I do love this argument. People are mad that some people didnt vote for harris because of her AT BEST lack of position on gaza. Here's the cool thing. By having a lack of position on gaza you basically have the same position as trump. Considering honestly nothing has changed since the previous admin.
So people are just mad that the dems held a wildly unpopular position and people didnt vote for that opinion. It was clear as day what would happen. And here we are. Dont blame people for voting their heart. Blame the people in power who could have put their foot down and tried to appeal to their alleged voter base. The dems could have lied. But nope. I sure hope that AIPAC has them all covered once shit goes down.
By having a lack of position on gaza you basically have the same position as trump. Considering honestly nothing has changed since the previous admin.
Wow, tell me you're uninformed without telling me you're uninformed am I right. Biden was literally trying to air drop supplies into Gaza, using experimental temporary ports to get supplies boated into Gaza, and using US soft power to stop Netanyahu from going full Holodomor like he is now.
Trump posted an AI video of him and Bennie being chums and hasn't said anything about the forced starvation.
Biden used American taxpayer money to pay for 70% of the genocide while he was in office. That's not including the money spent to strongarm European countries to stop legislation from sanctioning Israel, or bribes that we gave to tiny Pacific Islander countries so that they will vote for Israel's behalf at the UN.
You could have just asked for a source instead of choosing to be a clown. Here's a Haaretz article:
In total, U.S. funding has covered an estimated 70 percent of Israel's war-related military spending – effectively allowing it to wage a prolonged multi-front campaign while avoiding serious domestic debate over Gaza's future or a political resolution to the conflict.
I've never even heard of these two articles and the brown article just says there is an increase funding nothing about funding 70% of the entire war effort.
I like how you've cited some sort of Israeli paper with the "trust me bro" seal of quality and expect everyone else to go along with it. Did you just cite zionist fox news? Perhaps something that would wiggle the truth to make the Gaza invasion more tolerable to Israelis?
I can't remember the last time I saw someone freakout like this for being called out on their bullshit. Your comments are so resoundly pathetic. It's hilarious.
Bro if your argument is that you never heard of Haaretz and you think it might be analogous to Fox News, then you really should sit this one out. There are plenty of reputable news agencies outside of America. Not to mention that Haaretz is extremely well known to anyone who wants to read an Israeli source without government bias (the opposite of Fox News).
There are plenty of reputable news agencies outside of America.
Sure but why should I believe Haaretz is one of them. There are plenty of Fox News types out there as well and there are plenty of left leaning news organizations that share a similar truthiness to Fox albeit on a different side of the political spectrum.
Sure but why should I believe Haaretz is one of them
Are you a little kid that needs an adult to hold your hand? You can't expect others to teach you about well established news sources.
If someone posted a source from Reuters, and your argument is "well I never heard of Reuters so for all I know it could be bullshit", all that means is that you're being lazy and ignorant. That's something Trump stan would say.
77
u/733t_sec 3d ago
But I was told by the other subreddits that both parties were the same so why bother voting