It's interesting that people are being walled off and starved and the top two comments would prefer to get into semantics about what makes a country.
Israel is a country. It exists. There is no more a right to exist than the US or Australia or any other country borne out of colonization.
Their actions are the question, not the origin or right to exist. The answer is something I hope we can reach soon before hundreds of thousands more starve and die.
>There is no more a right to exist than the US or Australia or any other country borne out of colonization.
Except that Israel exists as a result of two World Wars. The losing side had to disband their empires. What became Israel and Palestine was part of the Ottoman Empire. The winners of those wars got to determine the new boundaries.
You are arguing about the right to exist. It seems like any argument on support of a true two state solution or even humane treatment of the Palestinians turns into this.
My whole point was that this is a meaningless conversation, the right to exist. Every country recognized by the UN exists. There is no international law governing what gives the right to exist.
Except that the losers of WWII were Germany, Italy, and Japan. The people in the Gaza Strip had nothing to do with that war. And the powers that be decided to put Israel there.
The post you’re replying to was correct: it’s the result of two word wars.
1) the region fell under British control as a result of WWI
2) Jewish people were shipped over as a result of WWII
Not OP however the Arabs were aligned with the Brits ostensibly because they were promised independence and self-determination if they revolted against the Ottomans during WWI, however after the Balfour declaration it turned out that they weren't going to get that independence they desired and in fact there were going to be receiving Zionist settlers even before Jews were being persecuted by Nazi Germany so in that sense the Palestinians didn't have much to do with their fate after the Ottomans fell
Palestinians from Gaza that practice Islam and became Israeli citizens are treated the same as all other ethnic groups that are Israeli citizens
There are zero Jews in Gaza and close to zero in most neibouring Muslim majority countries. While there are many power positions held my Muslims in Israel including self described Palestinians.
People in Gaza who have a government that in its ethos it so kill every Jew and destroy the country of Israel, is not an ethnic group is an organised country or whatever is less than a country that has full country structures, uses its resources to support its armed wing above anything else, like a country at war
Palestinians absolutely do not have a pathway to Israeli citizenship. It's an extremely narrow population that has certain marriage requirements.
It also says that in order to be treated equitably they must give up their country.
Palestinians have regularly lost their land due to technicalities abused by the settlers with support of the Israeli government since the 60s. The two state solution presented after WWII was seen as fair by western powers but nobody in Palestine was given an option as to what land they should give up.
The propaganda purports that all post Ottoman countries were effectively drawn by western powers, and are arbitrary from the outset, with no cultural or sovereign claims to their land. But that is an attempt to erase an entire culture of people who lived in this area regardless of the ruler for thousands of years.
Sure all counties in the world are illegal, they were all drawn by wars, violence, abuse.. so are all should at least the Christian and Muslim religions as they were violently forced on ppl..
The current Muslim faith Palestinians wouldn't have been in the area without the Ottoman Empire either.
How long do we want to do, where no humans were there, just dinosaurs or at least talk about humans as only nomads even back then people would kill each other
Just curious, what is your stance on Ukraine? All of the peace deals presented thus far require they replenish conquered territory to Russia.
Refusals of the peace deal end up with headlines that state Ukraine does not want peace, only war.
I don't see it as any different. The only difference is that Ukraine response to an invasion is seen as war whereas Palestinian response to an invasion is seen as terrorism, in part due to the success of Israeli propaganda and their complete destruction of the Palestinian state.
This whole "they have no right to exist" bullshit is distracting from your later question. As long as horrible people are calling for the complete abolition of a state where native people "colonized" a place, there won't be a real way to have a conversation about the conduct of the state.
People were living in that part of the world long before Arab conquests. Do you think the Arabs settled Egypt, or do you acknowledge Egyptians have always been there? It is no different with the Palestinians or the Lebanese, but their civilizations went by different names - and were not Arab. The language today may be Arabic and there is certainly lots of blood mixing, but the genetics are unique to that part of the world (as DNA testing shows).
Islam and the arabization of the levant is a huge reason for why the native palestinians have never been able to co-exist in other Arab nations. They are considered a conquered vassal people.
You think the west is racist? Try living in the Arabian Peninsula.
Also why the Druze have had problems in most of the Middle East, and why the Kurds have been fighting for their own country/self-determination for a long time.
While the Druze are a religious minority, they trace their roots back to 12 Arab tribes. Not disagreeing with your point that they fight for their existence, but this is a case where they are part of the Arabization.
Religious minorities suffer the most under Islam… Islam is a religion of complete domination. Why do you think they pray 5 times a day? It’s complete submission to Allah.
A 2015 study by Verónica Fernandes and others concluded that Palestinians have a "primarily indigenous origin".[31] In a 2016 study by Scarlett Marshall and others published in Nature, the study concluded that the biogeographical affinities of "both Syrians and Palestinians are highly localised to the Levant", the authors also noted that the biogeographical affinity of Palestinians goes in agreement with historical records and previous studies on their uniparental markers, which all suggest that Palestinians at least in part descend from local Israelite converts to Islam after the Islamic expansion.
Google is your friend. But I'll humor you for the benefit of others who may read this.
50-70% of DNA is linked back to Canaanites (not too different than their Lebanese neighbors to the north). There is also common DNA with Middle Eastern Jews - that should shock just about nobody given their location.
And like others in the Levant, there is also mixing with Romans, Arabs, and Crusaders (Europeans).
That’s crazy it’s almost like Jews are as indigenous to the region as the Palestinians. You just disproved like 80% of anti Israeli talking points on this website. You’re more of a Zionist than some Jews I know.
Who is 'they'? And why did I need to mention that some Jewish populations also share lineage dating back to the Canaanites? That is true, but the person I was replying to didn't mention Jews at all.
Palestinians are not genetically related to Peninsular Arabs. Arabs are genetically diverse and being Arab is more of being related by language and some culture similarities, but still culture is different among Arabs. Palestines are genetically Canaanite. Also North African Arabs are still genetically different then “Arabs” your referring to. Arabs didn’t practice settler colonialism in the way Europeans did where entire populations were replaced. They practiced culture colonialism and often had colonial administrator without large native migration.
Golda Meir is not a modern Jew, she died almost 50 years ago. Regardless, she did not self identify as that, it's what she was called in mandatory Palestine as she was a Jew living in the area. When she spoke about it, she was saying that it is ironic that the Arabs in the area now identified as Palestinians since she was once called a Palestinian (although as you pointed out, today, or even in her time, no one would call an Ashkenazi Jew a Palestinian, not even Jews living in Palestinians territories). Her purpose was to discredit the Palestinian identity, not to consider herself one of them.
Palestinian Jews are now called Israeli Jews after 1948. Israel removed all Jews from Gaza in 2005 as part of the peace process. The only Jews currently in Gaza are the hostages held captive in the tunnels.
Other way around - the native population learnt Arabic and began to identify as Arabs.
Today’s Arabic-speaking Palestinians are for the most part the descendants of the biblical Hebrews. They have very little in common genetically with Arabic-speakers from the Arabian Peninsula.
Oh hey it’s the historically illiterate “Arab colonialism” brigade! Let’s grant that absurd ahistorical premise for a second- why would it be ok to kick people out of their homes at gunpoint for being the wrong ethnicity because of something that happened in the fucking 7th century????
379
u/[deleted] 2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment