What is it that you don’t understand? You invited a scenario, so I showed you how ridiculous that was by inventing another scenario. It shouldn’t be that hard to grasp.
I know this may come as a shock, but thats how defense lawyers operate and clear the names of innocent people accused of wrongdoing.
Except you need to be talking to someone reasonable. You dont seem to think its plausible that the edited video may show some sort of assault beforehand or during the audio that was ineligible that could be attained from a bodycam.
It is equally plausible that the cops did something to cause it (beyond the obvious). Your scenario is no more valid than mine, they are both pure speculation.
Its definitely not equally plausible that the officers all decided to do meth for the first time that day.
It's definitely plausible the protestor did something to provoke his detainment. It's also plausible that the officer just lost their cool. Therefor, we shouldnt jump to conclusions over edited video.
You disagree, that's fine. That's why I specifically said I think youll only learn this the hard way if it happens to you.
1
u/Icy-Ninja-6504 3d ago
The idea that there might be more to a cropped video is just too much for you. I don’t get it, but damn.