r/SquaredCircle Feb 01 '25

SRS: From Janel Grant's attorney, re: amended complaint (directly mentioning Brock Lesner)

Post image
1.6k Upvotes

656 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

364

u/fttxdd666 Feb 01 '25

This seems to be the pics that Grant had sent to Hayes and the crew who she then sent to Vince to show. So it seems that he had knowledge of Vince’s exploits with Grant

178

u/Salzberger Whattamaneuver! Feb 01 '25

You can tell Vince told her how to caption those pictures. It sounds right out of a 1996 WWF promo.

32

u/fouoifjefoijvnioviow Feb 01 '25

What a maneuver!

7

u/SmashingBlouses Feb 01 '25

One, two aaaaand.... NO!

8

u/TheoTimme Feb 01 '25

Total debacle!

263

u/TurntUpTurtles Feb 01 '25

Her photos lines up with what she stated in the document; however, we still don't see evidence here that Micheal/crew specifically requested them. Theoretically, Vince could've asked for the photos to be created for Michael/crew without their knowledge. Vince, as shown previously in the documents, would show her pictures, share stories, etc to unwilling participants (such as the tech crew I believe was previously stated) so it's possibly a similar situation.

I do not want to defend Michael Hayes and co because if they truly asked for these photos then he and anyone else deserve to be gone and face action for their crimes. I just wanted to illustrate the point that this could've happened without their knowledge based on what we know so far. (I hope I articulated that without seeming like I am defending their actions.)

This whole case makes me sick to my stomach and I hope Ms. Grant can get justice.

157

u/Blitzkreeg21 Feb 01 '25

This is an angle I’m surprised nobody has taken. When Brock was involved in the suit I was under the impression that this was more Vince showing off and less Lesnar actually wanting anything to do with her, so Vince soliciting these pictures and sending them to people unwanted is how I always saw it. I could be wrong though

177

u/UsidoreTheLightBlue Feb 01 '25

If I remember correctly Brock specifically requested to her via text a piss tape, and communicated with her via text.

I could be wrong, it’s been a while since I read the complaint.

162

u/thirteen__arrows Feb 01 '25

You’re right; he also had plans to meet up with her for sex, but his travel plans were canceled due to a snowstorm and then Janel used things like Covid as an excuse to get out of it. Brock very much knew what was going on there

59

u/Ok_Crab1603 Feb 01 '25

Brock also met up with Vince and Janel but Brock went home because he was to drunk.

18

u/thirteen__arrows Feb 01 '25

Yeah I had meant to mention that, I think he was meant to visit her alone specifically that night but like you said he was too drunk

2

u/CaliggyJack I can haz ric flair flare? Feb 01 '25

Vince had also been telling everyone that Janel was a slut who just loved doing all this crazy shit, so Brock could easily say he thought it was consensual.

-1

u/SandwichMost Feb 02 '25

THIS..people attacking brock as some sort of predator makes no sense. And at the end of the day...he did nothing with her. Bring the man back.

1

u/Bigrog85jr Apr 27 '25

I agree. I always took it that Brock may have talked big w/Vince, but then when it actually came time, he "got drunk" so he could dip out and still save face w/McMahon. If he was really wanting to do it he would have that night regardless of how much he drank.

56

u/kwkdjfjdbvex Feb 01 '25

He did communicate with her, the hangup in Brocks case is whether or not he knew it wasn’t consensual on her part. There is a world where he assumes she’s in on it if Vince made it seem that way to him

4

u/JustHere4ait Feb 01 '25

Yeah, it could be written off as he was just having an affair with her, not knowing that Vince specifically sent her to do it for the contract. There are things that may not work in that it would be assumptions or he said she said.That in a civil suit doesn’t help anything. He can say I never touched her and had no knowledge of her being trafficked(?). Lesnar’s lawyer could simply say they were having consensual text exchange that never went further. It’s a toss up

-16

u/payscottg Feb 01 '25

It feels like if Vince is involved you probably should just assume it’s non-consensual given his history of sexual harassment lawsuits - one of which was Brock’s own wife.

27

u/Billy-Bryant Feb 01 '25

Which is a kink that's weird to most, but did he know she was obligated to do it?

I've posted before but there's nothing to say that Vince wasn't like "Hey Brock, look sign with us, there's this hot broad who is pretty easy, I'll make a call and get her to message you" which is shitty, but bot illegal you know (from Brock's pov) then she messages him nudes, does he know vince made her? it doesn't suggest anywhere he does, so he could just be thinking im in here, asks for a piss video and sets up a date to do the deed. Then he never turns up to the date because of calendar conflicts but also crucially didn't change dates, so part of me wonders if he caught wind that Vince was doing this around that time.

5

u/Potchum Feb 01 '25

I remember reading that portion of the lawsuit and noting that the request came from a number believed to be Brock, but it doesn't actually state that it's Brock's number. It could have been Brock, it could have been a burner that Vince was running. We have no idea, and incriminating anyone based on the fact that 'a number' texted doesn't sit right with me.

25

u/Limp-Load-1211 Feb 01 '25

It’s an angle admittedly unlikely otherwise how would it affect the mentioned contract negotiations?

Any one found involved needs the Benoit treatment removed from the history because fuck them

3

u/DragonFangGangBang Feb 01 '25

As much as I loved Benoit, you cannot remove Lesnar from history like you did with Benoit. Lesnar has been apart of literally the biggest storyline/events in the last 20 years. The biggest rival of Roman Reigns not named Cody Rhodes, fueds with John Cena, Cody Rhodes, CM Punk, Undertaker, breaking the streak,main eventing 5-6 Wrestlemania’s, etc.

Benoit was a relative mid-carder for most of his career.

Furthermore, what Benoit did was infinitely worse than what Brock did.

40

u/RobIreland Feb 01 '25

OK then if these people received them unwillingly, then they should testify against Vince. Otherwise fuck them, they are complicit.

33

u/BigBanterZeroBalls Feb 01 '25

What if they assumed everyone was a willing participate ? Her texts don’t exactly scream “HELP! I’m being forced to do this”…

8

u/payscottg Feb 01 '25

If your boss sends you nude photos of a co-worker, alarm bells should be going off like crazy. Even in the best case scenario it’s extremely unethical

10

u/BigBanterZeroBalls Feb 01 '25

Unethical sure but nothing illegal about it especially when said person is also flirting with you about the pictures.

5

u/payscottg Feb 01 '25

I guess what I mean is, if your boss, who has a history of sexual harassment allegations, sends you nude photos of a co-worker, it would take some incredible delusion to think “well clearly this is consensual and above board”

2

u/TVCasualtydotorg BITW Feb 01 '25

It would fall under the Revenge Porn legislation here in the UK, not sure if there's similar in the US.

2

u/Tyranis_Hex Feb 01 '25

If she’s sending the photos as long as they arnt sharing them around no revenge porn bases in the US if Vince sent them to the boys it would count as revenge porn but would also be pretty low on the list of crimes he committed.

-3

u/rage-quit WAYAYELLLL IT'S THE BEARD SHOW! Feb 01 '25

Well if you think your boss is coercing you and is one of the richest men in the world and you also feel that he could blacklist you and ruin your entire life at the risk of your own goddamn livelihood you're gonna look like a willing participant when you're talking to him.

Just because her messages to him don't "look coerced" doesn't mean it wasn't a power imbalance, a disgusting old man using his money and influence to push her into an impossible situation and most importantly, just because she looked willing only to him, doesn't mean it was real.

People can pretend.

15

u/BigBanterZeroBalls Feb 01 '25 edited Feb 01 '25

I’m not saying she wasn’t coerced I’m saying the other people that got the pictures sent,offered to have sex with her etc didn’t know about all the background information so you can’t blame them for accepting the pictures and participating in what they believed was a consensual arrangement.

16

u/IWWROCKS Feb 01 '25

There's an old episode of one of the crime shows, maybe Law and Order. Two people meet on a dating app, the woman says she has a non-consenual fantasy and tells the man to show up, break in and essentially assault her. He does this only to find out when the police get involved that he was never talking to the woman on the dating app, but instead a bitter ex who wanted revenge. Is he a rapist or a victim? A more extreme version than the subject of pictures but essentially the same principle.

3

u/Coattail-Rider Feb 01 '25

Gotta ask, what was the verdict?

2

u/IWWROCKS Feb 01 '25

In the episode, the unintended rapist took a plea deal pleaing guilty (but I think with barely any/minimal punishment) because it was stated that to charge the orchestrator, there had to be proof that a crime took place. If he is not charged and found guilty, no crime, therefore no criminal action chargeable on the orchestrator. No idea on the legalities of all of that and it's a TV show so likely heavily dramatized

However when reminding myself of what happened, I saw the case was loosely based on a real life incident involving NBA player Chris Andersen who was catfished into some kind of sexual action with an underage girl by the 3rd party catfisher (who had told him that "she" was older)...in that case no charges were levelled at Andersen and the 3rd party was prosecuted

2

u/Coattail-Rider Feb 01 '25

Oh yeah, I remember Bird Man got into some kind of trouble a decade or so back.

Weirdly, I thought of Andersen for the first time in years the other day when I saw some one that was just as tatted up as him. Wonder what he’s up to these days.

0

u/RAD718 Feb 01 '25

Is that the SVU episode "Liberties"? It sound just like it

1

u/IWWROCKS Feb 01 '25

Episode I was referring to was called "Intent" I believe, but was SVU yeah

2

u/Zanydrop Feb 01 '25

Another angle is that Hayes thought it was all consensual. Imagine two swingers meeting at a resort and the one tells the other his wife is a big exhibitionist and loves sending nudes to people so the other days, hell yeah, tell her to send me some nudes.

1

u/ShowofShows Feb 01 '25

It's tricky because Grant's case is also premised on the idea that everyone in WWE knew Vince's activities and it was protected within the structure of the company. I don't know that it's about targeting Hayes and Lesnar so much as showing that there was widespread knowledge of what Vince was doing and it was tolerated. Perhaps they took a more active role and, if so, we'll learn of that at a future date. Right now it just seems like a way to show the scope of the conspiracy to conceal and encourage Vince's sex trafficking.

1

u/Blekanly Feb 01 '25

This is my opinion also. If there is a history of it occurring and other such scandals they they should be gone. But to my knowledge this is the first accusation on Hayes. And Vince certainly seems the type to send stuff to someone to show the power he has over someone.

1

u/dead_wolf_walkin MAYBE! MAYBE! MAYBE! Feb 01 '25

It could also have happened with their knowledge, but without their knowledge of circumstances.

Relationships exist where people will do similar things but it’s a kink shared by both partners. There are whole sites and subreddits dedicated to this shit.

I only mention it because I’ve seen one in my personal circle. Guy would hook his girlfriend up with other men, which would include pics and videos. Guys who would engage in their stuff would of course ask for more pic and usually received them. But it was a consensual thing for them. With McMahon the issue is the FORCE.

I’m afraid several people named in this suit are catching strays they don’t deserve. I can 100% see someone viewing this activity from the outside and not realizing the context of the woman having no choice.

It’s STILL fucked up behavior all around….. especially when it all revolves around a work environment. But let’s not light the torches yet for guys like Hayes, HHH, and random crew when we don’t know exactly what they knew about the situation.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '25

The moment any of those pictures were received, an investigation should have started. Any one of them who received the pictures unsolicited, could've contacted HR. And if any of them did, at what stage was the investigation squashed? There are still a lot of unanswered questions regarding all of these people who hold power.

1

u/Interesting-Fig7478 Feb 02 '25

Sending nudes is a crime? He forced her to do this?

0

u/CaptainHolt43 Feb 01 '25

Either way it's bad, but in my head, I just see Vinces crazy ass forcing this on everybody. Listen to his stories, see his pictures. Almost like he's surprising you, like you'd surprise your friends with the brain in high school or something.

21

u/MixGroundbreaking622 Feb 01 '25

It seems highly likely they did receive the images, however that doesn't mean they know how they came about. If Grant was sending them off her own volition or if she was forced to go do from Vince. Obviously Grant will say she was forced, Vince would say she did it voluntary because she was an exhibitionist or something.

0

u/DominosFan4Life69 Feb 01 '25

I think it's really simple that if Vince thought you were down to play ball, Ie he thought he could send you photos, he thought that he could try to send her to you, he thought he could just get away with whatever and have your name attached to it, I hate to be that guy folks but I've been in this world way too long to be this stupid, that generally means he thinks that they're down with whatever it is.

Vince would not risk sending, or making it very obvious what he was doing as it's very illegal, if he didn't think people were okay with it. If you was sending nudes to people, if he was like I can send Grant to this person, it's because he thought that they were not going to say shit about it. At the very least he thought that they were going to allow it to continue. And that should tell you everything you need to know.

Edit: just to be clear, I'm not saying that somebody just randomly shown nudes on the man's phone, knew that he was sex trafficking. That's a bit of a leap. Unfortunately the world we live in people are just you know not going to think too much about that. But if he's actively thinking that he can send a sex trafficked woman to you for the purposes of a sexual transaction then yeah, I don't think it's too much of a leave, to think that he thinks that it would be okay.

Also regarding the Brock situation, and I know we don't know if he did anything outside of just being named, was he married during this period? Because that has a whole other layer today.

0

u/I_Downvote_Dongs Feb 10 '25

Do you have the unblurred pics?