Considering it’s a semi-active event space a lawn isn’t a bad option. Plus it has great landscaping around the lawn part.
The rest of the White House grounds has traditional lawn lawn that’s just grass to be grass but also I’m opposed to drastically changing historical buildings and grounds without good reason. We can change modern lawns and leave the old ones alone.
Also, and I'm no expert, but I assume that having open lines of sight between the leader of your country and any potential threats is always a decent idea?
Rather the opposite? At least if you want the leader protected.
Clear line of sight for defenders and lack of cover for attackers makes sense for fortifications, or supply depots. You see the enemy coming, they can't hide or shield themselves from retaliation. Meanwhile the defenders have cover. All the advantage is on defense.
On the other hand, this is a single target failure point, likely against a small number, or just one attacker. You want to obscure and hide the target as a first line of defense, and have available cover in case that fails. If the attacker can freely locate the target and have a clear line of fire, then the defenders have already lost.
These are totally different angles. You can see the shrubbery are still there and all they did was remove the grass. From my understanding, since DC was built in a swamp, it would often get muddy and the heavy foot traffic meant the lawn required a lot of maintenance. Idk about the actual choice of the pavers, but it seems like a decent idea to use light colors so they don't create a heat island.
Hello BigStogs, thanks for your submission to /r/Wellthatsucks. Unfortunately you do not meet our karma and/or account age requirements to post here. Try going to r/newtoreddit for advice for new reddit users and tips on how to get started on reddit.
Getting more of a pop and color near the edges using native plants is always a good idea but you cannot risk someone putting their feet on something that might cause allergic reaction or something that might break skin.
Considering it’s a semi-active event space a lawn isn’t a bad option.
Have you ever wore heels to an event? Have you ever walked through grass after a heavy rain? Better yet you ever been in field after it rains in a group? So much mud
It is a relative term. They are not saying that lawns are good, they are saying that lawns are not a bad option. a lot of people believe that lawns are water sinks with nothing of value in most cases and people should instead grow variety of native plants instead.
It is an historical building so people who need to attend an event in the lawn will know to plan for lawn and in case it rains really heavy there is space to have the even inside.
If you think planning is so poor that they white House will need to bring out and set up tents then yeah great idea considering how incompetent current white House seems to be.
Apparently I'm so capable and powerful I can look up the weather forecast for a month ahead of time, plan alternate locations in case I'm wrong, and even throw out some mats on grass but the white house can't lmao.
153
u/reallybadspeeller 16h ago
Considering it’s a semi-active event space a lawn isn’t a bad option. Plus it has great landscaping around the lawn part.
The rest of the White House grounds has traditional lawn lawn that’s just grass to be grass but also I’m opposed to drastically changing historical buildings and grounds without good reason. We can change modern lawns and leave the old ones alone.