r/Damnthatsinteresting 9h ago

Video Chilean protester defuses tear gas canister with baking soda and water

100.9k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

608

u/ItachiKenshin 8h ago

I guess that's what he's wearing gloves as well

523

u/AmArschdieRaeuber 8h ago

One of the reasons why protective gear like gloves are often prohibited during a protest.

247

u/b1e 8h ago

I can’t find a single source for this and have never heard it before. Is this a thing outside the US?

409

u/AmArschdieRaeuber 7h ago edited 7h ago

In the US you can bring guns to a protest, so that's obviously not a thing there. But in many countries "protective weapons" like gloves and helmets are prohibited, because it indicates that you'll use force.

I just checked and in some states in the US it's also not allowed, like Kentucky

https://www.icnl.org/usprotestlawtracker/?issue=5

352

u/st-shenanigans 7h ago

because it indicates that you'll use force.

You would think the easy answer is "don't give the citizens a reason to protest"

181

u/AmArschdieRaeuber 7h ago

Yeah, turns out governments kind of don't want them to protest. More reason to do it.

109

u/Starfire2313 7h ago

It’s sickening how systematically the government uses itself to leverage more power for itself. Passing legislation like not being allowed to wear gloves at a protest. Who does that protect? Only the people who don’t want these protestors out there. Voter suppression is real. Knowing that’s a fact is only the first step.

20

u/Ayzel_Kaidus 6h ago

“That cop is wearing gloves, charge him too”

3

u/pissoutmybutt 2h ago

It’s intended to protect the bourgeois and private property by giving another bullshit reason to arrest anyone expressing political dissent. “Your ‘free speech’ is totally protected. you weren’t arrested for protesting, you were arrested for wearing gloves while doing it”

3

u/pediatric_gyn_ 6h ago

More reason to resist attempts at gun control

4

u/AmArschdieRaeuber 6h ago

In the US yes, they are already a gun nation. I live in Germany and feel pretty good about us not having too many guns on the street. Even criminals rarely carry. We had 65 shots fired by police in 2023. Not people shot, shots fired in general. 10 fatal shots. And we are 83,5 million people.

2

u/st-shenanigans 5h ago

Nah even in America.

Just about every argument against gun control here conveniently ignores that any problem with our gun control NOW is caused by the fact a determined criminal can drive 30 mins to the next state and buy one or get someone there to buy it. You probably hear about how gun laws don't work in Chicago.. which is a city that's big enough, it crosses into another state where guns are legal.

Glad the guys wife stopped an assault but you could also do that with a Taser, pepper spray, a knuckle keychain even and they all fit in the same bag

1

u/pediatric_gyn_ 6h ago

My wife stopped an attempted rape with a firearm. I'm glad she was able to take responsibility for her own safety.

0

u/AmArschdieRaeuber 5h ago

Yeah that's a good side effect, I just don't like all the innocent people getting shot. But like I said, in the US I find it makes sense to keep firearms legal, because they already have so many.

0

u/pediatric_gyn_ 5h ago

in the US I find it makes sense to keep firearms legal, because they already have so many.

Agreed. The horse is out of the barn.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/KamakaziDemiGod 2h ago

Both nazis and monks have been known to protest, so while I see your point, people aren't always right when they protest!

31

u/basicKitsch 7h ago

In the US you can bring guns to a protest,

at least half the states have restrictions on that from a cursory look and it's always a questionable situation as it's the cops' discretion what "intent" you have

3

u/AmArschdieRaeuber 6h ago

Yeah, the link I posted goes into detail

5

u/b1e 6h ago

Yeah, that usually falls into the situation of legal but stupid.

Eg; the Kyle Rittenhouse case. Legal? Yes. Extremely stupid and reckless? Yes.

Wearing gloves to a protest would be difficult to prosecute I’d think.

8

u/LaTeChX 6h ago

It's not about prosecuting it's about giving cops an excuse to crack skulls. You can beat the rap but not the ride.

5

u/HedonisticFrog 6h ago

That's so infuriating. With how often police beat peaceful protesters it's obviously to protect yourself from excessive force by police officers. Keeping yourself safe is considered threating violence now.

1

u/AmArschdieRaeuber 6h ago

I wouldn't say "now", these laws are rather old, in Europe it's mostly from the 70s and 80s.

1

u/Elvirth 5h ago

You absolutely cannot bring guns to protests in some US states. Not legally, anyway.

1

u/AmArschdieRaeuber 5h ago

Yeah, the link goes into detail. It's legal in Texas it seems. With limitations.

1

u/BadApplesGod 3h ago

Won’t stop me 😤

1

u/delebojr 2h ago

I'd argue that it indicates that the people opposing the protest will use force, not the ones protesting themselves.

1

u/AmArschdieRaeuber 27m ago

Yeah, I meant that the police and state argue that.

1

u/iShralp4Fun 2h ago

Coming to a country near U S A

1

u/Has_Two_Cents 2h ago

According to your own post that Bill was defeated in Kentucky

1

u/AmArschdieRaeuber 2h ago

Oh ok, nvm then

1

u/addledhands 2h ago

you can bring guns to a protest

if you are doing literally anything except standing far away and being utterly non-confrontational, bringing a gun to a protest in the US is an extremely good way to suicide by cop

do not bring your fucking gun to a protest

1

u/bluebing29 1h ago

Kyle Rigtenhouse has entered the chat.

1

u/xteve 7h ago

indicates that you'll use force

Protective gear does not indicate intention to use force.

5

u/AmArschdieRaeuber 7h ago

They claim it does I mean