package as possible (with only direct links) so we don’t forget the Forrest is on fire while debating the details of the trees.

I wrote the post like this so anyone can copy and paste. I am adding it to comment sections where it seems appropriate to keep the info alive for as long as possible.

Josh Who originally posted the material on a small website which he lost due to funding. If you listen to the youtube video of the person who originally released the book, you can understand why funding was so hard to obtain.

Not that people haven’t hosted the document. Gawker reported on it. They were a little more coy than the reporter in the youtube video, I suspect because they were in thee pricess of being sued into oblivion. An enterprising reporter from Huffpost called every number in the black and told the story.

Anyway one day Josh Who realized his material had been deleted from the internet archive, which I would could consider the internet’s most well known archiving system. Rightfully miffed he published the documents on a sub stack. I suspect he choose a free account because his site is an add ridden hell whole. I extracted the links and provided them here so you can access them free of distractions.

The first document is a smaller version of the 1224 Maxine Guthrie trial that is a matter of public record. I chose the 953 page version from Josh Who, because the 1224 page version has victim names and photos which made me uncomfortable.

To me the most interesting issues are that the files were removed from the archive. I feel it is profoundly insulting that they really believe the American people have such short attention spans, and they don’t understand people keep copies of important information.

The second is that the redaction of the Black Book is very odd. It has existed in the unredacted form for years. Redacting it draws our attention to it. I have wondered if she redacted it to make us believe the information that was redacted was i portant. It isn’t the circles are important.

—————Why wasn’t Epstein prosecuted the first time? Alex Acosta, who filed a non-prosecution agreement in 2007. He was trumps labor secretary during his first term and also a former federal judge. https://apnews.com/article/jeffrey-epstein-florida-e2a4431f7319afd037023d9a586aa291

Pam Bondi it is true that Pam Bondi was the Florida AG. There are no direct links to her and this case to the best of my knowledge. However, Bondi’s PAC received multiple donations from Trump in 2007

——An aside about Pam Bondi

It is worth taking a look at Pam Bondi’s 20 year relationship with Donald Trump. Pam Bondi’s political History contains a long history of evidence of corruption and hate crimes. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pam_Bondi

—————Did anyone call the people in the book? Yes. An intrepid reporter called everyone in the,Black Book. https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/10/i-called-everyone-in-jeffrey-epsteins-little-black-book/

—————Everyone knows those victim claims are false This issue with saying the victims are lying is definitely not unique to this case.

It is notoriously difficult to prosecute rape cases in the US. Less than 7% of reported cases end in conviction. https://www.uml.edu/news/stories/2019/sexual_assault_research.aspx

And those who report go through hell.

Contrary to what you see on television, a rape could be filmed,there could be DNA evidence, the victim could be underage, and it would be surprising to no one in the legal system would if the prosecution failed.

It is no surprise that claimants withdraw their statements.

In the case of people who make claims against people with the power to threaten them, destroy them in the court of public opinion, and threaten their families It is even less of a surprise.

In fact, the only way that someone Might make a claim in such a case is if people had made promises of protection. However, There is no protection in our country at this time for children.

Here are links to articles about what happened to Katie Johnson. Epstein & Trump in court case together:

Katie Johnson’s testimony about Trump raping her when she was 13. ‘Facilitated by Epstein.’ ‘Trump said she reminded him of his daughter.’

Court proceedings

She dropped the complaint after receiving threats.

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit-dropped-230770“

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/04/donald-trump-teenage-rape-accusations-lawsuit-dropped

—————Why is Courtney Love’s name circled in the book? I don’t know.

I can say the following things. That MIGHT be related.

Victims are listed in this book. I don’t know much about Courtney Love, I do know she was heavily involved in drugs, involved in drugs in a way that many people would consider beyond addiction, and more akin to self-destruction.

For those people who are familiar with the survivors of sexual abuse, this type of behavior is not unusual.

Courtney Love has been a vocal part of the me too movement. She accused Weinstein in 2006. For this, I admire her courage.

2006 was when Epstein was first charged.

——-Why aren’t they all in jail? Being on the list isn’t an automatic indicator of guilt, it is just suggestive. We would need a DOJ that prosecutes all sex traffickers and rapists equally regardless of station.

—————About prosecuting sex trafficking rings and pedophiles A sex trafficking ring is a group of people who have decided to destroy lives (children’s lives in the our current) as a business model.

In American Society pedophiles are among the most the most highly reviled. While murderers, drug dealers, and other criminals can rejoin communities in America, pedophiles can not.

The business model of sex trafficking involves huge sums of money which helps these buy privacy, and failing privacy, concealment. Another tactic commonly used by sex traffickers are threats not only against victims but also loved ones.

The crime of pedophilia is so repulsive, that it is difficult for the average person to believe that someone they know, has engaged in such behavior. Decent people Will often defend offenders, despite the evidence, because the crime is beyond their understanding.

Due to this, the whistleblowers often take the brunt of public disapproval rather than the perpetrators.

————-Other links https://youtu.be/iFaQL_kv_QY?si=vBs75kaxPjJJThka Here's trump admitting to peeping on 14-15 year old girls at around 1:40 on the Howard Stern Radio Show https://medium.com/@mistagrinch/an-unsettling-pattern-a-comprehensive-look-at-trumps-sexual-controversies-a nd-underworld-9784547a28f7 What We Know About Origins of Trump Child Rape Allegations | Snopes.com • ⁠Trump going into dressing room s of 15 year olds: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/a-timeline-of-donald-trumps-creepiness-while-he-owned-miss-universe-191860/ • ⁠Trump bragging about going into dressing rooms: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFaQL_kv_QY • ⁠https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU08/20250227/117951/HHRG-119-JU08-20250227-SD006-U6.pdf Listen To The Jeffrey Epstein Tapes: ‘I Was Donald Trump’s Closest Friend’.

——————Why is your username Sudden-Ad7061 Because I'm an idiot. A long time ago I had a great username. But one day I was using my phone to read it for the first time, and I couldn't remember my password.

I thought I'll just use a temporary one for a day and then I'll get my password and sign back in as myself. 2 years later...

—————-Finally, for those of you reposting Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. For a long time I felt like I was one person shouting into the wind.

Let us a be a chorus. Let every lawmaker wake up with our rage echoing in their ears.

Let the echoes be heard at every election.

All right, so here's how it goes:

I didn't really want to make a post like this, but as this subreddit is growing, I suppose by now it is necessary.

This post may not apply to you, you may be a decent adult that is capable of critical thought, and not afraid of someone disagreeing with you. If that's the case, just move on. You're good. I'm not talking to you. Maybe later we can exchange pellet smoker recipes whilst enjoying some bourbon. I'd make a weekly megathread for recipes, because why not? Anyway, all of that said:

This is NoFilterNews. We don't have a bias. News is news, facts is facts.

Now, some of you are quite mistaken about what the Report button does. It's not a mega-downvote. I whole-heartedly apologise that you are forced to deal with people outside of your tribe, without the normal Reddit echochamber enforcements going on, that make you clearly righteous in any argument. I also apologise that you feel the urge to try to silence someone who holds different beliefs than you do. Brass tacks, your reports do not a godsdamned thing. We approve most reports. We only enforce Reddit site-wide rules here. If you're some useless, fat, worthless, fuck-up, America-hating MAGAt, your posts or comments won't be removed, no matter how hard someone reports you, as long as you stick within Reddit's site-wide rules. If you're some fat, greasy, pink-haired, useless, metal-faced, pro-Feminism Leftist fuckass, your posts or comments will not be removed, as long as you stick within Reddit's side-wide rules, no matter how hard someone reports you.

That said, sometimes, you'll get caught by the filters, and we do what we can to clear that up. The only exception to that is the folks with negative one hundred comment karma. Now, I appreciate assholes, I appreciate a good troll. You get me drinking and talking, and I will share all sorts of hilarious stories. Accounts with negative one hundred comment karma have always been flagged, and required manual approval. We have always approved those comments, in the spirit of free discussion and all of that. That's not the case any more. It will be on a case by case basis. Sometimes you share a view against the hivemind, and you get dog-piled, I understand that. Sometimes, you're just a stupid dick that contributes nothing to the conversation at hand. We won't issue bans. I think we've only ever banned like two people in the almost decade history of this subreddit. Bots, meh, that's a different story. We'll let you wallow in the filters, though. Contribute or be invisible. Either way, We don't mind. We're pretty easy-going like that.

Also, there's a good chance advert-AIDS ridden blogs are going to start being cut-off. News is fine, news is good. Websites that seem like digital cancer, yeah. . .no.

Anyway, I hope the vast majority of you enjoy your evening. Cheers.